Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
Texto Completo: | https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13952 |
Resumo: | CONTEXT: The fundamental procedural principles are tools geared, in criminal proceedings, to ensuring a fair and effective trial throughout the persecutio criminis. Defense in depth is a constitutional principle applicable in criminal proceedings to safeguard the right of every citizen to have a quality and dignified judgment and, therefore, must be observed by jurisdictional bodies as a commitment to the rule of law. OBJECTIVE: The work intends to show that the legal assistance provided by ad hoc defenders in criminal cases, at least in the State of Roraima, Brazil, does not adequately honor the principle of defense in depth. METHOD: The present paper is the result of research carried out at the Court of Justice of the State of Roraima, Brazil, which used the descriptive method to present some illustrative cases, from a predominantly qualitative approach; bibliographic research techniques were also used to select texts and judicial documents (sentences) related to the issue and with a local focus. RELEVANCE / ORIGINALITY: The paper analyzes the quality of services offered by ad hoc defenders in specific cases. RESULTS: Through analysis of cases judged in the Court of Justice of the State of Roraima, Brazil, it was possible to reach the conclusion that the appointment of substitute or ad hoc defender by the judge, in some cases, makes the technical defense non-effective, thus violating the fundamental principles of defense in depth and due process. THEORETICAL / METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: Paper seeks to emphasize the importance of researches on free legal assistance, including ad hoc defense, in criminal cases, based on contextualized data. |
id |
RD-0_c89e968ef44c07e1954ab4d76f8eda98 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13952 |
network_acronym_str |
RD-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defenderA inefetividade do princípio fundamental da ampla defesa em casos de nomeação de defensor ad hocPrincípio da ampla defesa. Inefetividade. Defensor ad hoc. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Roraima.Principle of defense in depth. Non-effectiveness. Ad hoc Defender. Court of Justice of the State of Roraima.CONTEXT: The fundamental procedural principles are tools geared, in criminal proceedings, to ensuring a fair and effective trial throughout the persecutio criminis. Defense in depth is a constitutional principle applicable in criminal proceedings to safeguard the right of every citizen to have a quality and dignified judgment and, therefore, must be observed by jurisdictional bodies as a commitment to the rule of law. OBJECTIVE: The work intends to show that the legal assistance provided by ad hoc defenders in criminal cases, at least in the State of Roraima, Brazil, does not adequately honor the principle of defense in depth. METHOD: The present paper is the result of research carried out at the Court of Justice of the State of Roraima, Brazil, which used the descriptive method to present some illustrative cases, from a predominantly qualitative approach; bibliographic research techniques were also used to select texts and judicial documents (sentences) related to the issue and with a local focus. RELEVANCE / ORIGINALITY: The paper analyzes the quality of services offered by ad hoc defenders in specific cases. RESULTS: Through analysis of cases judged in the Court of Justice of the State of Roraima, Brazil, it was possible to reach the conclusion that the appointment of substitute or ad hoc defender by the judge, in some cases, makes the technical defense non-effective, thus violating the fundamental principles of defense in depth and due process. THEORETICAL / METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: Paper seeks to emphasize the importance of researches on free legal assistance, including ad hoc defense, in criminal cases, based on contextualized data.CONTEXTO: Os princípios processuais fundamentais são ferramentas voltadas, no processo penal, à garantia de um julgamento justo e efetivo durante toda a persecutio criminis. A ampla defesa é um princípio constitucional aplicável no processo penal para resguardar o direito de todo cidadão em ter um julgamento de qualidade e digno e, por isso mesmo, deve ser observada pelos órgãos jurisdicionais como um compromisso com o Estado democrático. OBJETIVO: O trabalho pretende mostrar que a assistência jurídica fornecida pelos defensores ad hoc nos processos criminais, ao menos no Estado de Roraima, não honram adequadamente o princípio da ampla defesa. MÉTODO: O presente trabalho é resultado de pesquisa realizada no Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Roraima, que utilizou o método descritivo para apresentar alguns casos ilustrativos, a partir de uma abordagem predominantemente qualitativa; foram utilizadas ainda técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica para a seleção de materiais bibliográficos e documentais (jurisprudência) relativos ao tema e com enfoque local. RELEVÂNCIA/ORIGINALIDADE: O trabalho analisa a qualidade dos serviços oferecidos por defensores ad hoc em casos específicos. RESULTADOS: Por meio de análise de casos julgados no TJ-RR, foi possível chegar à conclusão de que a nomeação de defensor substituto ou ad hoc pelo magistrado, em alguns casos, torna a defesa técnica inefetiva, violando-se assim o princípio fundamental da ampla defesa e do contraditório, como também do devido processo legal. CONTRIBUIÇÕES TEÓRICAS/METODOLÓGICAS: O trabalho busca enfatizar a importância de trabalhos sobre