The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fachetti Silvestre, Gilberto
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Figueira Marchiori, Bruna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/445
Resumo: Despite being a widely known and used concept, the requirements for configuring personal injury in concrete cases remain controversial in juridical literature and in courts. In the characterization of personal injury and in the setting of its pecuniary compensation, there is the influence of three different point of views: one that understands that personal injury is characterized by suffering, other that recognizes the damage as an injury to the personality right and a third line of thought that assumes that personal injury is presumable and one must demonstrate the harmful event and not the victim’s bad feelings. It is therefore necessary and useful to verify how the most recent case law of the Superior Court of Justice comprehends these requirements. To achieve the intended end, this research adopted as methodology a systematic review of case law, specifically relying on statistical analysis of tried cases in the scope of the STJ divisions.
id RPED-1_b11a4cd051f09d6ad9552a00f0b4686f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/445
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?As recentes caracterizações do dano moral no Superior Tribunal de Justiça: pretium doloris ou prejuízo in re ipsa?Moral damagesRights of personaliyPretium dolorisDamage in re ipsaSuperior Court of JusticeDano moralDireitos da personalidadePretium dolorisDano in re ipsaSuperior Tribunal de JustiçaDespite being a widely known and used concept, the requirements for configuring personal injury in concrete cases remain controversial in juridical literature and in courts. In the characterization of personal injury and in the setting of its pecuniary compensation, there is the influence of three different point of views: one that understands that personal injury is characterized by suffering, other that recognizes the damage as an injury to the personality right and a third line of thought that assumes that personal injury is presumable and one must demonstrate the harmful event and not the victim’s bad feelings. It is therefore necessary and useful to verify how the most recent case law of the Superior Court of Justice comprehends these requirements. To achieve the intended end, this research adopted as methodology a systematic review of case law, specifically relying on statistical analysis of tried cases in the scope of the STJ divisions.Apesar de ser um conceito amplamente conhecido, os requisitos para a configuração do dano moral em casos concretos continuam sendo controversos na literatura jurídica, no foro e nos tribunais. Na caracterização do dano moral e na fixação da sua compensação pecuniária (o quantum) há a influência de três pontos de vista: um que entende que dano moral é caracterizado pelo sofrimento (pretium doloris), outro que vê o dano como lesão a direito da personalidade e uma terceira corrente teórica que entende que o dano moral é presumível e deve-se comprovar o evento danoso e não os sentimentos ruins da vítima (in re ipsa). Mostrou-se, assim, necessário e útil, verificar como a jurisprudência mais recente do Superior Tribunal de Justiça compreende esses requisitos. Para atingir o fim proposto, a pesquisa adotou a metodologia de revisão sistemática da jurisprudência, especificamente recorrendo à análise estatística dos julgados no âmbito das turmas do STJ.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2020-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/44510.19092/reed.v7i3.445Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2020): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 221-237Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 7 n. 3 (2020): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 221-2372319-081710.19092/reed.v7i3reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/445/294Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFachetti Silvestre, GilbertoFigueira Marchiori, Bruna2020-10-15T19:37:21Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/445Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-10-15T19:37:21Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
As recentes caracterizações do dano moral no Superior Tribunal de Justiça: pretium doloris ou prejuízo in re ipsa?
title The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
spellingShingle The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
Fachetti Silvestre, Gilberto
Moral damages
Rights of personaliy
Pretium doloris
Damage in re ipsa
Superior Court of Justice
Dano moral
Direitos da personalidade
Pretium doloris
Dano in re ipsa
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
title_short The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
title_full The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
title_fullStr The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
title_full_unstemmed The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
title_sort The recent characterizations of moral damage in the Superior Court of Justice: pretium doloris or prejudice in re ipsa?
author Fachetti Silvestre, Gilberto
author_facet Fachetti Silvestre, Gilberto
Figueira Marchiori, Bruna
author_role author
author2 Figueira Marchiori, Bruna
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fachetti Silvestre, Gilberto
Figueira Marchiori, Bruna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Moral damages
Rights of personaliy
Pretium doloris
Damage in re ipsa
Superior Court of Justice
Dano moral
Direitos da personalidade
Pretium doloris
Dano in re ipsa
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
topic Moral damages
Rights of personaliy
Pretium doloris
Damage in re ipsa
Superior Court of Justice
Dano moral
Direitos da personalidade
Pretium doloris
Dano in re ipsa
Superior Tribunal de Justiça
description Despite being a widely known and used concept, the requirements for configuring personal injury in concrete cases remain controversial in juridical literature and in courts. In the characterization of personal injury and in the setting of its pecuniary compensation, there is the influence of three different point of views: one that understands that personal injury is characterized by suffering, other that recognizes the damage as an injury to the personality right and a third line of thought that assumes that personal injury is presumable and one must demonstrate the harmful event and not the victim’s bad feelings. It is therefore necessary and useful to verify how the most recent case law of the Superior Court of Justice comprehends these requirements. To achieve the intended end, this research adopted as methodology a systematic review of case law, specifically relying on statistical analysis of tried cases in the scope of the STJ divisions.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/445
10.19092/reed.v7i3.445
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/445
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v7i3.445
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/445/294
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2020): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 221-237
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 7 n. 3 (2020): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 221-237
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v7i3
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703629615104

Registros relacionados