Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leal, Daniela Alexandra Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/124289
Resumo: Ecotoxicological testing of chemicals have traditionally focused on the bioassay approach, where the ecotoxicity of a compound is evaluated on only a single species at the time in the laboratory. However, natural ecosystems are must more complex and include species interactions and the influence of ambient environmental factors. On the other hand, the evaluation of the toxic effects in the field has the disadvantage that this complexity hampers the interpretation of the correlations of treatment-related effects of individual stressors, and it is very hard to find a non-polluted field site. Model ecosystems, also referred to as microcosms and mesocosms, are experimental ecosystems that are constructed with components of natural ecosystems. This experimental design allows the evaluation of the correlations of treatment-related effects (when compared to field trials) with a higher ecological realism (when compared with laboratory bioassay tests). Thus, the model ecosystems have often been used to evaluate how the natural ecosystems function and how the exposure to toxic elements or potentially toxic elements influences ecosystem structure and functioning. The Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) is the minimum difference between the control and treatments with a compound under study that must exist to be statistically significant. This indicator was developed in order to provide a measure for the statistical power of microcosms and mesocosms experiments. However, few MDD calculations on model ecosystem studies have been made so far. Therefore, the aim of this thesis work was to evaluate the influence of the experimental design of the previously conducted microcosms and mesocosms experiments on their MDD values. The method presented in the Aquatic Guidance document for pesticides was used to calculate and compare MDD values from model ecosystem studies previously conducted with the same pesticide (the insecticide chlorpyrifos) in the Netherlands and Thailand. MDD values reported in previously published papers dealing with model ecosystems were also procured and compared. From these calculated and compiled MDD values, several factors that potentially increase or decrease the MDD values were identified. Several directions for future research based on the study findings are provided in the last section of this thesis.
id RCAP_ffae4beb995ac052a26bcabf60af2ab5
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/124289
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designsDomínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do AmbienteEcotoxicological testing of chemicals have traditionally focused on the bioassay approach, where the ecotoxicity of a compound is evaluated on only a single species at the time in the laboratory. However, natural ecosystems are must more complex and include species interactions and the influence of ambient environmental factors. On the other hand, the evaluation of the toxic effects in the field has the disadvantage that this complexity hampers the interpretation of the correlations of treatment-related effects of individual stressors, and it is very hard to find a non-polluted field site. Model ecosystems, also referred to as microcosms and mesocosms, are experimental ecosystems that are constructed with components of natural ecosystems. This experimental design allows the evaluation of the correlations of treatment-related effects (when compared to field trials) with a higher ecological realism (when compared with laboratory bioassay tests). Thus, the model ecosystems have often been used to evaluate how the natural ecosystems function and how the exposure to toxic elements or potentially toxic elements influences ecosystem structure and functioning. The Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) is the minimum difference between the control and treatments with a compound under study that must exist to be statistically significant. This indicator was developed in order to provide a measure for the statistical power of microcosms and mesocosms experiments. However, few MDD calculations on model ecosystem studies have been made so far. Therefore, the aim of this thesis work was to evaluate the influence of the experimental design of the previously conducted microcosms and mesocosms experiments on their MDD values. The method presented in the Aquatic Guidance document for pesticides was used to calculate and compare MDD values from model ecosystem studies previously conducted with the same pesticide (the insecticide chlorpyrifos) in the Netherlands and Thailand. MDD values reported in previously published papers dealing with model ecosystems were also procured and compared. From these calculated and compiled MDD values, several factors that potentially increase or decrease the MDD values were identified. Several directions for future research based on the study findings are provided in the last section of this thesis.O estudo de ecotoxicologia de substâncias químicas tem-se focado na abordagem de bioensaios, onde a toxicidade de um composto é avaliada numa única espécie em laboratório. No entanto, os ecossistemas naturais, são sistemas extremamente complexos, onde várias espécies interagem entre si e entre os componentes abióticos. Por outro lado, a avaliação dos efeitos de toxicidade no meio natural, ou seja, estudos de campo, tem como desvantagens a complexidade do mesmo, o que dificulta a interpretação das correlações de casuais entre exposição e efeitos de compostos individuais, e é bastante difícil encontrar um local em condições pristinas. Modelos de ecossistemas, também referidos