A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lewis, Seth C.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Molyneux, Logan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562
Resumo: Amid a broader reckoning about the role of social media in public life, this article argues that the same scrutiny can be applied to the journalism studies field and its approaches to examining social media. A decade later, what hath such research wrought? In the broad study of news and its digital transformation, few topics have captivated researchers quite like social media, with hundreds of studies on everything from how journalists use Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Snapchat to how such platforms facilitate various forms of engagement between journalists and audiences. Now, some 10 years into journalism studies on social media, we need a more particular accounting of the assumptions, biases, and blind spots that have crept into this line of research. Our purpose is to provoke reflection and chart a path for future research by critiquing themes of what has come before. In particular, our goal is to untangle three faulty assumptions—often implicit but no less influential—that have been overlooked in the rapid take-up of social media as a key phenomenon for journalism studies: (1) that social media would be a net positive; (2) that social media reflects reality; and (3) that social media matters over and above other factors.
id RCAP_ef293357874331602e577ae87493cbf3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1562
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forwardaudience; journalism; news; research; social mediaAmid a broader reckoning about the role of social media in public life, this article argues that the same scrutiny can be applied to the journalism studies field and its approaches to examining social media. A decade later, what hath such research wrought? In the broad study of news and its digital transformation, few topics have captivated researchers quite like social media, with hundreds of studies on everything from how journalists use Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Snapchat to how such platforms facilitate various forms of engagement between journalists and audiences. Now, some 10 years into journalism studies on social media, we need a more particular accounting of the assumptions, biases, and blind spots that have crept into this line of research. Our purpose is to provoke reflection and chart a path for future research by critiquing themes of what has come before. In particular, our goal is to untangle three faulty assumptions—often implicit but no less influential—that have been overlooked in the rapid take-up of social media as a key phenomenon for journalism studies: (1) that social media would be a net positive; (2) that social media reflects reality; and (3) that social media matters over and above other factors.Cogitatio2018-11-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1562Media and Communication; Vol 6, No 4 (2018): News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media; 11-232183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1562https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1562/1562Copyright (c) 2018 Seth C. Lewis, Logan Molyneuxhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLewis, Seth C.Molyneux, Logan2022-12-20T10:58:49Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1562Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:09.030186Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
title A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
spellingShingle A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
Lewis, Seth C.
audience; journalism; news; research; social media
title_short A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
title_full A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
title_fullStr A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
title_full_unstemmed A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
title_sort A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward
author Lewis, Seth C.
author_facet Lewis, Seth C.
Molyneux, Logan
author_role author
author2 Molyneux, Logan
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lewis, Seth C.
Molyneux, Logan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv audience; journalism; news; research; social media
topic audience; journalism; news; research; social media
description Amid a broader reckoning about the role of social media in public life, this article argues that the same scrutiny can be applied to the journalism studies field and its approaches to examining social media. A decade later, what hath such research wrought? In the broad study of news and its digital transformation, few topics have captivated researchers quite like social media, with hundreds of studies on everything from how journalists use Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Snapchat to how such platforms facilitate various forms of engagement between journalists and audiences. Now, some 10 years into journalism studies on social media, we need a more particular accounting of the assumptions, biases, and blind spots that have crept into this line of research. Our purpose is to provoke reflection and chart a path for future research by critiquing themes of what has come before. In particular, our goal is to untangle three faulty assumptions—often implicit but no less influential—that have been overlooked in the rapid take-up of social media as a key phenomenon for journalism studies: (1) that social media would be a net positive; (2) that social media reflects reality; and (3) that social media matters over and above other factors.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1562
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1562
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1562
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1562/1562
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Seth C. Lewis, Logan Molyneux
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Seth C. Lewis, Logan Molyneux
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 6, No 4 (2018): News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media; 11-23
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130658713370624