ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/553 |
Resumo: | This paper is the result of an empirical research that aimed to identify, through an ethnographic study on documents, applied on 914 provisional detention judicial acts pronounced during “custody hearings” that took place in Teresina from August/2017 to July/2018, the reasons to these detentions and the judges’ perception about criminalizing process and their role in the punishing wheel. The results showed us significant prevalence of the legal basis “para garantia da ordem pública” (82.38% - by itself; 13.89% - along with another legal basis; 96.28%, all together summed up); besides, the results showed us some detention acts were pronounced with no legal basis at all. We were taken to the conclusion that, apart from some really specific and countable cases, not only no detention act had a really cautious/provisional legal basis, in an intro-procedure perspective, but also they consisted in anticipated punishment, which suits well to what is yearned by some part of the population led by mass media, cutting through human rights and guarantees, though. It has become, someway, evident that judges cannot see criminalizing processes as the result of the repression state agencies selective actions; on top of that, however, they see themselves as some kind of safety agent on the punishing power’s command. |
id |
RPED-1_889bc46f86830ddda076620f8ffc7ae7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/553 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSESDesvelando discursos aprisionadores a partir de uma etnografia de decisões judiciaisethnography on documents;judicial decision acts;provisional detentionsetnografia de documentos;decisões judiciais;prisões preventivas.This paper is the result of an empirical research that aimed to identify, through an ethnographic study on documents, applied on 914 provisional detention judicial acts pronounced during “custody hearings” that took place in Teresina from August/2017 to July/2018, the reasons to these detentions and the judges’ perception about criminalizing process and their role in the punishing wheel. The results showed us significant prevalence of the legal basis “para garantia da ordem pública” (82.38% - by itself; 13.89% - along with another legal basis; 96.28%, all together summed up); besides, the results showed us some detention acts were pronounced with no legal basis at all. We were taken to the conclusion that, apart from some really specific and countable cases, not only no detention act had a really cautious/provisional legal basis, in an intro-procedure perspective, but also they consisted in anticipated punishment, which suits well to what is yearned by some part of the population led by mass media, cutting through human rights and guarantees, though. It has become, someway, evident that judges cannot see criminalizing processes as the result of the repression state agencies selective actions; on top of that, however, they see themselves as some kind of safety agent on the punishing power’s command.O presente artigo busca identificar, a partir de uma etnografia de decisões aplicada sobre 914 decisões judiciais que decretaram prisões preventivas nas audiências de custódia realizadas em Teresina entre agosto/2017 e julho/2018, os fundamentos das prisões decretadas e as representações dos magistrados a respeito dos processos de criminalização e de sua função na engrenagem punitiva. Os resultados colhidos apontaram uma significativa prevalência do fundamento “para garantia da ordem publica” nas justificativas das decisões aprisionadoras (82,38% - fundamento isolado; 13,89% - fundamento cumulado; 96,28%, ao todo), ademais da presença de decisões decretadas fora das hipóteses previstas em lei. A conclusão, a partir dos resultados, é de que, no período analisado, ressalvados casos muito específicos, nenhuma prisão preventiva decretada possuiu fundamento realmente cautelar numa perspectiva de segurança endoprocessual, mas consistiram, essencialmente, em antecipações de pena, que atendem ao populismo punitivo inflamado pela mídia de massas, mas que tolhem direitos e garantias fundamentais. Evidenciou-se, ademais, que os magistrados não reconhecem os processos de criminalização como resultado da atuação seletiva dos órgãos de repressão estatal, e que, ao revés, veem-se como agentes de segurança publica, no exercício do poder punitivo, apenas.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/55310.19092/reed.v9.553Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-28Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-282319-081710.19092/reed.v9reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/553/355Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeôncio Chaves, Paulo VictorSueli Rodrigues de Sousa, Maria2023-04-04T15:11:03Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/553Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2023-04-04T15:11:03Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES Desvelando discursos aprisionadores a partir de uma etnografia de decisões judiciais |
title |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES |
spellingShingle |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES Leôncio Chaves, Paulo Victor ethnography on documents; judicial decision acts; provisional detentions etnografia de documentos; decisões judiciais; prisões preventivas. |
title_short |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES |
title_full |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES |
title_fullStr |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES |
title_full_unstemmed |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES |
title_sort |
ETHNOGRAPHY ON JUDICIAL DECISIONS TO UNCOVER ARREST DISCOURSES |
author |
Leôncio Chaves, Paulo Victor |
author_facet |
Leôncio Chaves, Paulo Victor Sueli Rodrigues de Sousa, Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sueli Rodrigues de Sousa, Maria |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leôncio Chaves, Paulo Victor Sueli Rodrigues de Sousa, Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ethnography on documents; judicial decision acts; provisional detentions etnografia de documentos; decisões judiciais; prisões preventivas. |
topic |
ethnography on documents; judicial decision acts; provisional detentions etnografia de documentos; decisões judiciais; prisões preventivas. |
description |
This paper is the result of an empirical research that aimed to identify, through an ethnographic study on documents, applied on 914 provisional detention judicial acts pronounced during “custody hearings” that took place in Teresina from August/2017 to July/2018, the reasons to these detentions and the judges’ perception about criminalizing process and their role in the punishing wheel. The results showed us significant prevalence of the legal basis “para garantia da ordem pública” (82.38% - by itself; 13.89% - along with another legal basis; 96.28%, all together summed up); besides, the results showed us some detention acts were pronounced with no legal basis at all. We were taken to the conclusion that, apart from some really specific and countable cases, not only no detention act had a really cautious/provisional legal basis, in an intro-procedure perspective, but also they consisted in anticipated punishment, which suits well to what is yearned by some part of the population led by mass media, cutting through human rights and guarantees, though. It has become, someway, evident that judges cannot see criminalizing processes as the result of the repression state agencies selective actions; on top of that, however, they see themselves as some kind of safety agent on the punishing power’s command. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/553 10.19092/reed.v9.553 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/553 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v9.553 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/553/355 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-28 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-28 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v9 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138702448918528 |