Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zarouali, Brahim
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Helberger, Natali, de Vreese, Claes H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
Resumo: Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.
id RCAP_f8a7159e498ff5763d4e6d2d798bfb4c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4090
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technologyAlgorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.Cogitatio2021-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4090Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Algorithmic Systems in the Digital Society; 134-1442183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090/4090Copyright (c) 2021 Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger, Claes H. de Vreesehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZarouali, BrahimHelberger, Natalide Vreese, Claes H.2022-12-20T10:59:02Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4090Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:13.955892Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
spellingShingle Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
Zarouali, Brahim
algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
title_short Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_full Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_fullStr Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_sort Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
author Zarouali, Brahim
author_facet Zarouali, Brahim
Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
author_role author
author2 Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zarouali, Brahim
Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
topic algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
description Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4090
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4090
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090/4090
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger, Claes H. de Vreese
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger, Claes H. de Vreese
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Algorithmic Systems in the Digital Society; 134-144
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130659449470976