Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/280 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of the proposals for amendment to the constitution (PEC) and Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality (ADI) from 1988 to 2016. Methodologically, it was used descriptive statistics to verify the PECs and ADIs per year. According to the results, despite the Brazilian constitutional rigidity, 95 amendments were made until 2016. 2014 was the year with the highest number of amendments (8). In relation to Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality, 2003 was the year with more ADIs filed, while 2002 was the year with the highest number of judgments. |
id |
RPED-1_9cdb673b81df215ca136a429ee3bc4ee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/280 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) EMENDAS CONSTITUCIONAIS E AÇÕES DIRETAS DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE NO BRASIL (1988-2016)The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of the proposals for amendment to the constitution (PEC) and Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality (ADI) from 1988 to 2016. Methodologically, it was used descriptive statistics to verify the PECs and ADIs per year. According to the results, despite the Brazilian constitutional rigidity, 95 amendments were made until 2016. 2014 was the year with the highest number of amendments (8). In relation to Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality, 2003 was the year with more ADIs filed, while 2002 was the year with the highest number of judgments.O propósito deste trabalho é apresentar uma análise acerca das propostas de emenda à constituição (PEC) e Ações Diretas de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI) no período de 1988 até 2016. Metodologicamente, foi utilizada estatística descritiva para verificar as PECs (propostas e promulgadas) e ADIs por ano. De acordo com os resultados, apesar da rigidez constitucional brasileira, foram realizados 95 emendamentos até 2016. 2014 foi o ano com maior quantidade de emendamentos (8). Em relação as Ações Diretas de Inconstitucionalidade, 2003 foi o ano com mais ADIs ajuizadas, enquanto que 2002 foi o ano com maior quantidade de julgamentos.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-01-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/28010.19092/reed.v5i3.280Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2018): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 5 n. 3 (2018): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v5i3reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/280/pdfCopyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Antônio Alves Tôrres2020-07-05T16:40:50Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/280Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:40:50Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) EMENDAS CONSTITUCIONAIS E AÇÕES DIRETAS DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE NO BRASIL (1988-2016) |
title |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) Fernandes, Antônio Alves Tôrres |
title_short |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) |
title_full |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) |
title_sort |
Brazilian constitutional amendments and direct actions of unconstitutionality (1988-2016) |
author |
Fernandes, Antônio Alves Tôrres |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Antônio Alves Tôrres |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Antônio Alves Tôrres |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of the proposals for amendment to the constitution (PEC) and Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality (ADI) from 1988 to 2016. Methodologically, it was used descriptive statistics to verify the PECs and ADIs per year. According to the results, despite the Brazilian constitutional rigidity, 95 amendments were made until 2016. 2014 was the year with the highest number of amendments (8). In relation to Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality, 2003 was the year with more ADIs filed, while 2002 was the year with the highest number of judgments. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/280 10.19092/reed.v5i3.280 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/280 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v5i3.280 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/280/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 5 No. 3 (2018): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 5 n. 3 (2018): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v5i3 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703504834560 |