Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lídia Maria Azevedo Faria
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128792
Resumo: Background and Aims: Population-based gastric cancer (GC) screening is recommended in high-risk populations, although screening methods and intervals vary. In intermediate-risk populations, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening may be considered depending on resources. The aim of this study was to characterize GC screening programs worldwide. Methods: Studies regarding population-based GC screening were searched through MEDLINE and Scopus. Studies on symptomatic patients, premalignant lesions, hereditary GC and GC surveillance were excluded. The following outcomes were analysed: adherence rate, early-GC detection rate and GC detection rate. Additionally, a survey on digestive cancer screening was sent to Endoscopy/Gastroenterology societies. Results: 44 studies were included. Population-based screening by upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) or EGD is offered in Japan and Korea, with adherence rates between 14.31-58.01% and 7.40-74.8%, respectively. Japan reported early-GC detection rates of 0.02-0.21% and 0.35-0.66% and detection rates of 0.05-0.52% and 0.40-0.87%, for UGIS and EGD, respectively. Korea reported an EGD early-GC detection of 0.22% and detection rates between 0.01-0.29% and 0.07-0.08%, for EGD and UGIS, respectively. China offers EGD screening, with an adherence rate of 18.41% and early-GC and detection rates of 0.23-0.67% and 0.09-0.85%, respectively. In Western, several screening methods were used in pilot studies. Regarding the survey, only Serbia and Sweden reported the existence of a screening program. Discussion: Mass screening for GC is available in Japan, Korea and China. Endoscopy-based programs seem to achieve higher early-GC and GC detection rates rather than UGIS, with variable adherence rates.
id RCAP_ff4eb4ea05216f1a1aa4c7bc0c523380
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128792
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Gastric cancer screening : a systematic reviewMedicina clínicaClinical medicineBackground and Aims: Population-based gastric cancer (GC) screening is recommended in high-risk populations, although screening methods and intervals vary. In intermediate-risk populations, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening may be considered depending on resources. The aim of this study was to characterize GC screening programs worldwide. Methods: Studies regarding population-based GC screening were searched through MEDLINE and Scopus. Studies on symptomatic patients, premalignant lesions, hereditary GC and GC surveillance were excluded. The following outcomes were analysed: adherence rate, early-GC detection rate and GC detection rate. Additionally, a survey on digestive cancer screening was sent to Endoscopy/Gastroenterology societies. Results: 44 studies were included. Population-based screening by upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) or EGD is offered in Japan and Korea, with adherence rates between 14.31-58.01% and 7.40-74.8%, respectively. Japan reported early-GC detection rates of 0.02-0.21% and 0.35-0.66% and detection rates of 0.05-0.52% and 0.40-0.87%, for UGIS and EGD, respectively. Korea reported an EGD early-GC detection of 0.22% and detection rates between 0.01-0.29% and 0.07-0.08%, for EGD and UGIS, respectively. China offers EGD screening, with an adherence rate of 18.41% and early-GC and detection rates of 0.23-0.67% and 0.09-0.85%, respectively. In Western, several screening methods were used in pilot studies. Regarding the survey, only Serbia and Sweden reported the existence of a screening program. Discussion: Mass screening for GC is available in Japan, Korea and China. Endoscopy-based programs seem to achieve higher early-GC and GC detection rates rather than UGIS, with variable adherence rates.2020-06-222020-06-22T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/128792TID:202615057engLídia Maria Azevedo Fariainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T13:40:07Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/128792Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:45:12.525494Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
title Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
spellingShingle Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
Lídia Maria Azevedo Faria
Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
title_short Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
title_full Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
title_fullStr Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
title_sort Gastric cancer screening : a systematic review
author Lídia Maria Azevedo Faria
author_facet Lídia Maria Azevedo Faria
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lídia Maria Azevedo Faria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
topic Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
description Background and Aims: Population-based gastric cancer (GC) screening is recommended in high-risk populations, although screening methods and intervals vary. In intermediate-risk populations, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening may be considered depending on resources. The aim of this study was to characterize GC screening programs worldwide. Methods: Studies regarding population-based GC screening were searched through MEDLINE and Scopus. Studies on symptomatic patients, premalignant lesions, hereditary GC and GC surveillance were excluded. The following outcomes were analysed: adherence rate, early-GC detection rate and GC detection rate. Additionally, a survey on digestive cancer screening was sent to Endoscopy/Gastroenterology societies. Results: 44 studies were included. Population-based screening by upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) or EGD is offered in Japan and Korea, with adherence rates between 14.31-58.01% and 7.40-74.8%, respectively. Japan reported early-GC detection rates of 0.02-0.21% and 0.35-0.66% and detection rates of 0.05-0.52% and 0.40-0.87%, for UGIS and EGD, respectively. Korea reported an EGD early-GC detection of 0.22% and detection rates between 0.01-0.29% and 0.07-0.08%, for EGD and UGIS, respectively. China offers EGD screening, with an adherence rate of 18.41% and early-GC and detection rates of 0.23-0.67% and 0.09-0.85%, respectively. In Western, several screening methods were used in pilot studies. Regarding the survey, only Serbia and Sweden reported the existence of a screening program. Discussion: Mass screening for GC is available in Japan, Korea and China. Endoscopy-based programs seem to achieve higher early-GC and GC detection rates rather than UGIS, with variable adherence rates.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-22
2020-06-22T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128792
TID:202615057
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/128792
identifier_str_mv TID:202615057
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135769072238592