CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.875 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The Mirizzi syndrome consists of the obstruction either of the common hepatic duct or the choledocus, secondary to the impact of calculus in the cystic duct or in the gallbladder infundibulum. According to the Csendes classification, Mirizzi syndrome is divided into five types that involve different surgical procedures. Materials and methods: After a literature review, fifteen patients with Mirizzi Syndrome are retrospectively described between 2008 and 2018 at the Unidade Saude da Guarda (ULSG). The clinical records were reviewed. Clinical data, gender, clinical condition, test results, operative procedures and type of Mirizzi syndrome (according to Csendes) were examined. Results: Of the 15 patients, 11 (73,3%) were women and 4 (26,7%) men. All of them (100%) showed abdominal pain, 14 (93,3%) nausea and vomit, 10 (66,7%) symptoms of cholangitis / acute cholecystitis, 5 (33%) recurrent jaundice, 4 (26,6%) choluria and weight loss and 2 (13,3%) itch. Every cases of Mirizzi syndrome was diagnosed intraoperatively and requiring conversion to laparotomy. Were identified 5(33,3%) cases with type III, 4 (26,6%) with type I, 3 (20%) with type II, 2 (13,3%) with type IV and 1 (6,7%) with type V. In 5 (33,3%) patients was treated with cholecystectomy and bilio-digestive anastomosis on Roux-en-Y, 3 (20%) by total cholecystectomy with Kher drain, 2 (13,3%) by total cholecystectomy, partial and partial with Kher drain, and finally 1 (6,6%) by cholecystectomy with Kher drain with suture of the gastric orifice. Conclusion: The treatment of Mirizzi Syndrome is a diagnosis and surgical challenge. Despite the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the laparotomic treatment of Mirizzi syndrome should be the standard procedure. |
id |
RCAP_f72bb1d6ad67d2870eae28accb6cc79d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista.spcir.com:article/875 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDYABORDAGEM CLÍNICA NA SÍNDROME DE MIRIZZI: ANÁLISE RETROSPETIVAIntroduction: The Mirizzi syndrome consists of the obstruction either of the common hepatic duct or the choledocus, secondary to the impact of calculus in the cystic duct or in the gallbladder infundibulum. According to the Csendes classification, Mirizzi syndrome is divided into five types that involve different surgical procedures. Materials and methods: After a literature review, fifteen patients with Mirizzi Syndrome are retrospectively described between 2008 and 2018 at the Unidade Saude da Guarda (ULSG). The clinical records were reviewed. Clinical data, gender, clinical condition, test results, operative procedures and type of Mirizzi syndrome (according to Csendes) were examined. Results: Of the 15 patients, 11 (73,3%) were women and 4 (26,7%) men. All of them (100%) showed abdominal pain, 14 (93,3%) nausea and vomit, 10 (66,7%) symptoms of cholangitis / acute cholecystitis, 5 (33%) recurrent jaundice, 4 (26,6%) choluria and weight loss and 2 (13,3%) itch. Every cases of Mirizzi syndrome was diagnosed intraoperatively and requiring conversion to laparotomy. Were identified 5(33,3%) cases with type III, 4 (26,6%) with type I, 3 (20%) with type II, 2 (13,3%) with type IV and 1 (6,7%) with type V. In 5 (33,3%) patients was treated with cholecystectomy and bilio-digestive anastomosis on Roux-en-Y, 3 (20%) by total cholecystectomy with Kher drain, 2 (13,3%) by total cholecystectomy, partial and partial with Kher drain, and finally 1 (6,6%) by cholecystectomy with Kher drain with suture of the gastric orifice. Conclusion: The treatment of Mirizzi Syndrome is a diagnosis and surgical challenge. Despite the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the laparotomic treatment of Mirizzi syndrome should be the standard procedure.Introdução: A Síndrome de Mirizzi resulta da compressão extrínseca do canal hepático comum (CHC) e/ou colédoco pela impactação de cálculos no canal cístico ou no infundíbulo da vesícula biliar. Segundo a classificação de Csendes, dividide-se em 5 tipos que implicam diferentes técnicas cirúrgicas. Materiais e Métodos: Após uma breve revisão bibliográfica, descrevem-se retrospetivamente quinze doentes diagnosticados com Síndrome de Mirizzi, entre 2008 e 2018, na Unidade Local de Saúde da Guarda (ULSG). A análise dos respectivos processos clínicos permitiu recolher dados relativamente ao género, quadro clínico, resultados de exames complementares de diagnóstico, momento do diagnóstico, tipo de síndrome de Mirizzi (segundo Csendes) e tratamento cirúrgico. Resultados: Dos 15 doentes, 11 (73,3%) eram mulheres e 4 (26,7%) homens. Todos os doentes (100%) apresentaram dor abdominal, 14 (93,3%) náuseas e vómitos, 10 (66,7%) sintomas de colangite/colecistite aguda, 5 (33%) icterícia recorrente, 4 (26,6%) colúria e emagrecimento