Robotic4all project: Results of a hands-on robotic surgery training program

• Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Mário Rui
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Matos, José Novo de, Oliveira, António, Marinho, Ricardo, Cadime, Irene Maria Dias, Alves, Maria Palmira, Morales-Conde, Salvador, Castelo-Branco, Miguel
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83113
• topic: Simulation; Education; Laparoscopic suture; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery

Objective: Although robotic surgery adoption and its indications are growing worldwide, for multiple factors, including costs, there is a lack of training and experience. Our aim was to study the impact of a robotic introduction training program on gesture performance, such as suturing, in robot-naive individuals. Methods: Using the DaVinci robot, a 2-hour program was based on virtual reality and anatomical model exercises. All participants performed 3 repetitions of virtual reality exercises on the virtual simulator, and then performed and were assessed on 2 tests, ie robot and laparoscopic training box. After the course, the participants were surveyed for this training program. Results: Twenty-seven residents and surgeons were enrolled in the training program. With only 2 hours of training, all of the participants were able to complete the training program, thus learning generic and specific skills in robotic surgery. In virtual reality exercise, the scores of the 3 exercises increased significantly with every repetition (p < 0.001) and the size of the increase was large. The completion time on the robot platform was 2.6 times faster (169.33 ± 28.28 s vs. 447.96 ± 156.55 s, p < 0.001) than that in the laparoscopic box, and the difference between both types of tests was large (p h 2 ¼ 0.797). The centralization and passage of the needle were significantly better on the robot platform (5 vs. 3, p < 0.001, r ¼ 0.47; 5 vs. 4, p < 0.001, r ¼ 0.59) than in the laparoscopic box. For the intracorporeal stitchþknot test, every participant was able to perform the exercise on the robot but only 85.2% (23/27) in the laparoscopic box. Twenty-one participants answered the survey, and 13 (61.9%) of them consid- ered robotic performance independent of laparoscopic experience. Conclusions: Surgeons are interested and seek training in robotic surgery. We implemented the first hands-on robotic surgery training program in Portugal and participants considered it was important and adequate for its purpose. All participants, even without robotic experience, learned quicker, performed better, faster and more precisely on the robot over laparoscopy.