Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791 |
Resumo: | After the enactment of the Law n. 13.257 (2016), known as Legal Landmark of Early Childhood, the possibility of converting preventive detention into house arrest for pregnant women or with children up to 12 years old was conceived. In this sense, this study aimed to analyze, in the light of black feminist criminology, how the Judiciary of Paraíba has pronounced itself about the granting of the house arrest for these women. For that, the adopted methodology was the documental research, with a qualitative approach, analyzing the Court of Justice of Paraíba Criminal Chamber’s decisions in habeas corpus between 2018 and 2019. Thereby, 57 decisions denying the conversion of detention to house arrest were examined, the concern lying on the legal discourse around the women who would have committed the crime. It was found that the reasoning used is often based on a moral discourse about women. Still, it can be seen that the house arrest is necessary and important as an extrication policy and also as a preservation of maternal bond, although it is yet another form of deprivation of liberty. Therefore, it is understood that one should have as an end in view a society in which no woman needs to be incarcerated. |
id |
RPED-1_74fc230b6977ec98830cbd69077a5973 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/791 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrestMulher, perigosa e mãe: uma análise dos discursos jurídicos denegatórios à concessão de prisão domiciliarCriminologypreventive detentionmaternityLegal Landmark of Early ChildhoodCriminologiaPrisão PreventivaMaternidadeMarco Legal da Primeira InfânciaAfter the enactment of the Law n. 13.257 (2016), known as Legal Landmark of Early Childhood, the possibility of converting preventive detention into house arrest for pregnant women or with children up to 12 years old was conceived. In this sense, this study aimed to analyze, in the light of black feminist criminology, how the Judiciary of Paraíba has pronounced itself about the granting of the house arrest for these women. For that, the adopted methodology was the documental research, with a qualitative approach, analyzing the Court of Justice of Paraíba Criminal Chamber’s decisions in habeas corpus between 2018 and 2019. Thereby, 57 decisions denying the conversion of detention to house arrest were examined, the concern lying on the legal discourse around the women who would have committed the crime. It was found that the reasoning used is often based on a moral discourse about women. Still, it can be seen that the house arrest is necessary and important as an extrication policy and also as a preservation of maternal bond, although it is yet another form of deprivation of liberty. Therefore, it is understood that one should have as an end in view a society in which no woman needs to be incarcerated.Após a promulgação da Lei 13.257 (2016), cunhada como Marco Legal da Primeira Infância, concebeu-se a possibilidade de conversão da prisão preventiva em prisão domiciliar para mulheres grávidas ou com filhos de até 12 anos incompletos. Destarte, este artigo teve como objetivo analisar, à luz da Criminologia negra e feminista, de que maneira o Judiciário paraibano tem se pronunciado a respeito da concessão da medida cautelar domiciliar para estas mulheres. Para tanto, a metodologia adotada foi a pesquisa documental, de abordagem qualitativa, sendo analisadas as decisões em sede de habeas corpus da Câmara Criminal do Tribunal de Justiça da Paraíba entre 2018 e 2019. Foram examinados 57 julgados que negaram o pedido de conversão da preventiva em domiciliar, sendo analisado o discurso jurídico em torno da mulher que teria cometido o delito. Constatou-se que a fundamentação utilizada se assenta, com frequência, em um discurso moral sobre a mulher. Ainda, vislumbra-se que a medida cautelar domiciliar é necessária e importante como política desencarceradora e para a manutenção dos vínculos maternos, mas que se trata de mais uma medida privativa de liberdade. Portanto, entende-se que se deve ter como horizonte uma sociedade em que nenhuma mulher precise estar encarcerada.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2023-06-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/79110.19092/reed.v10.791Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-30Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-302319-081710.19092/reed.v10reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791/446Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonteiro Garcia, RenataTrindade Silva Borges, Jeferson de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina 2024-03-10T15:52:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/791Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2024-03-10T15:52:48Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest Mulher, perigosa e mãe: uma análise dos discursos jurídicos denegatórios à concessão de prisão domiciliar |
title |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest |
spellingShingle |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest Monteiro Garcia, Renata Criminology preventive detention maternity Legal Landmark of Early Childhood Criminologia Prisão Preventiva Maternidade Marco Legal da Primeira Infância |
title_short |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest |
title_full |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest |
title_fullStr |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest |
title_full_unstemmed |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest |
title_sort |
Woman, dangerous and mother: an analysis of the legal discourses that deny the granting of house arrest |
author |
Monteiro Garcia, Renata |
author_facet |
Monteiro Garcia, Renata Trindade Silva Borges, Jeferson de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Trindade Silva Borges, Jeferson de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro Garcia, Renata Trindade Silva Borges, Jeferson de Araujo Rocha, Ana Carolina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Criminology preventive detention maternity Legal Landmark of Early Childhood Criminologia Prisão Preventiva Maternidade Marco Legal da Primeira Infância |
topic |
Criminology preventive detention maternity Legal Landmark of Early Childhood Criminologia Prisão Preventiva Maternidade Marco Legal da Primeira Infância |
description |
After the enactment of the Law n. 13.257 (2016), known as Legal Landmark of Early Childhood, the possibility of converting preventive detention into house arrest for pregnant women or with children up to 12 years old was conceived. In this sense, this study aimed to analyze, in the light of black feminist criminology, how the Judiciary of Paraíba has pronounced itself about the granting of the house arrest for these women. For that, the adopted methodology was the documental research, with a qualitative approach, analyzing the Court of Justice of Paraíba Criminal Chamber’s decisions in habeas corpus between 2018 and 2019. Thereby, 57 decisions denying the conversion of detention to house arrest were examined, the concern lying on the legal discourse around the women who would have committed the crime. It was found that the reasoning used is often based on a moral discourse about women. Still, it can be seen that the house arrest is necessary and important as an extrication policy and also as a preservation of maternal bond, although it is yet another form of deprivation of liberty. Therefore, it is understood that one should have as an end in view a society in which no woman needs to be incarcerated. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791 10.19092/reed.v10.791 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v10.791 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/791/446 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-30 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-30 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v10 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138702590476288 |