Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bagante, F
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Spolverato, G, Weiss, M, Alexandrescu, S, Pinto Marques, H, Aldrighetti, L, Maithel, SK, Pulitano, C, Bauer, TW, Shen, F, Poultsides, GA, Soubrane, O, Martel, G, Groot Koerkamp, B, Guglielmi, A, Itaru, E, Pawlik, TM
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3205
Summary: INTRODUCTION: The role of routine lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still controversial. The AJCC eighth edition recommends a minimum of six harvested lymph nodes (HLNs) for adequate nodal staging. We sought to define outcome and risk of death among patients who were staged with ≥6 HLNs versus <6 HLNs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC between 1990 and 2015 at 1 of the 14 major hepatobiliary centers were identified. RESULTS: Among 1154 patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC, 515 (44.6%) had lymphadenectomy. On final pathology, 200 (17.3%) patients had metastatic lymph node (MLN), while 315 (27.3%) had negative lymph node (NLN). Among NLN patients, HLN was associated with 5-year OS (p = 0.098). While HLN did not impact 5-year OS among MLN patients (p = 0.71), the number of MLN was associated with 5-year OS (p = 0.02). Among the 317 (27.5%) patients staged according the AJCC eighth edition staging system, N1 patients had a 3-fold increased risk of death compared with N0 patients (hazard ratio 3.03; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Only one fourth of patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC had adequate nodal staging according to the AJCC eighth edition. While the six HLN cutoff value impacted prognosis of N0 patients, the number of MLN rather than HLN was associated with long-term survival of N1 patients.
id RCAP_ffd77c7d523968824bf0b4be265e3915
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3205
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging SystemHCC CIRICCBile Duct Neoplasms/pathologyBile Duct Neoplasms/surgeryBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinoma/secondaryCholangiocarcinoma/surgeryHepatectomyLymph Node ExcisionLymph Nodes/pathologyLymph Nodes/surgeryLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisSurvival RateNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsINTRODUCTION: The role of routine lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still controversial. The AJCC eighth edition recommends a minimum of six harvested lymph nodes (HLNs) for adequate nodal staging. We sought to define outcome and risk of death among patients who were staged with ≥6 HLNs versus <6 HLNs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC between 1990 and 2015 at 1 of the 14 major hepatobiliary centers were identified. RESULTS: Among 1154 patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC, 515 (44.6%) had lymphadenectomy. On final pathology, 200 (17.3%) patients had metastatic lymph node (MLN), while 315 (27.3%) had negative lymph node (NLN). Among NLN patients, HLN was associated with 5-year OS (p = 0.098). While HLN did not impact 5-year OS among MLN patients (p = 0.71), the number of MLN was associated with 5-year OS (p = 0.02). Among the 317 (27.5%) patients staged according the AJCC eighth edition staging system, N1 patients had a 3-fold increased risk of death compared with N0 patients (hazard ratio 3.03; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Only one fourth of patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC had adequate nodal staging according to the AJCC eighth edition. While the six HLN cutoff value impacted prognosis of N0 patients, the number of MLN rather than HLN was associated with long-term survival of N1 patients.SpringerRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEBagante, FSpolverato, GWeiss, MAlexandrescu, SPinto Marques, HAldrighetti, LMaithel, SKPulitano, CBauer, TWShen, FPoultsides, GASoubrane, OMartel, GGroot Koerkamp, BGuglielmi, AItaru, EPawlik, TM2019-03-21T10:17:55Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3205engJ Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):52-59.10.1007/s11605-017-3426-xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:41:48Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/3205Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:32.014778Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
title Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
spellingShingle Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
Bagante, F
HCC CIR
ICC
Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
Cholangiocarcinoma/secondary
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
Hepatectomy
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes/pathology
Lymph Nodes/surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Neoplasm Staging
Proportional Hazards Models
title_short Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
title_full Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
title_fullStr Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
title_sort Assessment of the Lymph Node Status in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: the New Eighth Edition AJCC Staging System
author Bagante, F
author_facet Bagante, F
Spolverato, G
Weiss, M
Alexandrescu, S
Pinto Marques, H
Aldrighetti, L
Maithel, SK
Pulitano, C
Bauer, TW
Shen, F
Poultsides, GA
Soubrane, O
Martel, G
Groot Koerkamp, B
Guglielmi, A
Itaru, E
Pawlik, TM
author_role author
author2 Spolverato, G
Weiss, M
Alexandrescu, S
Pinto Marques, H
Aldrighetti, L
Maithel, SK
Pulitano, C
Bauer, TW
Shen, F
Poultsides, GA
Soubrane, O
Martel, G
Groot Koerkamp, B
Guglielmi, A
Itaru, E
Pawlik, TM
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bagante, F
Spolverato, G
Weiss, M
Alexandrescu, S
Pinto Marques, H
Aldrighetti, L
Maithel, SK
Pulitano, C
Bauer, TW
Shen, F
Poultsides, GA
Soubrane, O
Martel, G
Groot Koerkamp, B
Guglielmi, A
Itaru, E
Pawlik, TM
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HCC CIR
ICC
Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
Cholangiocarcinoma/secondary
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
Hepatectomy
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes/pathology
Lymph Nodes/surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Neoplasm Staging
Proportional Hazards Models
topic HCC CIR
ICC
Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
Cholangiocarcinoma/secondary
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
Hepatectomy
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes/pathology
Lymph Nodes/surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Neoplasm Staging
Proportional Hazards Models
description INTRODUCTION: The role of routine lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still controversial. The AJCC eighth edition recommends a minimum of six harvested lymph nodes (HLNs) for adequate nodal staging. We sought to define outcome and risk of death among patients who were staged with ≥6 HLNs versus <6 HLNs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC between 1990 and 2015 at 1 of the 14 major hepatobiliary centers were identified. RESULTS: Among 1154 patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC, 515 (44.6%) had lymphadenectomy. On final pathology, 200 (17.3%) patients had metastatic lymph node (MLN), while 315 (27.3%) had negative lymph node (NLN). Among NLN patients, HLN was associated with 5-year OS (p = 0.098). While HLN did not impact 5-year OS among MLN patients (p = 0.71), the number of MLN was associated with 5-year OS (p = 0.02). Among the 317 (27.5%) patients staged according the AJCC eighth edition staging system, N1 patients had a 3-fold increased risk of death compared with N0 patients (hazard ratio 3.03; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Only one fourth of patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC had adequate nodal staging according to the AJCC eighth edition. While the six HLN cutoff value impacted prognosis of N0 patients, the number of MLN rather than HLN was associated with long-term survival of N1 patients.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-03-21T10:17:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3205
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3205
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):52-59.
10.1007/s11605-017-3426-x
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131301755748352