assistência jurídica gratuita, incluindo a defesa ad hoc em processos criminais, baseado em dados e informações contextualizados.Centro Universitário FG (UniFG)2021-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/1395210.29293/rdfg.v8i01.330Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 8 No. 01 (2021); e330Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 8 n. 01 (2021); e3302447-6536reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambiinstname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)instacron:RDporhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13952/7776https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13952/7777Copyright (c) 2021 Iranilde da Silva, Fernando César Costa Xavierhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Iranilde daXavier, Fernando César Costa2022-07-11T19:30:34Zoai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13952Revistahttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/RevistadedireitoONGhttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/Revistadedireito/oaimuriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br2447-65362447-6536opendoar:2022-07-11T19:30:34Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender A inefetividade do princípio fundamental da ampla defesa em casos de nomeação de defensor ad hoc |
title |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender |
spellingShingle |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender Silva, Iranilde da Princípio da ampla defesa. Inefetividade. Defensor ad hoc. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Roraima. Principle of defense in depth. Non-effectiveness. Ad hoc Defender. Court of Justice of the State of Roraima. |
title_short |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender |
title_full |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender |
title_fullStr |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender |
title_sort |
Non-effectiveness of the fundamental principle of defense in depth in cases of appointing ad hoc defender |
author |
Silva, Iranilde da |
author_facet |
Silva, Iranilde da Xavier, Fernando César Costa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Xavier, Fernando César Costa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Iranilde da Xavier, Fernando César Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Princípio da ampla defesa. Inefetividade. Defensor ad hoc. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Roraima. Principle of defense in depth. Non-effectiveness. Ad hoc Defender. Court of Justice of the State of Roraima. |
topic |
Princípio da ampla defesa. Inefetividade. Defensor ad hoc. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Roraima. Principle of defense in depth. Non-effectiveness. Ad hoc Defender. Court of Justice of the State of Roraima. |
description |
CONTEXT: The fundamental procedural principles are tools geared, in criminal proceedings, to ensuring a fair and effective trial throughout the persecutio criminis. Defense in depth is a constitutional principle applicable in criminal proceedings to safeguard the right of every citizen to have a quality and dignified judgment and, therefore, must be observed by jurisdictional bodies as a commitment to the rule of law. OBJECTIVE: The work intends to show that the legal assistance provided by ad hoc defenders in criminal cases, at least in the State of Roraima, Brazil, does not adequately honor the principle of defense in depth. METHOD: The present paper is the result of research carried out at the Court of Justice of the State of Roraima, Brazil, which used the descriptive method to present some illustrative cases, from a predominantly qualitative approach; bibliographic research techniques were also used to select texts and judicial documents (sentences) related to the issue and with a local focus. RELEVANCE / ORIGINALITY: The paper analyzes the quality of services offered by ad hoc defenders in specific cases. RESULTS: Through analysis of cases judged in the Court of Justice of the State of Roraima, Brazil, it was possible to reach the conclusion that the appointment of substitute or ad hoc defender by the judge, in some cases, makes the technical defense non-effective, thus violating the fundamental principles of defense in depth and due process. THEORETICAL / METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: Paper seeks to emphasize the importance of researches on free legal assistance, including ad hoc defense, in criminal cases, based on contextualized data. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13952 10.29293/rdfg.v8i01.330 |
url |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13952 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29293/rdfg.v8i01.330 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13952/7776 https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13952/7777 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Iranilde da Silva, Fernando César Costa Xavier https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Iranilde da Silva, Fernando César Costa Xavier https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 8 No. 01 (2021); e330 Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 8 n. 01 (2021); e330 2447-6536 reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi instname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) instacron:RD |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
instacron_str |
RD |
institution |
RD |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
collection |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
muriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797240130006679552 |