Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background: Estimative of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a major indication for echocardiography. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) allows analysis of LV contraction mechanics which includes global longitudinal strain (GLS) and twist/torsion, both the most widely used. Direct comparison of correlations between these novel parameters and LVEF has never been done before. Objective: This study aims to check which one has the highest correlation with LVEF. Methods: Patients with normal LVEF (> 0,55) and systolic dysfunction (LVEF <0,55) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent echocardiogram with STE analysis. Correlation of variables was performed by linear regression analysis. In addition, correlation among levels of LV systolic impairment was also tested. Results: A total of 131 patients were included (mean age, 46 ± 14y; 43%, men). LVEF and GLS showed a strong correlation (r = 0.95; r2 = 0.89; p < 0.001), more evident in groups with LV systolic dysfunction than those with preserved LVEF. Good correlation was also found with global longitudinal strain rate (r = 0.85; r2 = 0.73; p < 0.001). Comparing to GLS, correlation of LVEF and torsional mechanics was weaker: twist (r = 0.78; r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001); torsion (r = 0.75; r2 = 0.56; p < 0.001). Conclusion: GLS of the left ventricle have highly strong positive correlation with the classical parameter of ejection fraction, especially in cases with LV systolic impairment. Longitudinal strain rate also demonstrated a good correlation. GLS increments analysis of LV systolic function. On the other hand, although being a cornerstone of LV mechanics, twist and torsion have a weaker correlation with LV ejection, comparing to GLS. |
id |
SBC-1_84cfe4326f6093a2d11de5b0422a6b69 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0066-782X2017000700023 |
network_acronym_str |
SBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction?Stroke VolumeTorsion,MechanicalStrainTorsion AbnormalityEchocardiography,DopplerVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAbstract Background: Estimative of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a major indication for echocardiography. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) allows analysis of LV contraction mechanics which includes global longitudinal strain (GLS) and twist/torsion, both the most widely used. Direct comparison of correlations between these novel parameters and LVEF has never been done before. Objective: This study aims to check which one has the highest correlation with LVEF. Methods: Patients with normal LVEF (> 0,55) and systolic dysfunction (LVEF <0,55) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent echocardiogram with STE analysis. Correlation of variables was performed by linear regression analysis. In addition, correlation among levels of LV systolic impairment was also tested. Results: A total of 131 patients were included (mean age, 46 ± 14y; 43%, men). LVEF and GLS showed a strong correlation (r = 0.95; r2 = 0.89; p < 0.001), more evident in groups with LV systolic dysfunction than those with preserved LVEF. Good correlation was also found with global longitudinal strain rate (r = 0.85; r2 = 0.73; p < 0.001). Comparing to GLS, correlation of LVEF and torsional mechanics was weaker: twist (r = 0.78; r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001); torsion (r = 0.75; r2 = 0.56; p < 0.001). Conclusion: GLS of the left ventricle have highly strong positive correlation with the classical parameter of ejection fraction, especially in cases with LV systolic impairment. Longitudinal strain rate also demonstrated a good correlation. GLS increments analysis of LV systolic function. On the other hand, although being a cornerstone of LV mechanics, twist and torsion have a weaker correlation with LV ejection, comparing to GLS.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2017-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.1 2017reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20170085info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Marcio Silva MiguelVillarraga,Hector RAbduch,Maria Cristina DonadioLima,Marta FernandesCruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt VianaSbano,João Cesar NunesVoos,Mariana CallilMathias Junior,WilsonTsutsui,Jeane Mikeeng2017-07-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2017000700023Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2017-07-28T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? |
title |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? |
spellingShingle |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel Stroke Volume Torsion,Mechanical Strain Torsion Abnormality Echocardiography,Doppler Ventricular Dysfunction, Left |
title_short |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? |
title_full |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? |
title_fullStr |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? |
title_sort |
Global Longitudinal Strain or Left Ventricular Twist and Torsion? Which Correlates Best with Ejection Fraction? |
author |
Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel |
author_facet |
Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel Villarraga,Hector R Abduch,Maria Cristina Donadio Lima,Marta Fernandes Cruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Sbano,João Cesar Nunes Voos,Mariana Callil Mathias Junior,Wilson Tsutsui,Jeane Mike |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Villarraga,Hector R Abduch,Maria Cristina Donadio Lima,Marta Fernandes Cruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Sbano,João Cesar Nunes Voos,Mariana Callil Mathias Junior,Wilson Tsutsui,Jeane Mike |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima,Marcio Silva Miguel Villarraga,Hector R Abduch,Maria Cristina Donadio Lima,Marta Fernandes Cruz,Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Sbano,João Cesar Nunes Voos,Mariana Callil Mathias Junior,Wilson Tsutsui,Jeane Mike |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stroke Volume Torsion,Mechanical Strain Torsion Abnormality Echocardiography,Doppler Ventricular Dysfunction, Left |
topic |
Stroke Volume Torsion,Mechanical Strain Torsion Abnormality Echocardiography,Doppler Ventricular Dysfunction, Left |
description |
Abstract Background: Estimative of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a major indication for echocardiography. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) allows analysis of LV contraction mechanics which includes global longitudinal strain (GLS) and twist/torsion, both the most widely used. Direct comparison of correlations between these novel parameters and LVEF has never been done before. Objective: This study aims to check which one has the highest correlation with LVEF. Methods: Patients with normal LVEF (> 0,55) and systolic dysfunction (LVEF <0,55) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent echocardiogram with STE analysis. Correlation of variables was performed by linear regression analysis. In addition, correlation among levels of LV systolic impairment was also tested. Results: A total of 131 patients were included (mean age, 46 ± 14y; 43%, men). LVEF and GLS showed a strong correlation (r = 0.95; r2 = 0.89; p < 0.001), more evident in groups with LV systolic dysfunction than those with preserved LVEF. Good correlation was also found with global longitudinal strain rate (r = 0.85; r2 = 0.73; p < 0.001). Comparing to GLS, correlation of LVEF and torsional mechanics was weaker: twist (r = 0.78; r2 = 0.60; p < 0.001); torsion (r = 0.75; r2 = 0.56; p < 0.001). Conclusion: GLS of the left ventricle have highly strong positive correlation with the classical parameter of ejection fraction, especially in cases with LV systolic impairment. Longitudinal strain rate also demonstrated a good correlation. GLS increments analysis of LV systolic function. On the other hand, although being a cornerstone of LV mechanics, twist and torsion have a weaker correlation with LV ejection, comparing to GLS. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017000700023 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/abc.20170085 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.1 2017 reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) instacron:SBC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
instacron_str |
SBC |
institution |
SBC |
reponame_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||arquivos@cardiol.br |
_version_ |
1752126567782285312 |