Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brink, Christiaan Willem
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Thomson, Robert Leslie, Amar, Arjun, Girardello, Marco, Santangeli, Andrea
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/6214
Resumo: The use of poison to eliminate predators is causing African vulture populations to collapse. To understand the prevalence and motivations of this practice we conducted an extensive survey with South African commercial farmers. Using a specialised questioning technique and ad hoc quantitative methods we found that an estimated 22% and 31% of farmers used poison over a 1-year and 5-year period, respectively. Poison use hotspots generally coincided with small stock farming areas. The strongest predictor of poison use was whether farmers believed the practice to be common amongst their peers. Our results suggest that farmers' attitudes to vultures are primarily positive, and farmers are less likely to use poisons if they frequently encounter vultures on their farm. Overall, our findings provide an understanding on poison use that provides leverage points to change farmers' behaviour and help avert the African vulture crisis and possible cascading ecosystem impacts.
id RCAP_fc9c4f86d92edb10b9dcec8ec04bfa7e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uac.pt:10400.3/6214
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measuresHuman-wildlife ConflictPredator ManagementVulture ConservationWildlife CrimeThe use of poison to eliminate predators is causing African vulture populations to collapse. To understand the prevalence and motivations of this practice we conducted an extensive survey with South African commercial farmers. Using a specialised questioning technique and ad hoc quantitative methods we found that an estimated 22% and 31% of farmers used poison over a 1-year and 5-year period, respectively. Poison use hotspots generally coincided with small stock farming areas. The strongest predictor of poison use was whether farmers believed the practice to be common amongst their peers. Our results suggest that farmers' attitudes to vultures are primarily positive, and farmers are less likely to use poisons if they frequently encounter vultures on their farm. Overall, our findings provide an understanding on poison use that provides leverage points to change farmers' behaviour and help avert the African vulture crisis and possible cascading ecosystem impacts.We would like to thank all respondents for their participation and the following individuals for their kind hospitality to a lonely researcher on the road: Vivienne and Mike van Breda, Kabous Louw, Sonja and Jutta Moxham and Rory Evans. Furthermore, Ben J. Dilley, for his carpentry skills and assistance in kitting out our research vehicle. This study was funded by the NRF-DST Centre of Excellence funding to the FitzPatrick Institute of Ornithology. AS was funded by the Academy of Finland (Grant No. 307909).SpringerRepositório da Universidade dos AçoresBrink, Christiaan WillemThomson, Robert LeslieAmar, ArjunGirardello, MarcoSantangeli, Andrea2022-03-03T18:13:20Z2021-012021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/6214engBrink C.W., Thomson R.L., Amar A., Girardello M. & Santangeli A. (2021). Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures. “Ambio”, 50(6), 1211-1221. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01461-20044-744710.1007/s13280-020-01461-21654-7209PMC806874933454916000608389200005metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-12-20T14:34:40Zoai:repositorio.uac.pt:10400.3/6214Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:28:22.881034Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
title Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
spellingShingle Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
Brink, Christiaan Willem
Human-wildlife Conflict
Predator Management
Vulture Conservation
Wildlife Crime
title_short Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
title_full Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
title_fullStr Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
title_sort Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures
author Brink, Christiaan Willem
author_facet Brink, Christiaan Willem
Thomson, Robert Leslie
Amar, Arjun
Girardello, Marco
Santangeli, Andrea
author_role author
author2 Thomson, Robert Leslie
Amar, Arjun
Girardello, Marco
Santangeli, Andrea
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade dos Açores
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brink, Christiaan Willem
Thomson, Robert Leslie
Amar, Arjun
Girardello, Marco
Santangeli, Andrea
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Human-wildlife Conflict
Predator Management
Vulture Conservation
Wildlife Crime
topic Human-wildlife Conflict
Predator Management
Vulture Conservation
Wildlife Crime
description The use of poison to eliminate predators is causing African vulture populations to collapse. To understand the prevalence and motivations of this practice we conducted an extensive survey with South African commercial farmers. Using a specialised questioning technique and ad hoc quantitative methods we found that an estimated 22% and 31% of farmers used poison over a 1-year and 5-year period, respectively. Poison use hotspots generally coincided with small stock farming areas. The strongest predictor of poison use was whether farmers believed the practice to be common amongst their peers. Our results suggest that farmers' attitudes to vultures are primarily positive, and farmers are less likely to use poisons if they frequently encounter vultures on their farm. Overall, our findings provide an understanding on poison use that provides leverage points to change farmers' behaviour and help avert the African vulture crisis and possible cascading ecosystem impacts.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-03-03T18:13:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/6214
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/6214
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brink C.W., Thomson R.L., Amar A., Girardello M. & Santangeli A. (2021). Prevalence and drivers of poison use by South African commercial farmers and perceptions of alternative livestock protection measures. “Ambio”, 50(6), 1211-1221. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01461-2
0044-7447
10.1007/s13280-020-01461-2
1654-7209
PMC8068749
33454916
000608389200005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130741014003712