A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background and objectives To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n = 50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n = 50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n = 50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p < 0.05). Group III had lower number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop compared to that of Group I and Group II. Mean while Group I had higher number of squamous epithelial cells in the third drop compared to the other groups. The number of squamous epithelial cells in the first and third drops was statistically similar in each group respectively (p > 0.05 for each group). Conclusions In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles. |
id |
SBA-1_80e4ed567b981ee04bb87cca9f848202 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-70942017000500468 |
network_acronym_str |
SBA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport riskSpinal anesthesiaCerebrospinal fluidSpinal needlesEpithelial cellsAbstract Background and objectives To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n = 50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n = 50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n = 50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p < 0.05). Group III had lower number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop compared to that of Group I and Group II. Mean while Group I had higher number of squamous epithelial cells in the third drop compared to the other groups. The number of squamous epithelial cells in the first and third drops was statistically similar in each group respectively (p > 0.05 for each group). Conclusions In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.5 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2016.07.011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessÇiğdem,Ünal KantekinSevinç,ŞahinEsef,BolatSüreyya,ÖztürkMuzaffer,GencerAkif,Demireleng2017-09-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942017000500468Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2017-09-14T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk |
title |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk |
spellingShingle |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin Spinal anesthesia Cerebrospinal fluid Spinal needles Epithelial cells |
title_short |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk |
title_full |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk |
title_sort |
A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk |
author |
Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin |
author_facet |
Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin Sevinç,Şahin Esef,Bolat Süreyya,Öztürk Muzaffer,Gencer Akif,Demirel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sevinç,Şahin Esef,Bolat Süreyya,Öztürk Muzaffer,Gencer Akif,Demirel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin Sevinç,Şahin Esef,Bolat Süreyya,Öztürk Muzaffer,Gencer Akif,Demirel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spinal anesthesia Cerebrospinal fluid Spinal needles Epithelial cells |
topic |
Spinal anesthesia Cerebrospinal fluid Spinal needles Epithelial cells |
description |
Abstract Background and objectives To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n = 50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n = 50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n = 50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p < 0.05). Group III had lower number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop compared to that of Group I and Group II. Mean while Group I had higher number of squamous epithelial cells in the third drop compared to the other groups. The number of squamous epithelial cells in the first and third drops was statistically similar in each group respectively (p > 0.05 for each group). Conclusions In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjane.2016.07.011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.5 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) instacron:SBA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
instacron_str |
SBA |
institution |
SBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sba2000@openlink.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126629496225792 |