Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Villarraga,Hector R, Abduch,Maria Cristina Donadio, Lima,Marta Fernandes, Cruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana, Sbano,João Cesar Nunes, Voos,Mariana Callil, Mathias Junior,Wilson, Tsutsui,Jeane Mike
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023
Resumo: Abstract Background: Estimative of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a major indication for echocardiography. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) allows analysis of LV contraction mechanics which includes global longitudinal strain (GLS) and twist/torsion, both the most widely used. Direct comparison of correlations between these novel parameters and LVEF has never been done before. Objective: This study aims to check which one has the highest correlation with LVEF. Methods: Patients with normal LVEF (> 0,55) and systolic dysfunction (LVEF <0,55) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent echocardiogram with STE analysis. Correlation of variables was performed by linear regression analysis. In addition, correlation among levels of LV systolic impairment was also tested. Results: A total of 131 patients were included (mean age, 46 ± 14y; 43%, men). LVEF and GLS showed a strong correlation (r = 0.95; r2 = 0.89; p < 0.001), more evident in groups with LV systolic dysfunction than those with preserved LVEF. Good correlation was also found with global longitudinal strain rate (r = 0.85; r2 = 0.73; p < 0.001). Comparing to GLS, correlation of LVEF and torsional mechanics was weaker: twist (r = 0.78; r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001); torsion (r = 0.75; r2 = 0.56; p < 0.001). Conclusion: GLS of the left ventricle have highly strong positive correlation with the classical parameter of ejection fraction, especially in cases with LV systolic impairment. Longitudinal strain rate also demonstrated a good correlation. GLS increments analysis of LV systolic function. On the other hand, although being a cornerstone of LV mechanics, twist and torsion have a weaker correlation with LV ejection, comparing to GLS.
id SBC-1_84cfe4326f6093a2d11de5b0422a6b69
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0066-782X2017000700023
network_acronym_str SBC-1
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?Stroke VolumeTorsion,MechanicalStrainTorsion AbnormalityEchocardiography,DopplerVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAbstract Background: Estimative of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a major indication for echocardiography. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) allows analysis of LV contraction mechanics which includes global longitudinal strain (GLS) and twist/torsion, both the most widely used. Direct comparison of correlations between these novel parameters and LVEF has never been done before. Objective: This study aims to check which one has the highest correlation with LVEF. Methods: Patients with normal LVEF (> 0,55) and systolic dysfunction (LVEF <0,55) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent echocardiogram with STE analysis. Correlation of variables was performed by linear regression analysis. In addition, correlation among levels of LV systolic impairment was also tested. Results: A total of 131 patients were included (mean age, 46 ± 14y; 43%, men). LVEF and GLS showed a strong correlation (r = 0.95; r2 = 0.89; p < 0.001), more evident in groups with LV systolic dysfunction than those with preserved LVEF. Good correlation was also found with global longitudinal strain rate (r = 0.85; r2 = 0.73; p < 0.001). Comparing to GLS, correlation of LVEF and torsional mechanics was weaker: twist (r = 0.78; r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001); torsion (r = 0.75; r2 = 0.56; p < 0.001). Conclusion: GLS of the left ventricle have highly strong positive correlation with the classical parameter of ejection fraction, especially in cases with LV systolic impairment. Longitudinal strain rate also demonstrated a good correlation. GLS increments analysis of LV systolic function. On the other hand, although being a cornerstone of LV mechanics, twist and torsion have a weaker correlation with LV ejection, comparing to GLS.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2017-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.1 2017reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20170085info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Marcio Silva MiguelVillarraga,Hector RAbduch,Maria Cristina DonadioLima,Marta FernandesCruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt VianaSbano,João Cesar NunesVoos,Mariana CallilMathias Junior,WilsonTsutsui,Jeane Mikeeng2017-07-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2017000700023Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2017-07-28T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
title Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
spellingShingle Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel
Stroke Volume
Torsion,Mechanical
Strain
Torsion Abnormality
Echocardiography,Doppler
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
title_short Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
title_full Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
title_fullStr Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
title_full_unstemmed Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
title_sort Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
author Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel
author_facet Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel
Villarraga,Hector R
Abduch,Maria Cristina Donadio
Lima,Marta Fernandes
Cruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana
Sbano,João Cesar Nunes
Voos,Mariana Callil
Mathias Junior,Wilson
Tsutsui,Jeane Mike
author_role author
author2 Villarraga,Hector R
Abduch,Maria Cristina Donadio
Lima,Marta Fernandes
Cruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana
Sbano,João Cesar Nunes
Voos,Mariana Callil
Mathias Junior,Wilson
Tsutsui,Jeane Mike
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel
Villarraga,Hector R
Abduch,Maria Cristina Donadio
Lima,Marta Fernandes
Cruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana
Sbano,João Cesar Nunes
Voos,Mariana Callil
Mathias Junior,Wilson
Tsutsui,Jeane Mike
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Stroke Volume
Torsion,Mechanical
Strain
Torsion Abnormality
Echocardiography,Doppler
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
topic Stroke Volume
Torsion,Mechanical
Strain
Torsion Abnormality
Echocardiography,Doppler
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
description Abstract Background: Estimative of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a major indication for echocardiography. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) allows analysis of LV contraction mechanics which includes global longitudinal strain (GLS) and twist/torsion, both the most widely used. Direct comparison of correlations between these novel parameters and LVEF has never been done before. Objective: This study aims to check which one has the highest correlation with LVEF. Methods: Patients with normal LVEF (> 0,55) and systolic dysfunction (LVEF <0,55) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent echocardiogram with STE analysis. Correlation of variables was performed by linear regression analysis. In addition, correlation among levels of LV systolic impairment was also tested. Results: A total of 131 patients were included (mean age, 46 ± 14y; 43%, men). LVEF and GLS showed a strong correlation (r = 0.95; r2 = 0.89; p < 0.001), more evident in groups with LV systolic dysfunction than those with preserved LVEF. Good correlation was also found with global longitudinal strain rate (r = 0.85; r2 = 0.73; p < 0.001). Comparing to GLS, correlation of LVEF and torsional mechanics was weaker: twist (r = 0.78; r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001); torsion (r = 0.75; r2 = 0.56; p < 0.001). Conclusion: GLS of the left ventricle have highly strong positive correlation with the classical parameter of ejection fraction, especially in cases with LV systolic impairment. Longitudinal strain rate also demonstrated a good correlation. GLS increments analysis of LV systolic function. On the other hand, although being a cornerstone of LV mechanics, twist and torsion have a weaker correlation with LV ejection, comparing to GLS.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/abc.20170085
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.1 2017
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@cardiol.br
_version_ 1752126567782285312