Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, J. M.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Horta, H., Amâncio, L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616
Resumo: The presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas.
id RCAP_f5a6221acb703fdfa4b513ca98728b5f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/20616
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academiaResearch agendasInstitutional characteristicsGender inequalitiesAcademic professionCollaborationThe presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas.Routledge/Taylor and Francis2020-07-20T15:54:08Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-08-04T16:41:03Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616eng0954-025310.1080/09540253.2020.1792844Santos, J. M.Horta, H.Amâncio, L.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:32:40Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/20616Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:14:40.460978Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
title Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
spellingShingle Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
Santos, J. M.
Research agendas
Institutional characteristics
Gender inequalities
Academic profession
Collaboration
title_short Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
title_full Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
title_fullStr Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
title_full_unstemmed Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
title_sort Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
author Santos, J. M.
author_facet Santos, J. M.
Horta, H.
Amâncio, L.
author_role author
author2 Horta, H.
Amâncio, L.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, J. M.
Horta, H.
Amâncio, L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Research agendas
Institutional characteristics
Gender inequalities
Academic profession
Collaboration
topic Research agendas
Institutional characteristics
Gender inequalities
Academic profession
Collaboration
description The presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-20T15:54:08Z
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2021-08-04T16:41:03Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0954-0253
10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge/Taylor and Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge/Taylor and Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134703802908672