e 2 (13,3%) prurido. O diagnóstico foi estabelecido, em todos os casos, intra-operatoriamente com necessidade de conversão para laparotomia, sendo: 5 (33,3%) do tipo III, 4 (26,6%) do tipo I, 3 (20%) do tipo II, 2 (13,3%) do tipo IV e 1 (6,7%) do tipo V. Foi realizada em 5 (33,3%) doentes colecistectomia com anastomose bilio-digestiva em Y de Roux, em 3 (20%) colecistectomia total com dreno de Kehr, em 2 (13,3%) colecistectomia total, parcial e parcial com dreno de Kehr e por fim, em 1 (6,6%) colecistectomia com dreno de Kehr com sutura de orifício gástrico. Conclusões: O tratamento da Síndrome de Mirizzi é um desafio diagnóstico e cirúrgico. Apesar da era da colecistectomia laparoscópica, a via laparotómica deve ser a via de abordagem de eleição para o tratamento cirúrgico desta entidade.Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2023-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.875https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.875Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 54 (2022): December; 55-61Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 54 (2022): December; 55-612183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/875https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/875/663Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorreia, Paulo CostaCoutinho, LilianaCaldes, PedroVale, Maria João2024-03-14T22:04:48Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/875Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T04:00:43.981735Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY ABORDAGEM CLÍNICA NA SÍNDROME DE MIRIZZI: ANÁLISE RETROSPETIVA |
title |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY |
spellingShingle |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY Correia, Paulo Costa |
title_short |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_full |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_fullStr |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_full_unstemmed |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_sort |
CLINICAL APPROACH IN MIRIZZI SYNDROME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY |
author |
Correia, Paulo Costa |
author_facet |
Correia, Paulo Costa Coutinho, Liliana Caldes, Pedro Vale, Maria João |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coutinho, Liliana Caldes, Pedro Vale, Maria João |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Correia, Paulo Costa Coutinho, Liliana Caldes, Pedro Vale, Maria João |
description |
Introduction: The Mirizzi syndrome consists of the obstruction either of the common hepatic duct or the choledocus, secondary to the impact of calculus in the cystic duct or in the gallbladder infundibulum. According to the Csendes classification, Mirizzi syndrome is divided into five types that involve different surgical procedures. Materials and methods: After a literature review, fifteen patients with Mirizzi Syndrome are retrospectively described between 2008 and 2018 at the Unidade Saude da Guarda (ULSG). The clinical records were reviewed. Clinical data, gender, clinical condition, test results, operative procedures and type of Mirizzi syndrome (according to Csendes) were examined. Results: Of the 15 patients, 11 (73,3%) were women and 4 (26,7%) men. All of them (100%) showed abdominal pain, 14 (93,3%) nausea and vomit, 10 (66,7%) symptoms of cholangitis / acute cholecystitis, 5 (33%) recurrent jaundice, 4 (26,6%) choluria and weight loss and 2 (13,3%) itch. Every cases of Mirizzi syndrome was diagnosed intraoperatively and requiring conversion to laparotomy. Were identified 5(33,3%) cases with type III, 4 (26,6%) with type I, 3 (20%) with type II, 2 (13,3%) with type IV and 1 (6,7%) with type V. In 5 (33,3%) patients was treated with cholecystectomy and bilio-digestive anastomosis on Roux-en-Y, 3 (20%) by total cholecystectomy with Kher drain, 2 (13,3%) by total cholecystectomy, partial and partial with Kher drain, and finally 1 (6,6%) by cholecystectomy with Kher drain with suture of the gastric orifice. Conclusion: The treatment of Mirizzi Syndrome is a diagnosis and surgical challenge. Despite the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the laparotomic treatment of Mirizzi syndrome should be the standard procedure. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-18 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.875 https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.875 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.875 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/875 https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/875/663 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 54 (2022): December; 55-61 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 54 (2022): December; 55-61 2183-1165 1646-6918 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138182345785344 |