Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Natasha Cordeiro dos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Soares, Neila Silva, Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta dos, Matos, Bruno Souza de, Carvalho, Daiane Barros
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Ciências em Saúde
Texto Completo: https://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/960
Resumo: Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the functional tests validated in different profiles of hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and to evaluate the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity. Methods: This is a systematic review. The databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, Lilacs and SciELO were used with the descriptors Functional Tests (Walk Test, Gait Speed ​​Test, Chair Stand Test, Timed Up and Go, Step Test), Validation Studies as Topic and synonyms. Validation studies of functional tests were included in hospitalized or non-hospitalized individuals who used the criteria of validity and/or reliability and related the tests to different variables. These articles could be longitudinal or cross-sectional observational or validation studies that used data from clinical trials. Articles that did not present significant characteristics of the sample and the description of the test were excluded. Results: The search resulted in 36,150 articles, and 89 were included. The studies were organized in tables with information such as author, year, validation criteria, sample, test, associated variables and results. The quality of the articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Conclusion: Functional tests are valid and reliable for assessing hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and are associated with muscle strength, ability to walk, postural control, activities of daily living, risk of falls, hospitalization, and mortality.
id RCS_a08732f332589ffbc2cf05d0b37ed79a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br:article/960
network_acronym_str RCS
network_name_str Revista Ciências em Saúde
repository_id_str
spelling Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic reviewTestes funcionais validados em indivíduos hospitalizados e não hospitalizados: revisão sistemáticaphysical functional performancevalidation studiesreproducibility of resultsdesempenho físico funcionalestudos de validaçãoreprodutibilidade dos testesObjective: To conduct a systematic review of the functional tests validated in different profiles of hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and to evaluate the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity. Methods: This is a systematic review. The databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, Lilacs and SciELO were used with the descriptors Functional Tests (Walk Test, Gait Speed ​​Test, Chair Stand Test, Timed Up and Go, Step Test), Validation Studies as Topic and synonyms. Validation studies of functional tests were included in hospitalized or non-hospitalized individuals who used the criteria of validity and/or reliability and related the tests to different variables. These articles could be longitudinal or cross-sectional observational or validation studies that used data from clinical trials. Articles that did not present significant characteristics of the sample and the description of the test were excluded. Results: The search resulted in 36,150 articles, and 89 were included. The studies were organized in tables with information such as author, year, validation criteria, sample, test, associated variables and results. The quality of the articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Conclusion: Functional tests are valid and reliable for assessing hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and are associated with muscle strength, ability to walk, postural control, activities of daily living, risk of falls, hospitalization, and mortality.Objetivo: Realizar uma revisão sistemática sobre os testes funcionais validados em diferentes perfis de indivíduos hospitalizados e não hospitalizados e avaliar as evidências psicométricas para confiabilidade e validade. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática. Foram utilizadas as bases de dados EMBASE, MEDLINE, Lilacs e SciELO com as palavras-chave Functional Tests (Walk Test, Gait Speed Test, Chair Stand Test, Timed Up And Go, Step Test),Validation Studies as Topic e sinônimos. Foram incluídos estudos de validação de testes funcionais em indivíduos hospitalizados ou não hospitalizados que utilizaram os critérios de validade e/ou confiabilidade e relacionaram os testes a diferentes variáveis. Esses artigos poderiam ser observacionais longitudinais ou de corte transversal ou estudos de validação que utilizaram dados de ensaios clínicos. Foram excluídos os artigos que não apresentaram características importantes da amostra e a descrição do teste. Resultados: A pesquisa resultou em 36.150 artigos, e 89 foram incluídos. Os estudos foram organizados em tabelas com informações como autor, ano; critérios de validação; amostra; teste; variáveis associadas; resultados. A qualidade dos artigos foi avaliada por meio da Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Conclusão: Os testes funcionais são válidos e confiáveis para a avaliação de indivíduos hospitalizados e não hospitalizados, estando associados à força muscular, capacidade de caminhar, controle postural, atividades de vida diária, risco de quedas, hospitalização e mortalidade.AISI/HCI2020-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedAvaliado pelos parestextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/96010.21876/rcshci.v10i4.960Revista Ciências em Saúde; v. 10 n. 4 (2020): Outubro a Dezembro de 2020; 23-53Health Sciences Journal; Vol 10 No 4 (2020): October to December 2020; 23-532236-378510.21876/rcshci.v10i4reponame:Revista Ciências em Saúdeinstname:Hospital de Clínicas de Itajubáinstacron:HCIporhttps://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/960/611Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA CIÊNCIAS EM SAÚDEhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Natasha Cordeiro dosSoares, Neila Silva Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta dos Matos, Bruno Souza deCarvalho, Daiane Barros2020-12-19T07:40:22Zoai:ojs.portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br:article/960Revistahttps://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zeroPUBhttps://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/oaircs@hcitajuba.org.br||rcsfmit@medicinaitajuba.com.br2236-37852236-3785opendoar:2020-12-19T07:40:22Revista Ciências em Saúde - Hospital de Clínicas de Itajubáfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
Testes funcionais validados em indivíduos hospitalizados e não hospitalizados: revisão sistemática
title Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
spellingShingle Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
Santos, Natasha Cordeiro dos
physical functional performance
validation studies
reproducibility of results
desempenho físico funcional
estudos de validação
reprodutibilidade dos testes
title_short Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
title_full Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
title_fullStr Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
title_sort Validated functional tests in hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals: systematic review
author Santos, Natasha Cordeiro dos
author_facet Santos, Natasha Cordeiro dos
Soares, Neila Silva
Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta dos
Matos, Bruno Souza de
Carvalho, Daiane Barros
author_role author
author2 Soares, Neila Silva
Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta dos
Matos, Bruno Souza de
Carvalho, Daiane Barros
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Natasha Cordeiro dos
Soares, Neila Silva
Anjos, Jorge Luis Motta dos
Matos, Bruno Souza de
Carvalho, Daiane Barros
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv physical functional performance
validation studies
reproducibility of results
desempenho físico funcional
estudos de validação
reprodutibilidade dos testes
topic physical functional performance
validation studies
reproducibility of results
desempenho físico funcional
estudos de validação
reprodutibilidade dos testes
description Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the functional tests validated in different profiles of hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and to evaluate the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity. Methods: This is a systematic review. The databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, Lilacs and SciELO were used with the descriptors Functional Tests (Walk Test, Gait Speed ​​Test, Chair Stand Test, Timed Up and Go, Step Test), Validation Studies as Topic and synonyms. Validation studies of functional tests were included in hospitalized or non-hospitalized individuals who used the criteria of validity and/or reliability and related the tests to different variables. These articles could be longitudinal or cross-sectional observational or validation studies that used data from clinical trials. Articles that did not present significant characteristics of the sample and the description of the test were excluded. Results: The search resulted in 36,150 articles, and 89 were included. The studies were organized in tables with information such as author, year, validation criteria, sample, test, associated variables and results. The quality of the articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Conclusion: Functional tests are valid and reliable for assessing hospitalized and non-hospitalized individuals and are associated with muscle strength, ability to walk, postural control, activities of daily living, risk of falls, hospitalization, and mortality.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed
Avaliado pelos pares
texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/960
10.21876/rcshci.v10i4.960
url https://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/960
identifier_str_mv 10.21876/rcshci.v10i4.960
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrcs.hcitajuba.org.br/index.php/rcsfmit_zero/article/view/960/611
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA CIÊNCIAS EM SAÚDE
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA CIÊNCIAS EM SAÚDE
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv AISI/HCI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv AISI/HCI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciências em Saúde; v. 10 n. 4 (2020): Outubro a Dezembro de 2020; 23-53
Health Sciences Journal; Vol 10 No 4 (2020): October to December 2020; 23-53
2236-3785
10.21876/rcshci.v10i4
reponame:Revista Ciências em Saúde
instname:Hospital de Clínicas de Itajubá
instacron:HCI
instname_str Hospital de Clínicas de Itajubá
instacron_str HCI
institution HCI
reponame_str Revista Ciências em Saúde
collection Revista Ciências em Saúde
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Ciências em Saúde - Hospital de Clínicas de Itajubá
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rcs@hcitajuba.org.br||rcsfmit@medicinaitajuba.com.br
_version_ 1797068962759966720