Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carneiro, João
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Conceição, Luís, Martinho, Diogo, Marreiros, Goreti, Novais, Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381
Resumo: Many multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have been proposed over the last decades. Some of the most known methods share some similarities in the way they are used and configured. However, we live in a time of change and nowadays the decision-making process (especially when done in group) is even more demanding and dynamic. In thiswork,we propose aMCDAmethod that includes cognitive aspects (cognitive analytic process, CAP). By taking advantage of aspects such as expertise level, credibility and behaviour style of the decision-makers, we propose a method that relates these aspects with problem configurations (alternatives and criteria preferences) done by each decisionmaker. In this work, we evaluated the CAP in terms of configuration costs and the capability to enhance the quality of the decision. We have used the satisfaction level as a metric to compare our method with other known MCDA methods in literature (utility function, AHP and TOPSIS).Our method proved to be capable to achieve higher satisfaction levels compared to other MCDA methods, especially when the decision suggested by CAP is different from the one proposed by those methods.
id RCAP_f1b511df60c5bb4c41da0e065bc8fe2a
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/9381
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysisMultiple criteria decision analysisCognitive decision-makingGroup decision-makingBehavioural decision theoryAHPTOPSISMany multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have been proposed over the last decades. Some of the most known methods share some similarities in the way they are used and configured. However, we live in a time of change and nowadays the decision-making process (especially when done in group) is even more demanding and dynamic. In thiswork,we propose aMCDAmethod that includes cognitive aspects (cognitive analytic process, CAP). By taking advantage of aspects such as expertise level, credibility and behaviour style of the decision-makers, we propose a method that relates these aspects with problem configurations (alternatives and criteria preferences) done by each decisionmaker. In this work, we evaluated the CAP in terms of configuration costs and the capability to enhance the quality of the decision. We have used the satisfaction level as a metric to compare our method with other known MCDA methods in literature (utility function, AHP and TOPSIS).Our method proved to be capable to achieve higher satisfaction levels compared to other MCDA methods, especially when the decision suggested by CAP is different from the one proposed by those methods.Springer VerlagRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoCarneiro, JoãoConceição, LuísMartinho, DiogoMarreiros, GoretiNovais, Paulo2016-122117-12-01T00:00:00Z2016-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381eng10.1007/s10479-016-2391-1metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T12:50:45Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/9381Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:29:59.651302Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
title Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
spellingShingle Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
Carneiro, João
Multiple criteria decision analysis
Cognitive decision-making
Group decision-making
Behavioural decision theory
AHP
TOPSIS
title_short Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
title_full Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
title_fullStr Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
title_full_unstemmed Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
title_sort Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
author Carneiro, João
author_facet Carneiro, João
Conceição, Luís
Martinho, Diogo
Marreiros, Goreti
Novais, Paulo
author_role author
author2 Conceição, Luís
Martinho, Diogo
Marreiros, Goreti
Novais, Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carneiro, João
Conceição, Luís
Martinho, Diogo
Marreiros, Goreti
Novais, Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multiple criteria decision analysis
Cognitive decision-making
Group decision-making
Behavioural decision theory
AHP
TOPSIS
topic Multiple criteria decision analysis
Cognitive decision-making
Group decision-making
Behavioural decision theory
AHP
TOPSIS
description Many multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have been proposed over the last decades. Some of the most known methods share some similarities in the way they are used and configured. However, we live in a time of change and nowadays the decision-making process (especially when done in group) is even more demanding and dynamic. In thiswork,we propose aMCDAmethod that includes cognitive aspects (cognitive analytic process, CAP). By taking advantage of aspects such as expertise level, credibility and behaviour style of the decision-makers, we propose a method that relates these aspects with problem configurations (alternatives and criteria preferences) done by each decisionmaker. In this work, we evaluated the CAP in terms of configuration costs and the capability to enhance the quality of the decision. We have used the satisfaction level as a metric to compare our method with other known MCDA methods in literature (utility function, AHP and TOPSIS).Our method proved to be capable to achieve higher satisfaction levels compared to other MCDA methods, especially when the decision suggested by CAP is different from the one proposed by those methods.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12
2016-12-01T00:00:00Z
2117-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-016-2391-1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131395839229952