The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
DOI: | 10.29293/rdfg.v7i02.318 |
Texto Completo: | https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this work was to analyze the institute of the stable union as a family entity recognized by the Federal Constitution of 1988, making its distinction with the concubinage and presenting its requirements, rights and duties and its patrimonial effects, in order to question whether or not monogamy would be necessary for the constitution of a stable union, that is, if this institute could be present in a single relationship composed of several people (polygamy) or not. As for the methodology, the bibliographic-documental method had been used, with the use of doctrines, judged by the Superior Courts, scientific articles and normative texts, as well as the deductive method, starting from a general analysis about the institute of the stable union to clarify whether or not monogamy is an indispensable requirement for the constitution of a stable union. Thus, the research carried out for the elaboration of this article came to the conclusion that monogamy - principle by which marriage and stable union could only be constituted by a relationship composed of, at most, two persons - is indispensable for the formation of the stable union bond, so that it is equivalent to a family entity, it is compared to marriage, as the CF/1988 itself establishes, nothing preventing, however, that polygamous relationships are constituted on the phatic level. |
id |
RD-0_de23359af37e68648a3c18df6721250a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13940 |
network_acronym_str |
RD-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
spelling |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterizationA União Estável no Direito brasileiro e a monogamia como elemento (im)prescindível para a sua caracterizaçãoPoliamorismo. Impossibilidade. Código Civil. Constituição Federal.Polyamory. Impossibility. Civil Code. Federal Constitution.The purpose of this work was to analyze the institute of the stable union as a family entity recognized by the Federal Constitution of 1988, making its distinction with the concubinage and presenting its requirements, rights and duties and its patrimonial effects, in order to question whether or not monogamy would be necessary for the constitution of a stable union, that is, if this institute could be present in a single relationship composed of several people (polygamy) or not. As for the methodology, the bibliographic-documental method had been used, with the use of doctrines, judged by the Superior Courts, scientific articles and normative texts, as well as the deductive method, starting from a general analysis about the institute of the stable union to clarify whether or not monogamy is an indispensable requirement for the constitution of a stable union. Thus, the research carried out for the elaboration of this article came to the conclusion that monogamy - principle by which marriage and stable union could only be constituted by a relationship composed of, at most, two persons - is indispensable for the formation of the stable union bond, so that it is equivalent to a family entity, it is compared to marriage, as the CF/1988 itself establishes, nothing preventing, however, that polygamous relationships are constituted on the phatic level.O presente trabalho teve por objetivo analisar o instituto da união estável como entidade familiar reconhecida pela Constituição Federal de 1988, realizando a sua distinção com o concubinato e apresentando seus requisitos, direitos e deveres que lhe são inerentes e seus efeitos patrimoniais, de modo a se questionar se a monogamia seria ou não necessária à constituição de uma união estável, ou seja, se esse instituto poderia estar presente numa só relação composta por várias pessoas (poligamia) ou não. Quanto à metodologia, fora utilizado o método bibliográfico-documental, com a utilização de doutrinas, julgados dos Tribunais Superiores, artigos científicos e textos normativos, bem como o método dedutivo, partindo-se de uma análise geral acerca do instituto da união estável para esclarecer se a monogamia é requisito imprescindível ou não à constituição de uma união estável. Dessa forma, a pesquisa realizada para a elaboração deste artigo chegou à conclusão de que a monogamia – princípio pelo qual o casamento e a união estável somente poderiam ser constituídos por uma relação composta por, no máximo, duas pessoas – é imprescindível para a formação do vínculo da união estável, eis que esta equipara-se a uma entidade familiar, ombreia-se ao casamento, como a própria CF/1988 estabelece, nada impedindo, contudo, que as relações poligâmicas sejam constituídas no plano fático.Centro Universitário FG (UniFG)2021-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/1394010.29293/rdfg.v7i02.318Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 7 No. 02 (2020); e318Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 7 n. 02 (2020); e3182447-6536reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambiinstname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)instacron:RDporhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940/7744https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940/7745https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940/7746Copyright (c) 2021 Ozório Nonato de Abrantes Neto, Maria dos Remédios de Lima Barbosahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonatode Lima Barbosa, Maria dos Remédios2022-07-11T19:37:55Zoai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13940Revistahttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/RevistadedireitoONGhttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/Revistadedireito/oaimuriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br2447-65362447-6536opendoar:2022-07-11T19:37:55Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization A União Estável no Direito brasileiro e a monogamia como elemento (im)prescindível para a sua caracterização |
title |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization |
spellingShingle |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization de Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato Poliamorismo. Impossibilidade. Código Civil. Constituição Federal. Polyamory. Impossibility. Civil Code. Federal Constitution. de Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato Poliamorismo. Impossibilidade. Código Civil. Constituição Federal. Polyamory. Impossibility. Civil Code. Federal Constitution. |
title_short |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization |
title_full |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization |
title_fullStr |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization |
title_full_unstemmed |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization |
title_sort |
The stable union in Brazilian law and monogamy as a (in)dispensable element for its characterization |
author |
de Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato |
author_facet |
de Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de Lima Barbosa, Maria dos Remédios de Lima Barbosa, Maria dos Remédios |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Lima Barbosa, Maria dos Remédios |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Abrantes Neto, Ozório Nonato de Lima Barbosa, Maria dos Remédios |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Poliamorismo. Impossibilidade. Código Civil. Constituição Federal. Polyamory. Impossibility. Civil Code. Federal Constitution. |
topic |
Poliamorismo. Impossibilidade. Código Civil. Constituição Federal. Polyamory. Impossibility. Civil Code. Federal Constitution. |
description |
The purpose of this work was to analyze the institute of the stable union as a family entity recognized by the Federal Constitution of 1988, making its distinction with the concubinage and presenting its requirements, rights and duties and its patrimonial effects, in order to question whether or not monogamy would be necessary for the constitution of a stable union, that is, if this institute could be present in a single relationship composed of several people (polygamy) or not. As for the methodology, the bibliographic-documental method had been used, with the use of doctrines, judged by the Superior Courts, scientific articles and normative texts, as well as the deductive method, starting from a general analysis about the institute of the stable union to clarify whether or not monogamy is an indispensable requirement for the constitution of a stable union. Thus, the research carried out for the elaboration of this article came to the conclusion that monogamy - principle by which marriage and stable union could only be constituted by a relationship composed of, at most, two persons - is indispensable for the formation of the stable union bond, so that it is equivalent to a family entity, it is compared to marriage, as the CF/1988 itself establishes, nothing preventing, however, that polygamous relationships are constituted on the phatic level. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940 10.29293/rdfg.v7i02.318 |
url |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29293/rdfg.v7i02.318 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940/7744 https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940/7745 https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13940/7746 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Ozório Nonato de Abrantes Neto, Maria dos Remédios de Lima Barbosa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Ozório Nonato de Abrantes Neto, Maria dos Remédios de Lima Barbosa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 7 No. 02 (2020); e318 Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 7 n. 02 (2020); e318 2447-6536 reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi instname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) instacron:RD |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
instacron_str |
RD |
institution |
RD |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
collection |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
muriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br |
_version_ |
1822179659878498304 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.29293/rdfg.v7i02.318 |