Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro Garcia, Renata
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Trindade Silva Borges, Jeferson, de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791
Resumo: After the enactment of the Law n. 13.257 (2016), known as Legal Landmark of Early Childhood, the possibility of converting preventive detention into house arrest for pregnant women or with children up to 12 years old was conceived. In this sense, this study aimed to analyze, in the light of black feminist criminology, how the Judiciary of Paraíba has pronounced itself about the granting of the house arrest for these women. For that, the adopted methodology was the documental research, with a qualitative approach, analyzing the Court of Justice of Paraíba Criminal Chamber’s decisions in habeas corpus between 2018 and 2019. Thereby, 57 decisions denying the conversion of detention to house arrest were examined, the concern lying on the legal discourse around the women who would have committed the crime. It was found that the reasoning used is often based on a moral discourse about women. Still, it can be seen that the house arrest is necessary and important as an extrication policy and also as a preservation of maternal bond, although it is yet another form of deprivation of liberty. Therefore, it is understood that one should have as an end in view a society in which no woman needs to be incarcerated.
id RPED-1_74fc230b6977ec98830cbd69077a5973
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/791
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrestMulher, perigosa e mãe: uma análise dos discursos jurídicos denegatórios à concessão de prisão domiciliarCriminologypreventive detentionmaternityLegal Landmark of Early ChildhoodCriminologiaPrisão PreventivaMaternidadeMarco Legal da Primeira InfânciaAfter the enactment of the Law n. 13.257 (2016), known as Legal Landmark of Early Childhood, the possibility of converting preventive detention into house arrest for pregnant women or with children up to 12 years old was conceived. In this sense, this study aimed to analyze, in the light of black feminist criminology, how the Judiciary of Paraíba has pronounced itself about the granting of the house arrest for these women. For that, the adopted methodology was the documental research, with a qualitative approach, analyzing the Court of Justice of Paraíba Criminal Chamber’s decisions in habeas corpus between 2018 and 2019. Thereby, 57 decisions denying the conversion of detention to house arrest were examined, the concern lying on the legal discourse around the women who would have committed the crime. It was found that the reasoning used is often based on a moral discourse about women. Still, it can be seen that the house arrest is necessary and important as an extrication policy and also as a preservation of maternal bond, although it is yet another form of deprivation of liberty. Therefore, it is understood that one should have as an end in view a society in which no woman needs to be incarcerated.Após a promulgação da Lei 13.257 (2016), cunhada como Marco Legal da Primeira Infância, concebeu-se a possibilidade de conversão da prisão preventiva em prisão domiciliar para mulheres grávidas ou com filhos de até 12 anos incompletos. Destarte, este artigo teve como objetivo analisar, à luz da Criminologia negra e feminista, de que maneira o Judiciário paraibano tem se pronunciado a respeito da concessão da medida cautelar domiciliar para estas mulheres. Para tanto, a metodologia adotada foi a pesquisa documental, de abordagem qualitativa, sendo analisadas as decisões em sede de habeas corpus da Câmara Criminal do Tribunal de Justiça da Paraíba entre 2018 e 2019. Foram examinados 57 julgados que negaram o pedido de conversão da preventiva em domiciliar, sendo analisado o discurso jurídico em torno da mulher que teria cometido o delito. Constatou-se que a fundamentação utilizada se assenta, com frequência, em um discurso moral sobre a mulher. Ainda, vislumbra-se que a medida cautelar domiciliar é necessária e importante como política desencarceradora e para a manutenção dos vínculos maternos, mas que se trata de mais uma medida privativa de liberdade. Portanto, entende-se que se deve ter como horizonte uma sociedade em que nenhuma mulher precise estar encarcerada.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2023-06-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/79110.19092/reed.v10.791Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-30Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-302319-081710.19092/reed.v10reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791/446Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonteiro Garcia, RenataTrindade Silva Borges, Jeferson de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina 2024-03-10T15:52:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/791Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2024-03-10T15:52:48Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
Mulher, perigosa e mãe: uma análise dos discursos jurídicos denegatórios à concessão de prisão domiciliar
title Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
spellingShingle Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
Monteiro Garcia, Renata
Criminology
preventive detention
maternity
Legal Landmark of Early Childhood
Criminologia
Prisão Preventiva
Maternidade
Marco Legal da Primeira Infância
title_short Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
title_full Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
title_fullStr Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
title_full_unstemmed Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
title_sort Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
author Monteiro Garcia, Renata
author_facet Monteiro Garcia, Renata
Trindade Silva Borges, Jeferson
de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina
author_role author
author2 Trindade Silva Borges, Jeferson
de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro Garcia, Renata
Trindade Silva Borges, Jeferson
de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Criminology
preventive detention
maternity
Legal Landmark of Early Childhood
Criminologia
Prisão Preventiva
Maternidade
Marco Legal da Primeira Infância
topic Criminology
preventive detention
maternity
Legal Landmark of Early Childhood
Criminologia
Prisão Preventiva
Maternidade
Marco Legal da Primeira Infância
description After the enactment of the Law n. 13.257 (2016), known as Legal Landmark of Early Childhood, the possibility of converting preventive detention into house arrest for pregnant women or with children up to 12 years old was conceived. In this sense, this study aimed to analyze, in the light of black feminist criminology, how the Judiciary of Paraíba has pronounced itself about the granting of the house arrest for these women. For that, the adopted methodology was the documental research, with a qualitative approach, analyzing the Court of Justice of Paraíba Criminal Chamber’s decisions in habeas corpus between 2018 and 2019. Thereby, 57 decisions denying the conversion of detention to house arrest were examined, the concern lying on the legal discourse around the women who would have committed the crime. It was found that the reasoning used is often based on a moral discourse about women. Still, it can be seen that the house arrest is necessary and important as an extrication policy and also as a preservation of maternal bond, although it is yet another form of deprivation of liberty. Therefore, it is understood that one should have as an end in view a society in which no woman needs to be incarcerated.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791
10.19092/reed.v10.791
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v10.791
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791/446
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-30
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-30
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v10
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138702590476288