Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moser, Johannes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Wenner, Fabian, Thierstein, Alain
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5306
Resumo: As a protective measure during the Covid-19 pandemic, in Spring 2020, a high number of employees began relocating their workplace to their homes, many for the first time. Recent surveys suggest that the share of those working from home (WFH) will remain higher than before the pandemic in the long term too—with correspondingly fewer commuting journeys. Workplaces are still often concentrated in inner cities, into which workers commute from more outlying areas. However, classical geographical economic theory suggests that a reduced need for commuting might lead to a reorientation of residential preferences amongst employees towards even fewer urban areas, as households trade off the disamenity of commuting against lower housing costs and more living space. This article investigates how such consequences could unfold in space. The Munich Metropolitan Region is characterised by a high share of knowledge-based jobs suitable for WFH and thus serves as our case study. We collect data at the municipality level for relevant aspects of residential location choices and develop an index for the potential of additional residential demand through increased WFH for each municipality in the Munich Metropolitan Region. Crucially, a municipality’s potential depends on the number of commuting days per week. Keeping the weekly commuting time budget constant, an increase in WFH, or a reduction in commuting days allows a longer commuting time per trip. We visualise our results and sensitivities with maps. We observe a gradual yet discontinuous decay of potentials from the region’s core to the fringes with an increase in WFH days.
id RCAP_f5b43f0494fdd6362a2fcd6b8174df60
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5306
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?commuting; Covid-19; regional development; working from homeAs a protective measure during the Covid-19 pandemic, in Spring 2020, a high number of employees began relocating their workplace to their homes, many for the first time. Recent surveys suggest that the share of those working from home (WFH) will remain higher than before the pandemic in the long term too—with correspondingly fewer commuting journeys. Workplaces are still often concentrated in inner cities, into which workers commute from more outlying areas. However, classical geographical economic theory suggests that a reduced need for commuting might lead to a reorientation of residential preferences amongst employees towards even fewer urban areas, as households trade off the disamenity of commuting against lower housing costs and more living space. This article investigates how such consequences could unfold in space. The Munich Metropolitan Region is characterised by a high share of knowledge-based jobs suitable for WFH and thus serves as our case study. We collect data at the municipality level for relevant aspects of residential location choices and develop an index for the potential of additional residential demand through increased WFH for each municipality in the Munich Metropolitan Region. Crucially, a municipality’s potential depends on the number of commuting days per week. Keeping the weekly commuting time budget constant, an increase in WFH, or a reduction in commuting days allows a longer commuting time per trip. We visualise our results and sensitivities with maps. We observe a gradual yet discontinuous decay of potentials from the region’s core to the fringes with an increase in WFH days.Cogitatio2022-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5306https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5306Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 3 (2022): The Resilient Metropolis: Planning in an Era of Decentralization; 15-342183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5306https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5306/5306Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Moser, Fabian Wenner, Alain Thiersteininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoser, JohannesWenner, FabianThierstein, Alain2023-01-26T21:15:34Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5306Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:55.696483Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
title Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
spellingShingle Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
Moser, Johannes
commuting; Covid-19; regional development; working from home
title_short Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
title_full Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
title_fullStr Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
title_full_unstemmed Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
title_sort Working From Home and Covid-19: Where Could Residents Move to?
author Moser, Johannes
author_facet Moser, Johannes
Wenner, Fabian
Thierstein, Alain
author_role author
author2 Wenner, Fabian
Thierstein, Alain
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moser, Johannes
Wenner, Fabian
Thierstein, Alain
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv commuting; Covid-19; regional development; working from home
topic commuting; Covid-19; regional development; working from home
description As a protective measure during the Covid-19 pandemic, in Spring 2020, a high number of employees began relocating their workplace to their homes, many for the first time. Recent surveys suggest that the share of those working from home (WFH) will remain higher than before the pandemic in the long term too—with correspondingly fewer commuting journeys. Workplaces are still often concentrated in inner cities, into which workers commute from more outlying areas. However, classical geographical economic theory suggests that a reduced need for commuting might lead to a reorientation of residential preferences amongst employees towards even fewer urban areas, as households trade off the disamenity of commuting against lower housing costs and more living space. This article investigates how such consequences could unfold in space. The Munich Metropolitan Region is characterised by a high share of knowledge-based jobs suitable for WFH and thus serves as our case study. We collect data at the municipality level for relevant aspects of residential location choices and develop an index for the potential of additional residential demand through increased WFH for each municipality in the Munich Metropolitan Region. Crucially, a municipality’s potential depends on the number of commuting days per week. Keeping the weekly commuting time budget constant, an increase in WFH, or a reduction in commuting days allows a longer commuting time per trip. We visualise our results and sensitivities with maps. We observe a gradual yet discontinuous decay of potentials from the region’s core to the fringes with an increase in WFH days.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5306
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5306
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5306
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5306
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5306/5306
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Moser, Fabian Wenner, Alain Thierstein
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Moser, Fabian Wenner, Alain Thierstein
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 3 (2022): The Resilient Metropolis: Planning in an Era of Decentralization; 15-34
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130665218736128