Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baptista, Bárbara Gomes Lupetti
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Duarte, Fernanda, Mario Iorio Filho, Rafael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/749
Resumo: Based on the assertion that Brazilian society is structured in a hierarchical manner, reproducing an aristocratic ethos as opposed to a republican order, we can recognize that, on a legal level, inequality operates on two levels: in the normative aspect – through lawmaking – and in conflict management, when the laws are applied, especially by the Judiciary. In this paper, we intend to problematize how judicial institutions in Brazil internalize and (re)produce legal inequalities – which became more evident with the Covid-19 pandemic and its consequences for the rights of Brazilians. To this end, we intend to describe a category of cases (the cases of requests for freedom of defendants arrested due to the Covid-19 pandemic, encouraged by National Council of Justice Recommendation n. 62/2020), which help to reveal this key of inequality.
id RPED-1_bca68b55642f20fc073cb09f5e09d9a2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/749
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic periodEntre liberdades e prisões: a desigualdade jurídica no tratamento dos pedidos de Habeas Corpus no período da pandemiabrazilian legal equalityjudiciaryhabeas corpuscovid-19igualdade jurídica brasileirajudiciáriohabeas corpuscovid-19Based on the assertion that Brazilian society is structured in a hierarchical manner, reproducing an aristocratic ethos as opposed to a republican order, we can recognize that, on a legal level, inequality operates on two levels: in the normative aspect – through lawmaking – and in conflict management, when the laws are applied, especially by the Judiciary. In this paper, we intend to problematize how judicial institutions in Brazil internalize and (re)produce legal inequalities – which became more evident with the Covid-19 pandemic and its consequences for the rights of Brazilians. To this end, we intend to describe a category of cases (the cases of requests for freedom of defendants arrested due to the Covid-19 pandemic, encouraged by National Council of Justice Recommendation n. 62/2020), which help to reveal this key of inequality.Partindo da afirmação de que a sociedade brasileira se estrutura de forma hierarquizada, reproduzindo um ethos aristocrático em contraposição a uma ordem republicana, podemos reconhecer que, no plano jurídico, a desigualdade se opera em dois níveis: no aspecto normativo – por meio da elaboração das leis – e na administração dos conflitos, quando da aplicação das leis, especialmente pelo Judiciário. Neste texto, pretendemos problematizar o modo como as instituições judiciárias no Brasil internalizam e (re)produzem desigualdades jurídicas – o que se tornou mais evidente com a pandemia de Covid-19 – e suas consequências para a esfera de direitos dos brasileiros. Para tanto, pretendemos descrever uma categoria de casos (os casos de pedidos de liberdade de réus presos, justificados pela superveniência da pandemia da Covid-19 e respaldados na Recomendação n. 62/2020 do CNJ), que ajudam a revelar essa chave da desigualdade.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2023-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/74910.19092/reed.v10.749Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Dossiê Administração Institucional de Crimes no Âmbito da Segurança Pública e da Justiça Criminal em Perspectiva Empírica; 1-26Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Dossiê Administração Institucional de Crimes no Âmbito da Segurança Pública e da Justiça Criminal em Perspectiva Empírica; 1-262319-081710.19092/reed.v10reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/749/465Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaptista, Bárbara Gomes Lupetti Duarte, FernandaMario Iorio Filho, Rafael2023-09-01T00:01:21Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/749Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2023-09-01T00:01:21Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
Entre liberdades e prisões: a desigualdade jurídica no tratamento dos pedidos de Habeas Corpus no período da pandemia
title Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
spellingShingle Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
Baptista, Bárbara Gomes Lupetti
brazilian legal equality
judiciary
habeas corpus
covid-19
igualdade jurídica brasileira
judiciário
habeas corpus
covid-19
title_short Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
title_full Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
title_fullStr Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
title_full_unstemmed Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
title_sort Between liberties and prisons: the legal inequality in the treatment of habeas corpus requests during the pandemic period
author Baptista, Bárbara Gomes Lupetti
author_facet Baptista, Bárbara Gomes Lupetti
Duarte, Fernanda
Mario Iorio Filho, Rafael
author_role author
author2 Duarte, Fernanda
Mario Iorio Filho, Rafael
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baptista, Bárbara Gomes Lupetti
Duarte, Fernanda
Mario Iorio Filho, Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv brazilian legal equality
judiciary
habeas corpus
covid-19
igualdade jurídica brasileira
judiciário
habeas corpus
covid-19
topic brazilian legal equality
judiciary
habeas corpus
covid-19
igualdade jurídica brasileira
judiciário
habeas corpus
covid-19
description Based on the assertion that Brazilian society is structured in a hierarchical manner, reproducing an aristocratic ethos as opposed to a republican order, we can recognize that, on a legal level, inequality operates on two levels: in the normative aspect – through lawmaking – and in conflict management, when the laws are applied, especially by the Judiciary. In this paper, we intend to problematize how judicial institutions in Brazil internalize and (re)produce legal inequalities – which became more evident with the Covid-19 pandemic and its consequences for the rights of Brazilians. To this end, we intend to describe a category of cases (the cases of requests for freedom of defendants arrested due to the Covid-19 pandemic, encouraged by National Council of Justice Recommendation n. 62/2020), which help to reveal this key of inequality.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/749
10.19092/reed.v10.749
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/749
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v10.749
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/749/465
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 10 (2023): Dossiê Administração Institucional de Crimes no Âmbito da Segurança Pública e da Justiça Criminal em Perspectiva Empírica; 1-26
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 10 (2023): Dossiê Administração Institucional de Crimes no Âmbito da Segurança Pública e da Justiça Criminal em Perspectiva Empírica; 1-26
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v10
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138702557970432

Registros relacionados