Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Belczak,Sergio Quilici
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Abrão,Sergio Ricardo, Bertoldi,Vinicius, Cavaquini,Thiago José, Slavo,Luiz Felipe Mansano, Sincos,Igor Rafael, Aun,Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492015000200133
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Many chronic renal patients lack autologous veins in the upper limbs suitable for construction of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Alternative fistula options for these patients should be evaluated and compared.OBJECTIVE: To compare different types of grafts used for brachioaxillary access in hemodialysis patients in terms of their patency and complication rates.METHOD: Forty-nine patients free from arterial system abnormalities and with no venous options for creation of arteriovenous fistulae in the arm and/or forearm underwent brachioaxillary bypass with implantation of autologous saphenous vein, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or PROPATEN(r) grafts. Patients were assessed by Doppler ultrasonography at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery,.RESULTS: The four first saphenous vein grafts had failed by 3 or 6 months after surgery. The autologous saphenous vein group was discontinued at the beginning of the study because of extreme difficulty in achieving puncture and hematoma formation. Failure rates of PTFE and PROPATEN(r) grafts did not differ after 3 (p = 0.559), 6 (p = 0.920), or 12 months (p = 0.514). A log-rank test applied to cumulative survival of grafts at 1 year (0.69 for PTFE, 0.79 for PROPATEN(r)) detected no significant differences (p = 0.938). There were no differences in complications resulting in graft failure between the two types of prosthetic graft.CONCLUSION: Autologous saphenous vein grafts do not appear to be a good option for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access because of difficulties with achieving puncture. Brachioaxillary fistulae constructed using PTFE or PROPATEN(r) grafts exhibited similar patency and complication rates. Further studies with large samples size are warranted to confirm our findings.
id SBACV-1_fd7f74bcd8ca1b6b12a0052c498e95dc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-54492015000200133
network_acronym_str SBACV-1
network_name_str Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative resultsarteriovenous fistularenal dialysissaphenous veinpolytetrafluoroethyleneheparinBACKGROUND: Many chronic renal patients lack autologous veins in the upper limbs suitable for construction of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Alternative fistula options for these patients should be evaluated and compared.OBJECTIVE: To compare different types of grafts used for brachioaxillary access in hemodialysis patients in terms of their patency and complication rates.METHOD: Forty-nine patients free from arterial system abnormalities and with no venous options for creation of arteriovenous fistulae in the arm and/or forearm underwent brachioaxillary bypass with implantation of autologous saphenous vein, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or PROPATEN(r) grafts. Patients were assessed by Doppler ultrasonography at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery,.RESULTS: The four first saphenous vein grafts had failed by 3 or 6 months after surgery. The autologous saphenous vein group was discontinued at the beginning of the study because of extreme difficulty in achieving puncture and hematoma formation. Failure rates of PTFE and PROPATEN(r) grafts did not differ after 3 (p = 0.559), 6 (p = 0.920), or 12 months (p = 0.514). A log-rank test applied to cumulative survival of grafts at 1 year (0.69 for PTFE, 0.79 for PROPATEN(r)) detected no significant differences (p = 0.938). There were no differences in complications resulting in graft failure between the two types of prosthetic graft.CONCLUSION: Autologous saphenous vein grafts do not appear to be a good option for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access because of difficulties with achieving puncture. Brachioaxillary fistulae constructed using PTFE or PROPATEN(r) grafts exhibited similar patency and complication rates. Further studies with large samples size are warranted to confirm our findings.Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492015000200133Jornal Vascular Brasileiro v.14 n.2 2015reponame:Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)instacron:SBACV10.1590/1677-5449.0055info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelczak,Sergio QuiliciAbrão,Sergio RicardoBertoldi,ViniciusCavaquini,Thiago JoséSlavo,Luiz Felipe MansanoSincos,Igor RafaelAun,Ricardoeng2015-08-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-54492015000200133Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jvbhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||secretaria@sbacv.org.br1677-73011677-5449opendoar:2015-08-20T00:00Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
title Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
spellingShingle Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
Belczak,Sergio Quilici
arteriovenous fistula
renal dialysis
saphenous vein
polytetrafluoroethylene
heparin
title_short Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
title_full Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
title_fullStr Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
title_full_unstemmed Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
title_sort Alternative grafts for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access: 1-year comparative results
author Belczak,Sergio Quilici
author_facet Belczak,Sergio Quilici
Abrão,Sergio Ricardo
Bertoldi,Vinicius
Cavaquini,Thiago José
Slavo,Luiz Felipe Mansano
Sincos,Igor Rafael
Aun,Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Abrão,Sergio Ricardo
Bertoldi,Vinicius
Cavaquini,Thiago José
Slavo,Luiz Felipe Mansano
Sincos,Igor Rafael
Aun,Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Belczak,Sergio Quilici
Abrão,Sergio Ricardo
Bertoldi,Vinicius
Cavaquini,Thiago José
Slavo,Luiz Felipe Mansano
Sincos,Igor Rafael
Aun,Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv arteriovenous fistula
renal dialysis
saphenous vein
polytetrafluoroethylene
heparin
topic arteriovenous fistula
renal dialysis
saphenous vein
polytetrafluoroethylene
heparin
description BACKGROUND: Many chronic renal patients lack autologous veins in the upper limbs suitable for construction of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Alternative fistula options for these patients should be evaluated and compared.OBJECTIVE: To compare different types of grafts used for brachioaxillary access in hemodialysis patients in terms of their patency and complication rates.METHOD: Forty-nine patients free from arterial system abnormalities and with no venous options for creation of arteriovenous fistulae in the arm and/or forearm underwent brachioaxillary bypass with implantation of autologous saphenous vein, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or PROPATEN(r) grafts. Patients were assessed by Doppler ultrasonography at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery,.RESULTS: The four first saphenous vein grafts had failed by 3 or 6 months after surgery. The autologous saphenous vein group was discontinued at the beginning of the study because of extreme difficulty in achieving puncture and hematoma formation. Failure rates of PTFE and PROPATEN(r) grafts did not differ after 3 (p = 0.559), 6 (p = 0.920), or 12 months (p = 0.514). A log-rank test applied to cumulative survival of grafts at 1 year (0.69 for PTFE, 0.79 for PROPATEN(r)) detected no significant differences (p = 0.938). There were no differences in complications resulting in graft failure between the two types of prosthetic graft.CONCLUSION: Autologous saphenous vein grafts do not appear to be a good option for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access because of difficulties with achieving puncture. Brachioaxillary fistulae constructed using PTFE or PROPATEN(r) grafts exhibited similar patency and complication rates. Further studies with large samples size are warranted to confirm our findings.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492015000200133
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492015000200133
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1677-5449.0055
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Vascular Brasileiro v.14 n.2 2015
reponame:Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
instacron:SBACV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
instacron_str SBACV
institution SBACV
reponame_str Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online)
collection Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||secretaria@sbacv.org.br
_version_ 1752126646941384704