Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Geada, Nuno
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Mafra, Inês, Barroso, Rogério, Franco, José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118
Resumo: Introduction: Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing osteoporotic fracture, however atypical femoral fractures with a well-defined radiological pattern have been described in association with prolonged treatment with bisphosphonates. Our objectives in this study were to characterize patients ≥ 65 years old with femoral fractures (subtrochanteric/diaphyseal) considered typical and atypical and the relationship between the occurrence of atypical fractures and bisphosphonate use.Material and Methods: We conducted a case-control study with patients admitted in our hospital with subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur fracture in a period of five and a half years. After applying the exclusion criteria, the 92 fractures (91 patients) were classified as typical or atypical. The determination of prior bisphosphonate treatment was obtained through consultation of the individual medical history.Results: We found 11 atypical fractures (10 patients) and 81 typical fractures (81 patients). The median age of both groups was statistically different (72 years - atypical vs. 80 years - typical, p < 0.01). The reason for the use of bisphosphonates was 0.60 in atypical fractures and 0.01 in typical, and an odds ratio of 101.1 was obtained (p < 0.01).Discussion: Our results are supported and are in agreement with published studies relating to the occurrence of atypical femoral fractures associated with treatment with bisphosphonates.Conclusion: Despite the small number of cases it was possible to demonstrate a statistically significant relation between atypical femoral fractures and treatment with bisphosphonates. One should note that these atypical fractures occurred in patients significantly younger than patients with typical fractures.Keywords: Diphosphonates; Femoral Fractures; Risk Factors.
id RCAP_f9872e3d7af406671f8bd9c16a33ab9d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5118
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?Fracturas Femorais Atípicas e o Tratamento com Bifosfonatos: É um Factor de Risco?Introduction: Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing osteoporotic fracture, however atypical femoral fractures with a well-defined radiological pattern have been described in association with prolonged treatment with bisphosphonates. Our objectives in this study were to characterize patients ≥ 65 years old with femoral fractures (subtrochanteric/diaphyseal) considered typical and atypical and the relationship between the occurrence of atypical fractures and bisphosphonate use.Material and Methods: We conducted a case-control study with patients admitted in our hospital with subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur fracture in a period of five and a half years. After applying the exclusion criteria, the 92 fractures (91 patients) were classified as typical or atypical. The determination of prior bisphosphonate treatment was obtained through consultation of the individual medical history.Results: We found 11 atypical fractures (10 patients) and 81 typical fractures (81 patients). The median age of both groups was statistically different (72 years - atypical vs. 80 years - typical, p < 0.01). The reason for the use of bisphosphonates was 0.60 in atypical fractures and 0.01 in typical, and an odds ratio of 101.1 was obtained (p < 0.01).Discussion: Our results are supported and are in agreement with published studies relating to the occurrence of atypical femoral fractures associated with treatment with bisphosphonates.Conclusion: Despite the small number of cases it was possible to demonstrate a statistically significant relation between atypical femoral fractures and treatment with bisphosphonates. One should note that these atypical fractures occurred in patients significantly younger than patients with typical fractures.Keywords: Diphosphonates; Femoral Fractures; Risk Factors.Introdução: Os bifosfonatos têm eficácia comprovada na prevenção das fracturas osteoporóticas. Contudo, têm sido descritas fracturas femorais atípicas associadas à toma prolongada de bifosfonatos com um padrão radiológico bem definido. Os objectivos no nosso estudo foram caracterizar os doentes de idade ≥ 65 anos com fracturas femorais (subtrocantéricas/diafisárias) consideradas típicas e atípicas e avaliar a relação entre a ocorrência das fracturas atípicas e o uso de bifosfonatos.Material e Métodos: Realizámos um estudo caso-controlo com os doentes admitidos no nosso Hospital por fractura subtrocantérica ou diafisária do fémur, num período de cinco anos e meio. Após aplicação dos critérios de exclusão, as 92 fracturas (91 doentes) foram classificadas como atípicas ou típicas. A determinação do tratamento prévio com bifosfonatos foi obtida através do historial clínico dos doentes.Resultados: Foram encontradas 11 fracturas atípicas (10 doentes) e 81 fracturas típicas (81 doentes). A idade mediana entre os dois grupos foi estatisticamente diferente (72 anos - atípicas vs 80 anos - típicas, p < 0,01). A razão do uso de bifosfonatos foi de 0,60 nas fracturas atípicas e de 0,01 nas típicas, traduzindo um odds ratio de 101,1 (p < 0,01).Discussão: Na generalidade, os nossos resultados são apoiados e estão de acordo com os estudos publicados referentes à ocorrência de fracturas femorais atípicas associadas à toma de bifosfonatos.Conclusão: Apesar do pequeno número de casos foi possível demonstrar a relação, estatisticamente, significativa entre as fracturas femorais atípicas e a toma de bifosfonatos. De notar que estas fracturas atípicas ocorreram em doentes, significativamente, mais jovens do que os doentes com fracturas típicas.Palavras-chave: Difosfonatos; Fracturas do Fémur; Factores de Risco.Ordem dos Médicos2014-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpeghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5118Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 6 (2014): November-December; 704-709Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 6 (2014): Novembro-Dezembro; 704-7091646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/4169https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/4245https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7154https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7155https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7156https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7157https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7158https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7195Geada, NunoMafra, InêsBarroso, RogérioFranco, Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:04:13Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5118Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:02.022826Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
Fracturas Femorais Atípicas e o Tratamento com Bifosfonatos: É um Factor de Risco?
title Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
spellingShingle Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
Geada, Nuno
title_short Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
title_full Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
title_fullStr Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
title_full_unstemmed Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
title_sort Atypical Femoral Fractures and Bisphosphonates Treatment: Is it a Risk Factor?
author Geada, Nuno
author_facet Geada, Nuno
Mafra, Inês
Barroso, Rogério
Franco, José
author_role author
author2 Mafra, Inês
Barroso, Rogério
Franco, José
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Geada, Nuno
Mafra, Inês
Barroso, Rogério
Franco, José
description Introduction: Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing osteoporotic fracture, however atypical femoral fractures with a well-defined radiological pattern have been described in association with prolonged treatment with bisphosphonates. Our objectives in this study were to characterize patients ≥ 65 years old with femoral fractures (subtrochanteric/diaphyseal) considered typical and atypical and the relationship between the occurrence of atypical fractures and bisphosphonate use.Material and Methods: We conducted a case-control study with patients admitted in our hospital with subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur fracture in a period of five and a half years. After applying the exclusion criteria, the 92 fractures (91 patients) were classified as typical or atypical. The determination of prior bisphosphonate treatment was obtained through consultation of the individual medical history.Results: We found 11 atypical fractures (10 patients) and 81 typical fractures (81 patients). The median age of both groups was statistically different (72 years - atypical vs. 80 years - typical, p < 0.01). The reason for the use of bisphosphonates was 0.60 in atypical fractures and 0.01 in typical, and an odds ratio of 101.1 was obtained (p < 0.01).Discussion: Our results are supported and are in agreement with published studies relating to the occurrence of atypical femoral fractures associated with treatment with bisphosphonates.Conclusion: Despite the small number of cases it was possible to demonstrate a statistically significant relation between atypical femoral fractures and treatment with bisphosphonates. One should note that these atypical fractures occurred in patients significantly younger than patients with typical fractures.Keywords: Diphosphonates; Femoral Fractures; Risk Factors.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5118
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5118
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/4169
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/4245
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7154
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7155
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7156
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7157
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7158
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5118/7195
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 6 (2014): November-December; 704-709
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 6 (2014): Novembro-Dezembro; 704-709
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130641445421056