como microcosmos e mesocosmos, são ecossistemas experimentais que são construídos com componentes de ecossistemas naturais. Este desenho experimental, permite a avaliação das correlações casuais entre exposição e efeitos (quando comparados a estudos de campo) com algum realismo ecológico (quando comparados com os bioensaios em laboratório). Assim, os modelos de ecossistemas são fundamentais para perceber como funcionam os ecossistemas naturais e como a exposição a elementos tóxicos ou potencialmente tóxicos influencia o funcionamento e estruturas dos ecossistemas. O Minimum Detectable Difference é a diferença mínima entre o controlo e os meios de tratamento para o composto estudado que deve de existir para ser estatisticamente significante. Este indicador foi desenvolvido de modo a proporcionar uma unidade de medida para o poder estatístico das experiências com microcosmos e mesocosmos. No entanto, são poucos os cálculos de MDD em modelos de ecossistemas experimentais. Assim, o objetivo desta dissertação é avaliar a influencia dos desenhos experimentais de estudos previamente realizados, com modelos de microcosmos e mesocosmos, podem ter nos seus valores de MDD. O método apresentado pela EFSA em 2013, para pesticidas foi usado para o cálculo e comparação dos valores de MDD para os estudos com modelos de ecossistemas previamente realizados, com o pesticida clorpirifos, na Holanda e na Tailândia. Foram, também, procurados e posteriormente comparados os valores de MDD já calculados em estudos publicados. Desta análise de valores de MDD, foi possível identificar vários fatores que podem influenciar positivamente ou negativamente os valores de MDD. Na parte final desta dissertação, são fornecidas perspectivas futuras baseadas nas conclusões deste estudo.Daam, MichielRodrigues, AntónioRUNLeal, Daniela Alexandra Mendes2021-09-09T12:37:27Z2021-042021-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/124289enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:05:47Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/124289Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:45:26.017021Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
title Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
spellingShingle Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
Leal, Daniela Alexandra Mendes
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do Ambiente
title_short Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
title_full Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
title_fullStr Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
title_full_unstemmed Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
title_sort Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) in model ecosystems with different experimental designs
author Leal, Daniela Alexandra Mendes
author_facet Leal, Daniela Alexandra Mendes
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Daam, Michiel
Rodrigues, António
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leal, Daniela Alexandra Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do Ambiente
topic Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do Ambiente
description Ecotoxicological testing of chemicals have traditionally focused on the bioassay approach, where the ecotoxicity of a compound is evaluated on only a single species at the time in the laboratory. However, natural ecosystems are must more complex and include species interactions and the influence of ambient environmental factors. On the other hand, the evaluation of the toxic effects in the field has the disadvantage that this complexity hampers the interpretation of the correlations of treatment-related effects of individual stressors, and it is very hard to find a non-polluted field site. Model ecosystems, also referred to as microcosms and mesocosms, are experimental ecosystems that are constructed with components of natural ecosystems. This experimental design allows the evaluation of the correlations of treatment-related effects (when compared to field trials) with a higher ecological realism (when compared with laboratory bioassay tests). Thus, the model ecosystems have often been used to evaluate how the natural ecosystems function and how the exposure to toxic elements or potentially toxic elements influences ecosystem structure and functioning. The Minimum Detectable Difference (MDD) is the minimum difference between the control and treatments with a compound under study that must exist to be statistically significant. This indicator was developed in order to provide a measure for the statistical power of microcosms and mesocosms experiments. However, few MDD calculations on model ecosystem studies have been made so far. Therefore, the aim of this thesis work was to evaluate the influence of the experimental design of the previously conducted microcosms and mesocosms experiments on their MDD values. The method presented in the Aquatic Guidance document for pesticides was used to calculate and compare MDD values from model ecosystem studies previously conducted with the same pesticide (the insecticide chlorpyrifos) in the Netherlands and Thailand. MDD values reported in previously published papers dealing with model ecosystems were also procured and compared. From these calculated and compiled MDD values, several factors that potentially increase or decrease the MDD values were identified. Several directions for future research based on the study findings are provided in the last section of this thesis.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-09T12:37:27Z
2021-04
2021-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/124289
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/124289
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138058977673216