«To change the world»: justice or utopia?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Douglas Price, Jorge Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
por
Título da fonte: Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314
Resumo: The essay plays, in an  ironic way, similarly to Jorge Luis Borges’ style, with the idea that the expression to change the world: justice or utopia, which is not found in Quixote, could undoubtedly have been excluded of it, or invented by an anonymous author, a habitual resource in the Middle Ages. It points out that we are in the presence of works that somehow mark the beginning of the concept of “author” and, paradoxically, question it, as Cervantes does deliberately, or as portrayed in the difficulties to establish the verisimilitude of the authorship of the works by the English bard. And this is done  in order to work not only with the coincidence of the dates of their deaths (which grants space for another Borges-like game), but also with their contribution to the formation of the Western cultural universe, which made Bloom exaggerate in the attribution to Shakespeare of “inventing the human”, but to formulate the opposition of two ethics between two emblematic characters, such as Quixote and Lady Macbeth: ethics, which we shall call “of duty”, from which the concept of utopia is built, present in Erasmus Of Rotterdam’s work (of great influence in the Spain of Cervantes) and of Thomas Morus; And the ethics that we will call pragmatic, the ethics of Lady Macbeth, who prescribes to her husband the advice of Nicholas Machiavelli. In short, this paper concludes that Cervantes and Shakespeare inaugurated modernity, and the ideas found in their works, which were present in the production of sense of their time, in turn altered it (given the performative effect of literature); And that their remarkable personalities, united by the invisible thread of “madness”, allowed us to see the two faces of the human, as the Sileni of Alcibiades.
id RDL_59cc18960a87cb56608cb644f539fb8e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/314
network_acronym_str RDL
network_name_str Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling «To change the world»: justice or utopia?«Cambiar el mundo»:¿justicia o utopía?«Mudar o mundo»: justiça ou utopia?modernityethicsErasmusMachiavelliutopiaperformativitymodernidadéticaErasmoMaquiaveloutopíaperformatividadmodernidadeéticaErasmoMaquiavelutopiaperformatividadeThe essay plays, in an  ironic way, similarly to Jorge Luis Borges’ style, with the idea that the expression to change the world: justice or utopia, which is not found in Quixote, could undoubtedly have been excluded of it, or invented by an anonymous author, a habitual resource in the Middle Ages. It points out that we are in the presence of works that somehow mark the beginning of the concept of “author” and, paradoxically, question it, as Cervantes does deliberately, or as portrayed in the difficulties to establish the verisimilitude of the authorship of the works by the English bard. And this is done  in order to work not only with the coincidence of the dates of their deaths (which grants space for another Borges-like game), but also with their contribution to the formation of the Western cultural universe, which made Bloom exaggerate in the attribution to Shakespeare of “inventing the human”, but to formulate the opposition of two ethics between two emblematic characters, such as Quixote and Lady Macbeth: ethics, which we shall call “of duty”, from which the concept of utopia is built, present in Erasmus Of Rotterdam’s work (of great influence in the Spain of Cervantes) and of Thomas Morus; And the ethics that we will call pragmatic, the ethics of Lady Macbeth, who prescribes to her husband the advice of Nicholas Machiavelli. In short, this paper concludes that Cervantes and Shakespeare inaugurated modernity, and the ideas found in their works, which were present in the production of sense of their time, in turn altered it (given the performative effect of literature); And that their remarkable personalities, united by the invisible thread of “madness”, allowed us to see the two faces of the human, as the Sileni of Alcibiades.El ensayo juega irónica y borgeanamente, con la idea de que la expresión «Cambiar el mundo»: ¿justicia o utopía?, que no se encuentra en El Quijote, pudiera sin embargo haber sido excluida de él, o bien inventada por un autor anónimo, recurso habitual en la edad media. Señala que estamos en presencia de obras que, en algún modo, marcan el comienzo del concepto de “autor” y, paradójicamente, lo cuestionan, como lo hace Cervantes de modo deliberado, o como queda retratado en las dificultades para establecer la verosimilitud de la autoría de las obras del bardo inglés. Y esto lo hace para trabajar, no sólo por la coincidencia de las fechas de sus muertes (que otorga espacio para otro juego borgeano), sino por su contribución a la conformación del universo cultural occidental, que llevara a Bloom a la exageración de atribuir a Shakespeare “la invención de lo humano”, sino para formular la oposición de dos éticas entre dos personajes emblemáticos como el propio Quijote y Lady Macbeth: la ética, que luego llamaríamos “del deber”, desde la que se construye el concepto de utopía, presente en la obra de Erasmo de Rotterdam (de enorme influencia en la España de Cervantes) y en la de Tomás Moro; y la ética, que luego llamaremos pragmática, la ética de Lady Macbeth, que prescribe a su esposo los consejos de Nicolás Maquiavelo. En suma, sostiene que Cervantes y Shakespeare inauguran la modernidad, que las ideas que encontramos en sus obras, que estaban presentes en la producción de sentido de su tiempo, a su vez, lo alteraron (dado el efecto performativo de la literatura); y que, sus entrañables personajes, unidos por el hilo invisible de la “locura”, permiten ver las dos caras de lo humano, como en los silenos de Alcibíades.O ensaio joga, irônica e borgianamente, com a ideia de que a expressão mudar o mundo: justiça ou utopia, que não se encontra no Quixote, poderia sem dúvida ter sido dele excluída, ou inventada por um autor anônimo, recurso habitual na Idade Média. Assinala que estamos em presença de obras que, de algum modo, marcam o começo do conceito de “autor” e, paradoxalmente, o questionam, como o faz Cervantes de modo deliberado, ou como fica retratado nas dificuldades para estabelecer a verosimilhança da autoria das obras do bardo inglês. E isso o faz para trabalhar não