Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fossum, John Erik
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vigrestad, Joachim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3713
Resumo: To what extent has Brexit affected Norwegians’ perceptions of their current relationship with the EU? What are the considerations that central political and societal actors bring up to explain their stances? What are the broader lessons for the EU’s relations with non-members? We argue that Norway’s EU affiliation is so close that we can draw on Catherine De Vries’ benchmark theory to assess whether Brexit affects Norwegians’ assessments of Norway’s relationship with the EU. We focus on the Norwegian government’s stance. Further, we consider opinion polls to understand the strength of domestic support for the EEA Agreement, and whether that support has changed as a consequence of Brexit. We thereafter look for political entrepreneurs or political change agents, in political parties, in interest groups, and among civil society activists. We find that Brexit has not served as a benchmark. It has not set in motion efforts to change Norway’s EU affiliation. Opponents diverge on alternatives, although share concerns about what they see as the EU’s neoliberal orientation. The analysis shows that we cannot assess Brexit as a benchmark without paying attention to the sheer size and magnitude of the EU–Norway power asymmetry.
id RCAP_fc3bf39791396bac267ffaf07dee4894
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3713
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexitbenchmark theory; Brexit; EEA Agreement; European Union; NorwayTo what extent has Brexit affected Norwegians’ perceptions of their current relationship with the EU? What are the considerations that central political and societal actors bring up to explain their stances? What are the broader lessons for the EU’s relations with non-members? We argue that Norway’s EU affiliation is so close that we can draw on Catherine De Vries’ benchmark theory to assess whether Brexit affects Norwegians’ assessments of Norway’s relationship with the EU. We focus on the Norwegian government’s stance. Further, we consider opinion polls to understand the strength of domestic support for the EEA Agreement, and whether that support has changed as a consequence of Brexit. We thereafter look for political entrepreneurs or political change agents, in political parties, in interest groups, and among civil society activists. We find that Brexit has not served as a benchmark. It has not set in motion efforts to change Norway’s EU affiliation. Opponents diverge on alternatives, although share concerns about what they see as the EU’s neoliberal orientation. The analysis shows that we cannot assess Brexit as a benchmark without paying attention to the sheer size and magnitude of the EU–Norway power asymmetry.Cogitatio2021-01-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3713oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3713Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): What Brexit Means for Europe: EU Institutions and Actors after the British Referendum; 79-892183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3713https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3713https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3713/3713Copyright (c) 2021 John Erik Fossum, Joachim Vigrestadhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFossum, John ErikVigrestad, Joachim2022-10-21T16:04:09Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3713Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:52.742720Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
title Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
spellingShingle Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
Fossum, John Erik
benchmark theory; Brexit; EEA Agreement; European Union; Norway
title_short Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
title_full Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
title_fullStr Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
title_full_unstemmed Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
title_sort Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians’ Assessments of Brexit
author Fossum, John Erik
author_facet Fossum, John Erik
Vigrestad, Joachim
author_role author
author2 Vigrestad, Joachim
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fossum, John Erik
Vigrestad, Joachim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv benchmark theory; Brexit; EEA Agreement; European Union; Norway
topic benchmark theory; Brexit; EEA Agreement; European Union; Norway
description To what extent has Brexit affected Norwegians’ perceptions of their current relationship with the EU? What are the considerations that central political and societal actors bring up to explain their stances? What are the broader lessons for the EU’s relations with non-members? We argue that Norway’s EU affiliation is so close that we can draw on Catherine De Vries’ benchmark theory to assess whether Brexit affects Norwegians’ assessments of Norway’s relationship with the EU. We focus on the Norwegian government’s stance. Further, we consider opinion polls to understand the strength of domestic support for the EEA Agreement, and whether that support has changed as a consequence of Brexit. We thereafter look for political entrepreneurs or political change agents, in political parties, in interest groups, and among civil society activists. We find that Brexit has not served as a benchmark. It has not set in motion efforts to change Norway’s EU affiliation. Opponents diverge on alternatives, although share concerns about what they see as the EU’s neoliberal orientation. The analysis shows that we cannot assess Brexit as a benchmark without paying attention to the sheer size and magnitude of the EU–Norway power asymmetry.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3713
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3713
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3713
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3713
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3713
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3713
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3713/3713
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 John Erik Fossum, Joachim Vigrestad
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 John Erik Fossum, Joachim Vigrestad
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): What Brexit Means for Europe: EU Institutions and Actors after the British Referendum; 79-89
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130591970459648