Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/5979 |
Resumo: | We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching. |
id |
RCAP_fb01a0d37fad743e68cc14a872e45f2c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/5979 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational declineProblem choiceResearch prioritiesResearch motivationPublish or perishWe examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching.Associação Nacional de Pós Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)IC-OnlineSerra, Fernando Antônio RibeiroFerreira, Manuel PortugalScafuto, Isabel Cristina2021-07-30T14:32:31Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/5979engSerra, F. A. R., Ferreira, M. P., & Scafuto, I. C. (2020). Why is academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline. Brazilian Administration Review, 17(4), e200005. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar20202000051807-769210.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-17T15:52:07Zoai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/5979Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:49:20.030726Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline |
title |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline |
spellingShingle |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline Serra, Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Problem choice Research priorities Research motivation Publish or perish |
title_short |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline |
title_full |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline |
title_fullStr |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline |
title_sort |
Why is Academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline |
author |
Serra, Fernando Antônio Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Serra, Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Ferreira, Manuel Portugal Scafuto, Isabel Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Manuel Portugal Scafuto, Isabel Cristina |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
IC-Online |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Serra, Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Ferreira, Manuel Portugal Scafuto, Isabel Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Problem choice Research priorities Research motivation Publish or perish |
topic |
Problem choice Research priorities Research motivation Publish or perish |
description |
We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021-07-30T14:32:31Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/5979 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/5979 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Serra, F. A. R., Ferreira, M. P., & Scafuto, I. C. (2020). Why is academia sometimes detached from firms’ problems? The unattractiveness of research on organizational decline. Brazilian Administration Review, 17(4), e200005. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005 1807-7692 10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Pós Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional de Pós Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136986075758592 |