só pela coincidência das datas de suas mortes (que outorga espaço para outro jogo borgiano), mas também por sua contribuição à conformação do universo cultural ocidental, que leva Bloom ao exagero de atribuir a Shakespeare “a invenção do humano”, senão para formular a oposição de duas éticas entre duas personagens emblemáticas, como o próprio Quixote e Lady Macbeth: a ética, que logo chamaremos “de dever”, desde a qual se constrói o conceito de utopia, presente na obra de Erasmo de Roterdã (de enorma influência na Espanha de Cervantes) e na de Thomas Morus; e a ética que logo chamaremos pragmática, a ética de Lady Macbeth, que prescreve a seu marido os conselhos de Nicolau Maquiavel. Em suma, sustenta que Cervantes e Shakespeare inauguram a modernidade, que as ideias que encontramos em suas obras, as quais estavam presentes na produção de sentido de seu tempo, por sua vez o alteraram (dado o efeito performativo da literatura); e que suas entranháveis personagens, unidas pelo invisível fio da “loucura”, permitem ver as duas faces do humano, como nos silenos de Alcibíades.Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)2017-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/31410.21119/anamps.31.119-152ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 3 No 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 3 N. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 3 n. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-1522446-80882446-808810.21119/anamps.31.2017reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)instacron:RDLspaporhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314/pdf_1https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314/xmlCopyright (c) 2017 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literaturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDouglas Price, Jorge Eduardo2020-05-12T14:47:05Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/314Revistahttp://rdl.org.br/seer/index.php/anampsONGhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/oairevista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br2446-80882446-8088opendoar:2020-05-12T14:47:05Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
«Cambiar el mundo»:¿justicia o utopía?
«Mudar o mundo»: justiça ou utopia?
title «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
spellingShingle «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
Douglas Price, Jorge Eduardo
modernity
ethics
Erasmus
Machiavelli
utopia
performativity
modernidad
ética
Erasmo
Maquiavelo
utopía
performatividad
modernidade
ética
Erasmo
Maquiavel
utopia
performatividade
title_short «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
title_full «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
title_fullStr «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
title_full_unstemmed «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
title_sort «To change the world»: justice or utopia?
author Douglas Price, Jorge Eduardo
author_facet Douglas Price, Jorge Eduardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Douglas Price, Jorge Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv modernity
ethics
Erasmus
Machiavelli
utopia
performativity
modernidad
ética
Erasmo
Maquiavelo
utopía
performatividad
modernidade
ética
Erasmo
Maquiavel
utopia
performatividade
topic modernity
ethics
Erasmus
Machiavelli
utopia
performativity
modernidad
ética
Erasmo
Maquiavelo
utopía
performatividad
modernidade
ética
Erasmo
Maquiavel
utopia
performatividade
description The essay plays, in an  ironic way, similarly to Jorge Luis Borges’ style, with the idea that the expression to change the world: justice or utopia, which is not found in Quixote, could undoubtedly have been excluded of it, or invented by an anonymous author, a habitual resource in the Middle Ages. It points out that we are in the presence of works that somehow mark the beginning of the concept of “author” and, paradoxically, question it, as Cervantes does deliberately, or as portrayed in the difficulties to establish the verisimilitude of the authorship of the works by the English bard. And this is done  in order to work not only with the coincidence of the dates of their deaths (which grants space for another Borges-like game), but also with their contribution to the formation of the Western cultural universe, which made Bloom exaggerate in the attribution to Shakespeare of “inventing the human”, but to formulate the opposition of two ethics between two emblematic characters, such as Quixote and Lady Macbeth: ethics, which we shall call “of duty”, from which the concept of utopia is built, present in Erasmus Of Rotterdam’s work (of great influence in the Spain of Cervantes) and of Thomas Morus; And the ethics that we will call pragmatic, the ethics of Lady Macbeth, who prescribes to her husband the advice of Nicholas Machiavelli. In short, this paper concludes that Cervantes and Shakespeare inaugurated modernity, and the ideas found in their works, which were present in the production of sense of their time, in turn altered it (given the performative effect of literature); And that their remarkable personalities, united by the invisible thread of “madness”, allowed us to see the two faces of the human, as the Sileni of Alcibiades.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314
10.21119/anamps.31.119-152
url https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314
identifier_str_mv 10.21119/anamps.31.119-152
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
por
language spa
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314/pdf
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314/pdf_1
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/314/xml
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152
ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152
ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 3 No 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152
ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 3 N. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152
ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 3 n. 1 (2017): janeiro-junho; 119-152
2446-8088
2446-8088
10.21119/anamps.31.2017
reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
instacron:RDL
instname_str Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
instacron_str RDL
institution RDL
reponame_str Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
collection Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br
_version_ 1809209865786097664