Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616 |
Resumo: | The presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas. |
id |
RCAP_f5a6221acb703fdfa4b513ca98728b5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/20616 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academiaResearch agendasInstitutional characteristicsGender inequalitiesAcademic professionCollaborationThe presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas.Routledge/Taylor and Francis2020-07-20T15:54:08Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-08-04T16:41:03Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616eng0954-025310.1080/09540253.2020.1792844Santos, J. M.Horta, H.Amâncio, L.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:32:40Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/20616Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:14:40.460978Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia |
title |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia |
spellingShingle |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia Santos, J. M. Research agendas Institutional characteristics Gender inequalities Academic profession Collaboration |
title_short |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia |
title_full |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia |
title_fullStr |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia |
title_sort |
Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia |
author |
Santos, J. M. |
author_facet |
Santos, J. M. Horta, H. Amâncio, L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Horta, H. Amâncio, L. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, J. M. Horta, H. Amâncio, L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Research agendas Institutional characteristics Gender inequalities Academic profession Collaboration |
topic |
Research agendas Institutional characteristics Gender inequalities Academic profession Collaboration |
description |
The presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-20T15:54:08Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021 2021-08-04T16:41:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20616 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0954-0253 10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge/Taylor and Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge/Taylor and Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134703802908672 |