Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Osório,Ana Paula Susin
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Quadros,Alexandre Schaan de, Vieira,José Luiz da Costa, Portal,Vera Lucia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500599
Resumo: Abstract The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine complete revascularization in these patients, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of this approach in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. For this reason, an adequate review of this evidence is essential in order to establish scientifically based strategy and achieve better outcomes for these patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. This review aims to present objectively the most recent evidence available on this topic.
id SBC-1_2b84a0b1cfe67744f39936b02254aca2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0066-782X2017001500599
network_acronym_str SBC-1
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Artery DiseaseStentsAbstract The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine complete revascularization in these patients, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of this approach in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. For this reason, an adequate review of this evidence is essential in order to establish scientifically based strategy and achieve better outcomes for these patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. This review aims to present objectively the most recent evidence available on this topic.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500599Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.6 2017reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20170174info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOsório,Ana Paula SusinQuadros,Alexandre Schaan deVieira,José Luiz da CostaPortal,Vera Luciaeng2018-01-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2017001500599Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2018-01-19T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
title Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
spellingShingle Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
Osório,Ana Paula Susin
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Revascularization
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease
Stents
title_short Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
title_full Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
title_fullStr Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
title_sort Percutaneous Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Culprit-only or Complete Revascularization?
author Osório,Ana Paula Susin
author_facet Osório,Ana Paula Susin
Quadros,Alexandre Schaan de
Vieira,José Luiz da Costa
Portal,Vera Lucia
author_role author
author2 Quadros,Alexandre Schaan de
Vieira,José Luiz da Costa
Portal,Vera Lucia
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Osório,Ana Paula Susin
Quadros,Alexandre Schaan de
Vieira,José Luiz da Costa
Portal,Vera Lucia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Revascularization
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease
Stents
topic Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Revascularization
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease
Stents
description Abstract The best approach of multivessel coronary artery disease in the context of acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention is one of the main reasons for controversy in cardiology. Although the main global guidelines do not recommend routine complete revascularization in these patients, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated benefit of this approach in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. For this reason, an adequate review of this evidence is essential in order to establish scientifically based strategy and achieve better outcomes for these patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. This review aims to present objectively the most recent evidence available on this topic.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500599
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500599
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/abc.20170174
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.6 2017
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@cardiol.br
_version_ 1752126568111538176

Registros relacionados