Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silveira, I.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Sousa, M., Antunes, N., Silva, V., Roque, C., Pinheiro-Vieira, A., Lagarto, V., Hipólito-Reis, A., Luz, A., Torres, S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2134
Resumo: Introduction: Symptoms like syncope or palpitations frequently present a diagnostic challenge. An implantable loop recorder (ILR) is an important aid in the management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients that underwent ILR implantation from November 2007 to 2014. For each patient the indication for implantation, baseline characteristics, previous study, complications, recorded tracing and interventions were evaluated. Results: A total of 62 patients were included, 50% men, with a mean age of 62.5±18.8 years old. Previously to ILR implantation 88.7% of patients had performed Holter, 17.7% external events recorder, 33.9% Tilt test and 29% an electrophysiological study. The implantation indications were recurrent syncope in 90.3%, palpitations 8.1% and ischemic stroke in one patient. Mean follow-up time was 17.1±16.3 months. Symptoms were reported in 66.1% of the patients, 46.8% of those yielding a diagnostic finding. In all cases of palpitation complaints with diagnosis we found atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with syncope atrioventricular conduction disturbance was demonstrated in 19.6%, sinus node dysfunction in 16.1%, paroxysmal supra-ventricular tachycardia 7.1% and AF in 1.8%. These finding resulted in 19 pacemaker and one CRT-D implantation, introduction of anticoagulation in five patients and one ablation of accessory pathway. There were no major complications. Conclusion: ILR proved to be safe and efficient. It has enabled the identification or exclusion of serious rhythm disturbances in more than half of patients and provided a targeted therapeutic intervention.
id RCAP_f3bcc91beec051ab138c23492a4329bf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2134
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A CenterAtrial FibrillationImplantable Loop RecorderTherapeutic InterventionIntroduction: Symptoms like syncope or palpitations frequently present a diagnostic challenge. An implantable loop recorder (ILR) is an important aid in the management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients that underwent ILR implantation from November 2007 to 2014. For each patient the indication for implantation, baseline characteristics, previous study, complications, recorded tracing and interventions were evaluated. Results: A total of 62 patients were included, 50% men, with a mean age of 62.5±18.8 years old. Previously to ILR implantation 88.7% of patients had performed Holter, 17.7% external events recorder, 33.9% Tilt test and 29% an electrophysiological study. The implantation indications were recurrent syncope in 90.3%, palpitations 8.1% and ischemic stroke in one patient. Mean follow-up time was 17.1±16.3 months. Symptoms were reported in 66.1% of the patients, 46.8% of those yielding a diagnostic finding. In all cases of palpitation complaints with diagnosis we found atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with syncope atrioventricular conduction disturbance was demonstrated in 19.6%, sinus node dysfunction in 16.1%, paroxysmal supra-ventricular tachycardia 7.1% and AF in 1.8%. These finding resulted in 19 pacemaker and one CRT-D implantation, introduction of anticoagulation in five patients and one ablation of accessory pathway. There were no major complications. Conclusion: ILR proved to be safe and efficient. It has enabled the identification or exclusion of serious rhythm disturbances in more than half of patients and provided a targeted therapeutic intervention.Cardiofront, IncRepositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo AntónioSilveira, I.Sousa, M.Antunes, N.Silva, V.Roque, C.Pinheiro-Vieira, A.Lagarto, V.Hipólito-Reis, A.Luz, A.Torres, S.2017-07-06T13:55:34Z20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2134engJ Atr Fibrillation. 2016;9(2):14251941-691110.4022/jafib.1425info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-20T10:59:10Zoai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2134Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:38:22.895630Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
title Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
spellingShingle Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
Silveira, I.
Atrial Fibrillation
Implantable Loop Recorder
Therapeutic Intervention
title_short Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
title_full Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
title_fullStr Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
title_sort Efficacy And Safety Of Implantable Loop Recorder: Experience Of A Center
author Silveira, I.
author_facet Silveira, I.
Sousa, M.
Antunes, N.
Silva, V.
Roque, C.
Pinheiro-Vieira, A.
Lagarto, V.
Hipólito-Reis, A.
Luz, A.
Torres, S.
author_role author
author2 Sousa, M.
Antunes, N.
Silva, V.
Roque, C.
Pinheiro-Vieira, A.
Lagarto, V.
Hipólito-Reis, A.
Luz, A.
Torres, S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira, I.
Sousa, M.
Antunes, N.
Silva, V.
Roque, C.
Pinheiro-Vieira, A.
Lagarto, V.
Hipólito-Reis, A.
Luz, A.
Torres, S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Atrial Fibrillation
Implantable Loop Recorder
Therapeutic Intervention
topic Atrial Fibrillation
Implantable Loop Recorder
Therapeutic Intervention
description Introduction: Symptoms like syncope or palpitations frequently present a diagnostic challenge. An implantable loop recorder (ILR) is an important aid in the management of these patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients that underwent ILR implantation from November 2007 to 2014. For each patient the indication for implantation, baseline characteristics, previous study, complications, recorded tracing and interventions were evaluated. Results: A total of 62 patients were included, 50% men, with a mean age of 62.5±18.8 years old. Previously to ILR implantation 88.7% of patients had performed Holter, 17.7% external events recorder, 33.9% Tilt test and 29% an electrophysiological study. The implantation indications were recurrent syncope in 90.3%, palpitations 8.1% and ischemic stroke in one patient. Mean follow-up time was 17.1±16.3 months. Symptoms were reported in 66.1% of the patients, 46.8% of those yielding a diagnostic finding. In all cases of palpitation complaints with diagnosis we found atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with syncope atrioventricular conduction disturbance was demonstrated in 19.6%, sinus node dysfunction in 16.1%, paroxysmal supra-ventricular tachycardia 7.1% and AF in 1.8%. These finding resulted in 19 pacemaker and one CRT-D implantation, introduction of anticoagulation in five patients and one ablation of accessory pathway. There were no major complications. Conclusion: ILR proved to be safe and efficient. It has enabled the identification or exclusion of serious rhythm disturbances in more than half of patients and provided a targeted therapeutic intervention.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017-07-06T13:55:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2134
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2134
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Atr Fibrillation. 2016;9(2):1425
1941-6911
10.4022/jafib.1425
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cardiofront, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cardiofront, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133645000146944