From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/134 |
Resumo: | This article discusses the legal and social impact of the internalization, within the Brazilian law, of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD, 2008) and its regulations - through the Brazilian Law on the Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities (LBI). The focus of the analysis is the recognition of the legal capacity and the effectiveness of the human rights of persons with disabilities and their impact on legal institutions of guardianship and civil interdiction. To this end, a bibliographical and documentary research was conducted and, based on the theory of social justice, by Martha C. Nussbaum, embedded on the concept of capacity, as well as the critical theory of human rights, by Joaquín Herrera Flores. Our goal was to investigate whether the Brazilian Courts of Appeal had applied the CRPD. In theory, the higher the observance of the Convention, the greater the recognition of the autonomy and legal capacity of persons with disabilities; and thus lower the number of the cases of civil interdiction. The results obtained from the analysis of the data from the Court of Appeal of the state of Minas Gerais, from the period of 2010-2014, indicate findings on the opposite direction. |
id |
RPED-1_b6d3943dff3e44ea1837cafeb6685847 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/134 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilitiesDa interdição civil à tomada de decisão apoiada: uma transformação necessária ao reconhecimento da capacidade e dos direitos humanos da pessoa com deficiênciacapacidadecurateladireitos humanosinterdição civiltomada de decisão apoiadalegal capacityguardianshiphuman rightscivil interdictionsupported decision-makingThis article discusses the legal and social impact of the internalization, within the Brazilian law, of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD, 2008) and its regulations - through the Brazilian Law on the Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities (LBI). The focus of the analysis is the recognition of the legal capacity and the effectiveness of the human rights of persons with disabilities and their impact on legal institutions of guardianship and civil interdiction. To this end, a bibliographical and documentary research was conducted and, based on the theory of social justice, by Martha C. Nussbaum, embedded on the concept of capacity, as well as the critical theory of human rights, by Joaquín Herrera Flores. Our goal was to investigate whether the Brazilian Courts of Appeal had applied the CRPD. In theory, the higher the observance of the Convention, the greater the recognition of the autonomy and legal capacity of persons with disabilities; and thus lower the number of the cases of civil interdiction. The results obtained from the analysis of the data from the Court of Appeal of the state of Minas Gerais, from the period of 2010-2014, indicate findings on the opposite direction.Este artigo aborda o impacto jurídico e social da internalização, no Direito Brasileiro, da Convenção sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência (CDPD, 2008) e sua regulamentação - por meio da Lei Brasileira de Inclusão das Pessoas com Deficiência (LBI). O foco da análise será o reconhecimento da capacidade e da efetividade dos direitos humanos das pessoas com deficiência e seus reflexos nos institutos jurídicos da curatela e da interdição civil. Para tal, realizou-se pesquisa bibliográfica e documental e, a partir da teoria de justiça social, pautada pelas capacidades, de Martha C. Nussbaum, e da crítica dos direitos humanos, de Joaquín Herrera Flores, buscou-se verificar se os Tribunais de Justiça brasileiros têm aplicado a CDPD, pois, em tese, quanto maior a adesão à Convenção, maior o reconhecimento da autonomia e da capacidade das pessoas com deficiência; e, logo, menor o número de processos judiciais de interdição civil. Os resultados obtidos, por meio da análise dos dados do Tribunal de Justiça de Minas Gerais, relativos aos anos de 2010 a 2014, contudo, indicam outra direção.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/13410.19092/reed.v3i2.134Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 3 n. 2 (2016): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v3i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/134/120Pereira Alencar, CíceroAdolpho Daltin Assis, DanielBarbosa Musse, Lucianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:31:18Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/134Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:31:18Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities Da interdição civil à tomada de decisão apoiada: uma transformação necessária ao reconhecimento da capacidade e dos direitos humanos da pessoa com deficiência |
title |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities |
spellingShingle |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities Pereira Alencar, Cícero capacidade curatela direitos humanos interdição civil tomada de decisão apoiada legal capacity guardianship human rights civil interdiction supported decision-making |
title_short |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities |
title_full |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities |
title_fullStr |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities |
title_full_unstemmed |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities |
title_sort |
From civil interdiction to supported decision-making: a necessary change in the recognition of legal capacity and human rights of people with disabilities |
author |
Pereira Alencar, Cícero |
author_facet |
Pereira Alencar, Cícero Adolpho Daltin Assis, Daniel Barbosa Musse, Luciana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Adolpho Daltin Assis, Daniel Barbosa Musse, Luciana |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira Alencar, Cícero Adolpho Daltin Assis, Daniel Barbosa Musse, Luciana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
capacidade curatela direitos humanos interdição civil tomada de decisão apoiada legal capacity guardianship human rights civil interdiction supported decision-making |
topic |
capacidade curatela direitos humanos interdição civil tomada de decisão apoiada legal capacity guardianship human rights civil interdiction supported decision-making |
description |
This article discusses the legal and social impact of the internalization, within the Brazilian law, of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD, 2008) and its regulations - through the Brazilian Law on the Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities (LBI). The focus of the analysis is the recognition of the legal capacity and the effectiveness of the human rights of persons with disabilities and their impact on legal institutions of guardianship and civil interdiction. To this end, a bibliographical and documentary research was conducted and, based on the theory of social justice, by Martha C. Nussbaum, embedded on the concept of capacity, as well as the critical theory of human rights, by Joaquín Herrera Flores. Our goal was to investigate whether the Brazilian Courts of Appeal had applied the CRPD. In theory, the higher the observance of the Convention, the greater the recognition of the autonomy and legal capacity of persons with disabilities; and thus lower the number of the cases of civil interdiction. The results obtained from the analysis of the data from the Court of Appeal of the state of Minas Gerais, from the period of 2010-2014, indicate findings on the opposite direction. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/134 10.19092/reed.v3i2.134 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/134 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v3i2.134 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/134/120 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 3 n. 2 (2016): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v3i2 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703087501312 |