Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mello, Amanda Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira, Robson Bruno Dutra, Lauro, Carlos Henrique, Brandão, Lincoln Cardoso, Davim, J. Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32725
Resumo: Titanium and its alloys are amongst the most important metallic materials used by many industries, such as those pertaining to the aerospace, automotive, and biomedical sectors. This is due to the reliability and functionality of titanium components, in addition to their high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance. Thus, titanium and its alloys are of great importance to the challenging operations of these sectors. The manufacturing of titanium requires great accuracy to ensure that resulting products meet quality requirements, due to its difficult machinability. In this study, the cutting forces and surface roughness of the turning were analysed to compare different titanium alloys, Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–6Al–7Nb, with CVD-coated and uncoated inserts. The effect of control factors on the response variables was measured using ANOVA. Response surface methodology was applied to the creation of a model of responses and to a bi-objective optimization process via the normalized normal constraint method. The Pareto-optimal sets of both alloys were achieved, which may be applied to practical situations to achieve optimal results for these responses. The models and optimization results confirmed the similarity of machinability values between the Ti–6Al–4 V and Ti–6Al–7Nb alloys. The uncoated inserts yielded the best surface roughness and cutting force results when used with both titanium alloys.
id RCAP_f745a5a6add0ff51d641161c0cdd8960
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/32725
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimizationTitanium alloysCutting forceSurface roughnesMulti-objective optimizationTitanium and its alloys are amongst the most important metallic materials used by many industries, such as those pertaining to the aerospace, automotive, and biomedical sectors. This is due to the reliability and functionality of titanium components, in addition to their high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance. Thus, titanium and its alloys are of great importance to the challenging operations of these sectors. The manufacturing of titanium requires great accuracy to ensure that resulting products meet quality requirements, due to its difficult machinability. In this study, the cutting forces and surface roughness of the turning were analysed to compare different titanium alloys, Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–6Al–7Nb, with CVD-coated and uncoated inserts. The effect of control factors on the response variables was measured using ANOVA. Response surface methodology was applied to the creation of a model of responses and to a bi-objective optimization process via the normalized normal constraint method. The Pareto-optimal sets of both alloys were achieved, which may be applied to practical situations to achieve optimal results for these responses. The models and optimization results confirmed the similarity of machinability values between the Ti–6Al–4 V and Ti–6Al–7Nb alloys. The uncoated inserts yielded the best surface roughness and cutting force results when used with both titanium alloys.Springer2021-12-13T11:11:26Z2021-10-26T00:00:00Z2021-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/32725eng1678-587810.1007/s40430-021-03216-wMello, Amanda OliveiraPereira, Robson Bruno DutraLauro, Carlos HenriqueBrandão, Lincoln CardosoDavim, J. Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:02:52Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/32725Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:04:14.578641Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
title Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
spellingShingle Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
Mello, Amanda Oliveira
Titanium alloys
Cutting force
Surface roughnes
Multi-objective optimization
title_short Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
title_full Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
title_fullStr Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
title_sort Comparison between the machinability of different titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb) employing the multi-objective optimization
author Mello, Amanda Oliveira
author_facet Mello, Amanda Oliveira
Pereira, Robson Bruno Dutra
Lauro, Carlos Henrique
Brandão, Lincoln Cardoso
Davim, J. Paulo
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Robson Bruno Dutra
Lauro, Carlos Henrique
Brandão, Lincoln Cardoso
Davim, J. Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mello, Amanda Oliveira
Pereira, Robson Bruno Dutra
Lauro, Carlos Henrique
Brandão, Lincoln Cardoso
Davim, J. Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Titanium alloys
Cutting force
Surface roughnes
Multi-objective optimization
topic Titanium alloys
Cutting force
Surface roughnes
Multi-objective optimization
description Titanium and its alloys are amongst the most important metallic materials used by many industries, such as those pertaining to the aerospace, automotive, and biomedical sectors. This is due to the reliability and functionality of titanium components, in addition to their high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance. Thus, titanium and its alloys are of great importance to the challenging operations of these sectors. The manufacturing of titanium requires great accuracy to ensure that resulting products meet quality requirements, due to its difficult machinability. In this study, the cutting forces and surface roughness of the turning were analysed to compare different titanium alloys, Ti–6Al–4V and Ti–6Al–7Nb, with CVD-coated and uncoated inserts. The effect of control factors on the response variables was measured using ANOVA. Response surface methodology was applied to the creation of a model of responses and to a bi-objective optimization process via the normalized normal constraint method. The Pareto-optimal sets of both alloys were achieved, which may be applied to practical situations to achieve optimal results for these responses. The models and optimization results confirmed the similarity of machinability values between the Ti–6Al–4 V and Ti–6Al–7Nb alloys. The uncoated inserts yielded the best surface roughness and cutting force results when used with both titanium alloys.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-13T11:11:26Z
2021-10-26T00:00:00Z
2021-10-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32725
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/32725
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1678-5878
10.1007/s40430-021-03216-w
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137698052571136