OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222020000200055 |
Resumo: | Abstract The objective of this paper is to show whether or not the Federal Supreme Court of Brazil can extend the cause of action in direct (or indirect) actions of constitutionality. How this extension can be made and whether the res judicata should be observed, given that such extension was used in a previous case, attacking the same infra-constitutional law. To do so, with simplicity, but not leaving the depth aside, we will use the issue with a focus on national jurisprudence, comparative law and various doctrines. Finally, we will address objective and subjective actions and how the “erga omnes” effect occurs in these types of actions; whether only the parts of that particular process suffer the effects of the decision rendered there, or if the whole society will benefit from what was decided in that action and in what way. |
id |
RCAP_fa99f36fae1b79df6693f2540104f815 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2183-95222020000200055 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THINGRes JudicataRight of ActionPreclusionEffectivenessPleadingAbstract The objective of this paper is to show whether or not the Federal Supreme Court of Brazil can extend the cause of action in direct (or indirect) actions of constitutionality. How this extension can be made and whether the res judicata should be observed, given that such extension was used in a previous case, attacking the same infra-constitutional law. To do so, with simplicity, but not leaving the depth aside, we will use the issue with a focus on national jurisprudence, comparative law and various doctrines. Finally, we will address objective and subjective actions and how the “erga omnes” effect occurs in these types of actions; whether only the parts of that particular process suffer the effects of the decision rendered there, or if the whole society will benefit from what was decided in that action and in what way.Editorial Juruá2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222020000200055Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito - Publicação Oficial do Conselho Internacional de Estudos Contemporâneos em Pós-Graduação n.11 2020reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222020000200055Santos,Maria Celeste Cordeiro Leite dosRocha,Paulo Muanis do Amaralinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:31:45Zoai:scielo:S2183-95222020000200055Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:34:43.902919Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING |
title |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING |
spellingShingle |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING Santos,Maria Celeste Cordeiro Leite dos Res Judicata Right of Action Preclusion Effectiveness Pleading |
title_short |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING |
title_full |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING |
title_fullStr |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING |
title_full_unstemmed |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING |
title_sort |
OPENING OF THE CASE OF ACTION AND PRECLUSIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE JUDGED THING |
author |
Santos,Maria Celeste Cordeiro Leite dos |
author_facet |
Santos,Maria Celeste Cordeiro Leite dos Rocha,Paulo Muanis do Amaral |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha,Paulo Muanis do Amaral |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Maria Celeste Cordeiro Leite dos Rocha,Paulo Muanis do Amaral |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Res Judicata Right of Action Preclusion Effectiveness Pleading |
topic |
Res Judicata Right of Action Preclusion Effectiveness Pleading |
description |
Abstract The objective of this paper is to show whether or not the Federal Supreme Court of Brazil can extend the cause of action in direct (or indirect) actions of constitutionality. How this extension can be made and whether the res judicata should be observed, given that such extension was used in a previous case, attacking the same infra-constitutional law. To do so, with simplicity, but not leaving the depth aside, we will use the issue with a focus on national jurisprudence, comparative law and various doctrines. Finally, we will address objective and subjective actions and how the “erga omnes” effect occurs in these types of actions; whether only the parts of that particular process suffer the effects of the decision rendered there, or if the whole society will benefit from what was decided in that action and in what way. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222020000200055 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222020000200055 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-95222020000200055 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editorial Juruá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editorial Juruá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito - Publicação Oficial do Conselho Internacional de Estudos Contemporâneos em Pós-Graduação n.11 2020 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137403088142336 |