EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Buzogány, Aron
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Ćetković, Stefan, Maltby, Tomas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7361
Resumo: When faced with highly heterogeneous national conditions and preferences, the EU has often resorted to differentiation to ensure political support for advancing common policies. Despite growing scholarly interest in differentiation in the EU, conceptual clarity and empirical evidence of different forms of differentiation are still in a nascent stage. Particularly the use of differentiation in times of crisis needs to be better understood. To address this research gap, we investigate differentiation in the EU renewable energy policy in response to the crisis stirred by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. We find that the EU successfully used the Ukraine crisis to increase the ambition of renewable energy policy, but this was accompanied by various and often novel forms of differentiation. Rather than formally exempting countries from common EU provisions (differentiated integration), EU decision-makers strategically incorporated flexibility in implementation, often tailored to a few outlier countries. Strategic flexibility was instrumental in overcoming political disagreements among national governments and adopting a more ambitious and comprehensive renewable energy policy. Our findings contribute conceptually and empirically to understanding various forms of differentiation in EU policymaking and how they are employed to facilitate the building of political majorities during crises.
id RCAP_f1712652d8596acc8db3af99c0653be7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7361
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?climate policy; differentiation; energy policy; European crisis; European Union; renewable energy; Ukraine warWhen faced with highly heterogeneous national conditions and preferences, the EU has often resorted to differentiation to ensure political support for advancing common policies. Despite growing scholarly interest in differentiation in the EU, conceptual clarity and empirical evidence of different forms of differentiation are still in a nascent stage. Particularly the use of differentiation in times of crisis needs to be better understood. To address this research gap, we investigate differentiation in the EU renewable energy policy in response to the crisis stirred by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. We find that the EU successfully used the Ukraine crisis to increase the ambition of renewable energy policy, but this was accompanied by various and often novel forms of differentiation. Rather than formally exempting countries from common EU provisions (differentiated integration), EU decision-makers strategically incorporated flexibility in implementation, often tailored to a few outlier countries. Strategic flexibility was instrumental in overcoming political disagreements among national governments and adopting a more ambitious and comprehensive renewable energy policy. Our findings contribute conceptually and empirically to understanding various forms of differentiation in EU policymaking and how they are employed to facilitate the building of political majorities during crises.Cogitatio Press2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7361https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7361Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Governing the EU Polycrisis: Institutional Change After the Pandemic and the War in Ukraine; 263-2742183-246310.17645/pag.i374reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7361https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7361/3501Copyright (c) 2023 Aron Buzogány, Stefan Ćetković, Tomas Maltbyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBuzogány, AronĆetković, StefanMaltby, Tomas2024-01-11T15:50:36Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7361Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:30:02.248997Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
title EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
spellingShingle EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
Buzogány, Aron
climate policy; differentiation; energy policy; European crisis; European Union; renewable energy; Ukraine war
title_short EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
title_full EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
title_fullStr EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
title_full_unstemmed EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
title_sort EU Renewable Energy Governance and the Ukraine War: Moving Ahead Through Strategic Flexibility?
author Buzogány, Aron
author_facet Buzogány, Aron
Ćetković, Stefan
Maltby, Tomas
author_role author
author2 Ćetković, Stefan
Maltby, Tomas
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Buzogány, Aron
Ćetković, Stefan
Maltby, Tomas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv climate policy; differentiation; energy policy; European crisis; European Union; renewable energy; Ukraine war
topic climate policy; differentiation; energy policy; European crisis; European Union; renewable energy; Ukraine war
description When faced with highly heterogeneous national conditions and preferences, the EU has often resorted to differentiation to ensure political support for advancing common policies. Despite growing scholarly interest in differentiation in the EU, conceptual clarity and empirical evidence of different forms of differentiation are still in a nascent stage. Particularly the use of differentiation in times of crisis needs to be better understood. To address this research gap, we investigate differentiation in the EU renewable energy policy in response to the crisis stirred by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. We find that the EU successfully used the Ukraine crisis to increase the ambition of renewable energy policy, but this was accompanied by various and often novel forms of differentiation. Rather than formally exempting countries from common EU provisions (differentiated integration), EU decision-makers strategically incorporated flexibility in implementation, often tailored to a few outlier countries. Strategic flexibility was instrumental in overcoming political disagreements among national governments and adopting a more ambitious and comprehensive renewable energy policy. Our findings contribute conceptually and empirically to understanding various forms of differentiation in EU policymaking and how they are employed to facilitate the building of political majorities during crises.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7361
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7361
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7361
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7361
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7361/3501
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Aron Buzogány, Stefan Ćetković, Tomas Maltby
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Aron Buzogány, Stefan Ćetković, Tomas Maltby
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Governing the EU Polycrisis: Institutional Change After the Pandemic and the War in Ukraine; 263-274
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i374
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136782682423296