Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
Texto Completo: | https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922 |
Resumo: | The aim of the text is to show an articulation between the action research methodology developed by Michel Thiollent and the intersectionality method (s), which was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw. For this, the problem of modern sciences is articulated as neutral sciences and how action research overcomes the problems left by them enabling a qualitative leap and better suited to the applied social sciences. Then, we proceed to the conceptualization and articulation of the key concepts to finally demonstrate the articulation between action research and intersectionality (s) in practice by Federal Universities. The methodology used is the critical methodological. |
id |
RD-0_cecce15e7b67ec182d5230913fbae972 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13922 |
network_acronym_str |
RD-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal fieldPesquisa-ação como metodologia e interseccionalidade(s) como método-praxis: rupturas dentro dos paradigmas da ciência moderna que criam espaços de construções dialógicas dentro do campo jurídicoExtensão. Pesquisa-ação. Metodologia. Interseccionalidade.Extension. Research-action. Methodology. Intersectionality.The aim of the text is to show an articulation between the action research methodology developed by Michel Thiollent and the intersectionality method (s), which was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw. For this, the problem of modern sciences is articulated as neutral sciences and how action research overcomes the problems left by them enabling a qualitative leap and better suited to the applied social sciences. Then, we proceed to the conceptualization and articulation of the key concepts to finally demonstrate the articulation between action research and intersectionality (s) in practice by Federal Universities. The methodology used is the critical methodological.O objetivo do texto é mostrar uma articulação entre a metodologia da pesquisa-ação, desenvolvida por Michel Thiollent, e do método da interseccionalidade(s), que foi cunhado por Kimberlé Crenshaw. Para isso, articula-se a problemática das ciências modernas como ciências neutras e como a pesquisa-ação supera os problemas deixados por aquelas possibilitando um salto qualitativo e melhor adequado às ciências sociais aplicadas. Em seguida, passa-se à conceituação e articulação dos conceitos chaves para, por fim, demonstrar a articulação entre pesquisa-ação e interseccionalidade(s) na prática por Universidades Federais. A metodologia utilizada no crítico-metodológica.Centro Universitário FG (UniFG)2020-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/1392210.29293/rdfg.v6i02.269Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 6 No. 02 (2019); e269Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 6 n. 02 (2019); e2692447-6536reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambiinstname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)instacron:RDporhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922/7690https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922/7691https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922/7692Copyright (c) 2020 Rainer Bomfim, Alexandre Gustavo Melo Franco de Moraes Bahia, Marina Souza Lima Rochahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBomfim, RainerBahia, Alexandre Gustavo Melo Franco de MoraesRocha, Marina Souza Lima2022-07-11T19:54:42Zoai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13922Revistahttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/RevistadedireitoONGhttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/Revistadedireito/oaimuriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br2447-65362447-6536opendoar:2022-07-11T19:54:42Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field Pesquisa-ação como metodologia e interseccionalidade(s) como método-praxis: rupturas dentro dos paradigmas da ciência moderna que criam espaços de construções dialógicas dentro do campo jurídico |
title |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field |
spellingShingle |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field Bomfim, Rainer Extensão. Pesquisa-ação. Metodologia. Interseccionalidade. Extension. Research-action. Methodology. Intersectionality. |
title_short |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field |
title_full |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field |
title_fullStr |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field |
title_sort |
Research-Action as methodology and intersectionality (s) as method: ruptures within the paradigms of modern science that create spaces for dialogical constructions within the legal field |
author |
Bomfim, Rainer |
author_facet |
Bomfim, Rainer Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo Melo Franco de Moraes Rocha, Marina Souza Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo Melo Franco de Moraes Rocha, Marina Souza Lima |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bomfim, Rainer Bahia, Alexandre Gustavo Melo Franco de Moraes Rocha, Marina Souza Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Extensão. Pesquisa-ação. Metodologia. Interseccionalidade. Extension. Research-action. Methodology. Intersectionality. |
topic |
Extensão. Pesquisa-ação. Metodologia. Interseccionalidade. Extension. Research-action. Methodology. Intersectionality. |
description |
The aim of the text is to show an articulation between the action research methodology developed by Michel Thiollent and the intersectionality method (s), which was coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw. For this, the problem of modern sciences is articulated as neutral sciences and how action research overcomes the problems left by them enabling a qualitative leap and better suited to the applied social sciences. Then, we proceed to the conceptualization and articulation of the key concepts to finally demonstrate the articulation between action research and intersectionality (s) in practice by Federal Universities. The methodology used is the critical methodological. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922 10.29293/rdfg.v6i02.269 |
url |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29293/rdfg.v6i02.269 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922/7690 https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922/7691 https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13922/7692 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 6 No. 02 (2019); e269 Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 6 n. 02 (2019); e269 2447-6536 reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi instname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) instacron:RD |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
instacron_str |
RD |
institution |
RD |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
collection |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
muriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797240129888190464 |