On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/25810 |
Resumo: | In this paper we discuss the incompatibility between the notions of validity and impreciseness in the context of Dynamic Logics. To achieve that we consider the Łukasiewicz action lattice and its interval counterpart, we show how some validities fail in the context of intervals. In order to capture the properties of action lattices that remain valid for intervals we propose a new structure called Quasi-action Lattices which generalizes action lattices and is able to model both: The Łukasiewicz action lattice, Ł, and its interval counterpart, Łˆ. The notion of graded satisfaction relation is extended to quasi-action lattices. We demonstrate that, in the case of intervals, the relation of graded satisfaction is correct (cf. Theorem 3) with respect to the graded satisfaction relation on the Łukasiewicz action lattice. Although this theorem guarantees that satisfiability is preserved on intervals, we show that validity is not. We propose, then, to weaken the notion of validity on action lattices to designated validity on quasi-action lattices. In this context, Theorem 4 guarantees that the dynamic formulæ which are valid with respect to Ł will be designated valid with respect to Łˆ |
id |
RCAP_fab42bf6cbc5504b61e6555b1b39b646 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/25810 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action latticesDynamic logicFuzzy logicIntervalsIn this paper we discuss the incompatibility between the notions of validity and impreciseness in the context of Dynamic Logics. To achieve that we consider the Łukasiewicz action lattice and its interval counterpart, we show how some validities fail in the context of intervals. In order to capture the properties of action lattices that remain valid for intervals we propose a new structure called Quasi-action Lattices which generalizes action lattices and is able to model both: The Łukasiewicz action lattice, Ł, and its interval counterpart, Łˆ. The notion of graded satisfaction relation is extended to quasi-action lattices. We demonstrate that, in the case of intervals, the relation of graded satisfaction is correct (cf. Theorem 3) with respect to the graded satisfaction relation on the Łukasiewicz action lattice. Although this theorem guarantees that satisfiability is preserved on intervals, we show that validity is not. We propose, then, to weaken the notion of validity on action lattices to designated validity on quasi-action lattices. In this context, Theorem 4 guarantees that the dynamic formulæ which are valid with respect to Ł will be designated valid with respect to ŁˆElsevier2020-04-15T00:00:00Z2019-04-15T00:00:00Z2019-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/25810eng0167-642310.1016/j.scico.2019.01.007Santiago, RegivanBedregal, BenjamínMadeira, AlexandreMartins, Manuel A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T11:49:57Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/25810Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:58:55.314346Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices |
title |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices |
spellingShingle |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices Santiago, Regivan Dynamic logic Fuzzy logic Intervals |
title_short |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices |
title_full |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices |
title_fullStr |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices |
title_full_unstemmed |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices |
title_sort |
On interval dynamic logic: Introducing quasi-action lattices |
author |
Santiago, Regivan |
author_facet |
Santiago, Regivan Bedregal, Benjamín Madeira, Alexandre Martins, Manuel A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bedregal, Benjamín Madeira, Alexandre Martins, Manuel A. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santiago, Regivan Bedregal, Benjamín Madeira, Alexandre Martins, Manuel A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dynamic logic Fuzzy logic Intervals |
topic |
Dynamic logic Fuzzy logic Intervals |
description |
In this paper we discuss the incompatibility between the notions of validity and impreciseness in the context of Dynamic Logics. To achieve that we consider the Łukasiewicz action lattice and its interval counterpart, we show how some validities fail in the context of intervals. In order to capture the properties of action lattices that remain valid for intervals we propose a new structure called Quasi-action Lattices which generalizes action lattices and is able to model both: The Łukasiewicz action lattice, Ł, and its interval counterpart, Łˆ. The notion of graded satisfaction relation is extended to quasi-action lattices. We demonstrate that, in the case of intervals, the relation of graded satisfaction is correct (cf. Theorem 3) with respect to the graded satisfaction relation on the Łukasiewicz action lattice. Although this theorem guarantees that satisfiability is preserved on intervals, we show that validity is not. We propose, then, to weaken the notion of validity on action lattices to designated validity on quasi-action lattices. In this context, Theorem 4 guarantees that the dynamic formulæ which are valid with respect to Ł will be designated valid with respect to Łˆ |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-15T00:00:00Z 2019-04-15 2020-04-15T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/25810 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/25810 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0167-6423 10.1016/j.scico.2019.01.007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137643393449984 |