Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ergas, Yasmine
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Kochkorova, Jazgul, Pető, Andrea, Trujillo, Natalia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5529
Resumo: This article explores the attacks to which gender studies programs in Central and Eastern Europe have been subject and the responses such attacks have elicited in the context of analogous phenomena in other parts of the world. The undermining of gender studies in recent years has been aggravated by the effects of the Covid‐19 pandemic that has exacerbated financial crises of educational institutions while also—in some contexts—providing cover for restrictions on academic freedom. Our specific focus here, however, is on how illiberal policies have limited the scope of academic gender studies, sometimes calling into question their very existence. To identify the modalities through which illiberal governments may narrow gender studies programs, we draw on Pirro and Stanley’s analysis of illiberal policymakers’ toolkit based on “forging,” “breaking,” and “bending.” We consider these categories useful for our analysis but add a fourth: “de‐specification”—a purposeful submersion, or redefinition, of gender studies into other programs, such as family studies. Our purpose is not to present an exhaustive analysis but rather to delineate a framework for analyzing such attacks and the responses to which they have given rise, and then to indicate some questions for further research. As such, this article should be read as a work in progress that seeks to explicate the modalities of the attacks on gender studies in higher education to which contemporary illiberalism has given rise concomitantly with attacks on gender rights and emerging forms of resistance that bespeak the resilience of the gender academy.
id RCAP_feb849db1b4c227c7e4559da4297361f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5529
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledgeanti‐gender attacks; Eastern Europe; gender studies; illiberalism; resilience; resistanceThis article explores the attacks to which gender studies programs in Central and Eastern Europe have been subject and the responses such attacks have elicited in the context of analogous phenomena in other parts of the world. The undermining of gender studies in recent years has been aggravated by the effects of the Covid‐19 pandemic that has exacerbated financial crises of educational institutions while also—in some contexts—providing cover for restrictions on academic freedom. Our specific focus here, however, is on how illiberal policies have limited the scope of academic gender studies, sometimes calling into question their very existence. To identify the modalities through which illiberal governments may narrow gender studies programs, we draw on Pirro and Stanley’s analysis of illiberal policymakers’ toolkit based on “forging,” “breaking,” and “bending.” We consider these categories useful for our analysis but add a fourth: “de‐specification”—a purposeful submersion, or redefinition, of gender studies into other programs, such as family studies. Our purpose is not to present an exhaustive analysis but rather to delineate a framework for analyzing such attacks and the responses to which they have given rise, and then to indicate some questions for further research. As such, this article should be read as a work in progress that seeks to explicate the modalities of the attacks on gender studies in higher education to which contemporary illiberalism has given rise concomitantly with attacks on gender rights and emerging forms of resistance that bespeak the resilience of the gender academy.Cogitatio2022-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5529oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5529Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): Gender and Illiberalism in Post-Communist Europe; 121-1312183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5529https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5529https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5529/5529Copyright (c) 2022 Yasmine Ergas, Jazgul Kochkorova, Andrea Pető, Natalia Trujilloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessErgas, YasmineKochkorova, JazgulPető, AndreaTrujillo, Natalia2022-12-22T15:16:51Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5529Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:31.475109Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
title Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
spellingShingle Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
Ergas, Yasmine
anti‐gender attacks; Eastern Europe; gender studies; illiberalism; resilience; resistance
title_short Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
title_full Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
title_fullStr Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
title_sort Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge
author Ergas, Yasmine
author_facet Ergas, Yasmine
Kochkorova, Jazgul
Pető, Andrea
Trujillo, Natalia
author_role author
author2 Kochkorova, Jazgul
Pető, Andrea
Trujillo, Natalia
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ergas, Yasmine
Kochkorova, Jazgul
Pető, Andrea
Trujillo, Natalia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv anti‐gender attacks; Eastern Europe; gender studies; illiberalism; resilience; resistance
topic anti‐gender attacks; Eastern Europe; gender studies; illiberalism; resilience; resistance
description This article explores the attacks to which gender studies programs in Central and Eastern Europe have been subject and the responses such attacks have elicited in the context of analogous phenomena in other parts of the world. The undermining of gender studies in recent years has been aggravated by the effects of the Covid‐19 pandemic that has exacerbated financial crises of educational institutions while also—in some contexts—providing cover for restrictions on academic freedom. Our specific focus here, however, is on how illiberal policies have limited the scope of academic gender studies, sometimes calling into question their very existence. To identify the modalities through which illiberal governments may narrow gender studies programs, we draw on Pirro and Stanley’s analysis of illiberal policymakers’ toolkit based on “forging,” “breaking,” and “bending.” We consider these categories useful for our analysis but add a fourth: “de‐specification”—a purposeful submersion, or redefinition, of gender studies into other programs, such as family studies. Our purpose is not to present an exhaustive analysis but rather to delineate a framework for analyzing such attacks and the responses to which they have given rise, and then to indicate some questions for further research. As such, this article should be read as a work in progress that seeks to explicate the modalities of the attacks on gender studies in higher education to which contemporary illiberalism has given rise concomitantly with attacks on gender rights and emerging forms of resistance that bespeak the resilience of the gender academy.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5529
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5529
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5529
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5529
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5529
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5529/5529
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Yasmine Ergas, Jazgul Kochkorova, Andrea Pető, Natalia Trujillo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Yasmine Ergas, Jazgul Kochkorova, Andrea Pető, Natalia Trujillo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): Gender and Illiberalism in Post-Communist Europe; 121-131
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130671077130240