Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/686 |
Resumo: | This article explores Uruguayan’s perceptions about privacy rights in the digital era and the capacity of legal and institutional frameworks to protect it. The article presents the results of a survey and an intervention (experimental design) on the Facebook platform in Uruguay from 2018, where participants received a random treatment about their credit information that was publicly available with their National Identification Number. Based on these results, the article explores the tensions in matters of identity systems, personal data protection and regulation of the privacy right in Uruguay. The Uruguayan case is relevant for its adaptation to the personal data protection standards proposed by the European Union, as well as for the relatively good institutional performance of the country in Latin America. Based on the results of the survey and the experiment, the privacy paradox is confirmed, according to which people recognize an important value in the law but their actions for protection are limited. The article argues in favor of building state and citizen capacities for effective control of personal data. |
id |
RPED-1_15f9d6c37ef13a290adf2efcde73931a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/686 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in UruguayPercepciones sobre privacidad y uso de herramientas para su protección en uruguayprivacidadprotección de datos personalespercepcionesvigilanciaprivacidadeprotección de datos personalespercepcionesvigilanciaThis article explores Uruguayan’s perceptions about privacy rights in the digital era and the capacity of legal and institutional frameworks to protect it. The article presents the results of a survey and an intervention (experimental design) on the Facebook platform in Uruguay from 2018, where participants received a random treatment about their credit information that was publicly available with their National Identification Number. Based on these results, the article explores the tensions in matters of identity systems, personal data protection and regulation of the privacy right in Uruguay. The Uruguayan case is relevant for its adaptation to the personal data protection standards proposed by the European Union, as well as for the relatively good institutional performance of the country in Latin America. Based on the results of the survey and the experiment, the privacy paradox is confirmed, according to which people recognize an important value in the law but their actions for protection are limited. The article argues in favor of building state and citizen capacities for effective control of personal data. Este artículo explora las percepciones de los uruguayos sobre el derecho a la privacidad en la era digital y la capacidad de los marcos jurídicos e institucionales de protegerla. El artículo presenta los resultados de una encuesta y una intervención (diseño experimental) sobre la plataforma Facebook en Uruguay en 2018, donde las personas participantes recibieron un tratamiento aleatorio acerca de qué tipo de información crediticia se encontraba disponible públicamente en base a su Cédula de Identidad. En base a estos resultados el artículo explora las tensiones en materia de sistemas de identidad, protección de datos personales y regulación de este derecho en Uruguay. El caso uruguayo es relevante por su adecuación a los estándares de protección de datos personales propuestos por la Unión Europea, así como por el relativo buen desempeño institucional del país en América Latina. A partir de los resultados de la encuesta y el experimento se confirma la paradoja de la privacidad según la cual las personas reconocen un valor importante en el derecho, pero sus acciones para la protección es limitada. El artículo argumenta a favor de la construcción de capacidades estatales y ciudadanas para un efectivo control de los datos personales.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2023-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/68610.19092/reed.v10.686Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Digital rights on the move; 1-31Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Dossiê Direitos digitais em movimento; 1-312319-081710.19092/reed.v10reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/686/428Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEtcheverry, LorenaJackson, MatíasScrollini, FabrizioTuduri, Ana Karen2023-06-12T23:19:08Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/686Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2023-06-12T23:19:08Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay Percepciones sobre privacidad y uso de herramientas para su protección en uruguay |
title |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay |
spellingShingle |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay Etcheverry, Lorena privacidad protección de datos personales percepciones vigilancia privacidade protección de datos personales percepciones vigilancia |
title_short |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay |
title_full |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay |
title_fullStr |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay |
title_full_unstemmed |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay |
title_sort |
Privacy perceptions and the use of tools for its protection in Uruguay |
author |
Etcheverry, Lorena |
author_facet |
Etcheverry, Lorena Jackson, Matías Scrollini, Fabrizio Tuduri, Ana Karen |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jackson, Matías Scrollini, Fabrizio Tuduri, Ana Karen |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Etcheverry, Lorena Jackson, Matías Scrollini, Fabrizio Tuduri, Ana Karen |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
privacidad protección de datos personales percepciones vigilancia privacidade protección de datos personales percepciones vigilancia |
topic |
privacidad protección de datos personales percepciones vigilancia privacidade protección de datos personales percepciones vigilancia |
description |
This article explores Uruguayan’s perceptions about privacy rights in the digital era and the capacity of legal and institutional frameworks to protect it. The article presents the results of a survey and an intervention (experimental design) on the Facebook platform in Uruguay from 2018, where participants received a random treatment about their credit information that was publicly available with their National Identification Number. Based on these results, the article explores the tensions in matters of identity systems, personal data protection and regulation of the privacy right in Uruguay. The Uruguayan case is relevant for its adaptation to the personal data protection standards proposed by the European Union, as well as for the relatively good institutional performance of the country in Latin America. Based on the results of the survey and the experiment, the privacy paradox is confirmed, according to which people recognize an important value in the law but their actions for protection are limited. The article argues in favor of building state and citizen capacities for effective control of personal data. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/686 10.19092/reed.v10.686 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/686 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v10.686 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/686/428 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Digital rights on the move; 1-31 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Dossiê Direitos digitais em movimento; 1-31 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v10 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138702512881664 |