Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381 |
Resumo: | Many multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have been proposed over the last decades. Some of the most known methods share some similarities in the way they are used and configured. However, we live in a time of change and nowadays the decision-making process (especially when done in group) is even more demanding and dynamic. In thiswork,we propose aMCDAmethod that includes cognitive aspects (cognitive analytic process, CAP). By taking advantage of aspects such as expertise level, credibility and behaviour style of the decision-makers, we propose a method that relates these aspects with problem configurations (alternatives and criteria preferences) done by each decisionmaker. In this work, we evaluated the CAP in terms of configuration costs and the capability to enhance the quality of the decision. We have used the satisfaction level as a metric to compare our method with other known MCDA methods in literature (utility function, AHP and TOPSIS).Our method proved to be capable to achieve higher satisfaction levels compared to other MCDA methods, especially when the decision suggested by CAP is different from the one proposed by those methods. |
id |
RCAP_f1b511df60c5bb4c41da0e065bc8fe2a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/9381 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysisMultiple criteria decision analysisCognitive decision-makingGroup decision-makingBehavioural decision theoryAHPTOPSISMany multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have been proposed over the last decades. Some of the most known methods share some similarities in the way they are used and configured. However, we live in a time of change and nowadays the decision-making process (especially when done in group) is even more demanding and dynamic. In thiswork,we propose aMCDAmethod that includes cognitive aspects (cognitive analytic process, CAP). By taking advantage of aspects such as expertise level, credibility and behaviour style of the decision-makers, we propose a method that relates these aspects with problem configurations (alternatives and criteria preferences) done by each decisionmaker. In this work, we evaluated the CAP in terms of configuration costs and the capability to enhance the quality of the decision. We have used the satisfaction level as a metric to compare our method with other known MCDA methods in literature (utility function, AHP and TOPSIS).Our method proved to be capable to achieve higher satisfaction levels compared to other MCDA methods, especially when the decision suggested by CAP is different from the one proposed by those methods.Springer VerlagRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoCarneiro, JoãoConceição, LuísMartinho, DiogoMarreiros, GoretiNovais, Paulo2016-122117-12-01T00:00:00Z2016-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381eng10.1007/s10479-016-2391-1metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T12:50:45Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/9381Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:29:59.651302Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis |
title |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis |
spellingShingle |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis Carneiro, João Multiple criteria decision analysis Cognitive decision-making Group decision-making Behavioural decision theory AHP TOPSIS |
title_short |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis |
title_full |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis |
title_fullStr |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis |
title_sort |
Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis |
author |
Carneiro, João |
author_facet |
Carneiro, João Conceição, Luís Martinho, Diogo Marreiros, Goreti Novais, Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Conceição, Luís Martinho, Diogo Marreiros, Goreti Novais, Paulo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carneiro, João Conceição, Luís Martinho, Diogo Marreiros, Goreti Novais, Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multiple criteria decision analysis Cognitive decision-making Group decision-making Behavioural decision theory AHP TOPSIS |
topic |
Multiple criteria decision analysis Cognitive decision-making Group decision-making Behavioural decision theory AHP TOPSIS |
description |
Many multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have been proposed over the last decades. Some of the most known methods share some similarities in the way they are used and configured. However, we live in a time of change and nowadays the decision-making process (especially when done in group) is even more demanding and dynamic. In thiswork,we propose aMCDAmethod that includes cognitive aspects (cognitive analytic process, CAP). By taking advantage of aspects such as expertise level, credibility and behaviour style of the decision-makers, we propose a method that relates these aspects with problem configurations (alternatives and criteria preferences) done by each decisionmaker. In this work, we evaluated the CAP in terms of configuration costs and the capability to enhance the quality of the decision. We have used the satisfaction level as a metric to compare our method with other known MCDA methods in literature (utility function, AHP and TOPSIS).Our method proved to be capable to achieve higher satisfaction levels compared to other MCDA methods, especially when the decision suggested by CAP is different from the one proposed by those methods. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z 2117-12-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/9381 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1007/s10479-016-2391-1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131395839229952 |