A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Sevinç,Şahin, Esef,Bolat, Süreyya,Öztürk, Muzaffer,Gencer, Akif,Demirel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468
Resumo: Abstract Background and objectives To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n = 50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n = 50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n = 50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p < 0.05). Group III had lower number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop compared to that of Group I and Group II. Mean while Group I had higher number of squamous epithelial cells in the third drop compared to the other groups. The number of squamous epithelial cells in the first and third drops was statistically similar in each group respectively (p > 0.05 for each group). Conclusions In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles.
id SBA-1_80e4ed567b981ee04bb87cca9f848202
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942017000500468
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport riskSpinal anesthesiaCerebrospinal fluidSpinal needlesEpithelial cellsAbstract Background and objectives To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n = 50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n = 50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n = 50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p < 0.05). Group III had lower number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop compared to that of Group I and Group II. Mean while Group I had higher number of squamous epithelial cells in the third drop compared to the other groups. The number of squamous epithelial cells in the first and third drops was statistically similar in each group respectively (p > 0.05 for each group). Conclusions In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.5 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2016.07.011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessÇiğdem,Ünal KantekinSevinç,ŞahinEsef,BolatSüreyya,ÖztürkMuzaffer,GencerAkif,Demireleng2017-09-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942017000500468Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2017-09-14T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
title A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
spellingShingle A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin
Spinal anesthesia
Cerebrospinal fluid
Spinal needles
Epithelial cells
title_short A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
title_full A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
title_fullStr A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
title_sort A comparison of three different needles used for spinal anesthesia in terms of squamous epithelial cell transport risk
author Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin
author_facet Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin
Sevinç,Şahin
Esef,Bolat
Süreyya,Öztürk
Muzaffer,Gencer
Akif,Demirel
author_role author
author2 Sevinç,Şahin
Esef,Bolat
Süreyya,Öztürk
Muzaffer,Gencer
Akif,Demirel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Çiğdem,Ünal Kantekin
Sevinç,Şahin
Esef,Bolat
Süreyya,Öztürk
Muzaffer,Gencer
Akif,Demirel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spinal anesthesia
Cerebrospinal fluid
Spinal needles
Epithelial cells
topic Spinal anesthesia
Cerebrospinal fluid
Spinal needles
Epithelial cells
description Abstract Background and objectives To investigate the differences in the number of squamous epithelial cells carried to the spinal canal by three different types of spinal needle tip of the same size. Methods Patients were allocated into three groups (Group I, Group II, Group III). Spinal anesthesia was administered to Group I (n = 50) using a 25G Quincke needle, to Group II (n = 50) using a 25G pencil point spinal needle, and to Group III (n = 50) using a non-cutting atraumatic needle with special bending. The first and third drops of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken from each patient and each drop was placed on a slide for cytological examination. Nucleated and non-nucleated squamous epithelial cells on the smear preparations were counted. Results There was statistically significant difference between the groups in respect to the number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop (p < 0.05). Group III had lower number of squamous epithelial cells in the first drop compared to that of Group I and Group II. Mean while Group I had higher number of squamous epithelial cells in the third drop compared to the other groups. The number of squamous epithelial cells in the first and third drops was statistically similar in each group respectively (p > 0.05 for each group). Conclusions In this study of different needle tips, it was seen that with atraumatic needle with special bending a significantly smaller number of cells were transported when compared to the Quincke tip needles, and with pencil point needles.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000500468
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2016.07.011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.5 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126629496225792