Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa,Eduardo Cantoni
Data de Publicação: 2001
Outros Autores: Moisés,Valdir Ambrósio, Sesso,Ricardo Cintra, Kohlmann,Nárcia E. B., Plavnik,Frida Liane, Zanella,Maria Teresa, Ribeiro,Artur Beltrame, Kohlmann Júnior,Osvaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2001000500002
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate 2 left ventricular mass index (LVMI) normality criteria for the prevalence of left ventricular geometric patterns in a hypertensive population ( HT ) . METHODS: 544 essential hypertensive patients, were evaluated by echocardiography, and different left ventricular hypertrophy criteria were applied: 1 - classic : men - 134 g/m² and women - 110 g/m² ; 2- obtained from the 95th percentil of LVMI from a normotensive population (NT). RESULTS: The prevalence of 4 left ventricular geometric patterns, respectively for criteria 1 and 2, were: normal geometry - 47.7% and 39.3%; concentric remodelying - 25.4% and 14.3%; concentric hypertrophy - 18.4% and 27.7% and excentric hypertrophy - 8.8% and 16.7%, which confered abnormal geometry to 52.6% and 60.7% of hypertensive. The comparative analysis between NT and normal geometry hypertensive group according to criteria 1, detected significative stuctural differences,"( *p < 0.05):LVMI- 78.4 ± 1.50 vs 85.9 ±0.95 g/m² *; posterior wall thickness -8.5 ± 0.1 vs 8.9 ± 0.05 mm*; left atrium - 33.3 ± 0.41 vs 34.7 ± 0.30 mm *. With criteria 2, significative structural differences between the 2 groups were not observed. CONCLUSION: The use of a reference population based criteria, increased the abnormal left ventricular geometry prevalence in hypertensive patients and seemed more appropriate for left ventricular hypertrophy detection and risk stratification.
id SBC-1_ad97a90902afe6a00646dc598989ecf3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0066-782X2001000500002
network_acronym_str SBC-1
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratificationessential hypertensionleft ventricular hypertrophycriteria of hypertrophyPURPOSE: To evaluate 2 left ventricular mass index (LVMI) normality criteria for the prevalence of left ventricular geometric patterns in a hypertensive population ( HT ) . METHODS: 544 essential hypertensive patients, were evaluated by echocardiography, and different left ventricular hypertrophy criteria were applied: 1 - classic : men - 134 g/m² and women - 110 g/m² ; 2- obtained from the 95th percentil of LVMI from a normotensive population (NT). RESULTS: The prevalence of 4 left ventricular geometric patterns, respectively for criteria 1 and 2, were: normal geometry - 47.7% and 39.3%; concentric remodelying - 25.4% and 14.3%; concentric hypertrophy - 18.4% and 27.7% and excentric hypertrophy - 8.8% and 16.7%, which confered abnormal geometry to 52.6% and 60.7% of hypertensive. The comparative analysis between NT and normal geometry hypertensive group according to criteria 1, detected significative stuctural differences,"( *p < 0.05):LVMI- 78.4 ± 1.50 vs 85.9 ±0.95 g/m² *; posterior wall thickness -8.5 ± 0.1 vs 8.9 ± 0.05 mm*; left atrium - 33.3 ± 0.41 vs 34.7 ± 0.30 mm *. With criteria 2, significative structural differences between the 2 groups were not observed. CONCLUSION: The use of a reference population based criteria, increased the abnormal left ventricular geometry prevalence in hypertensive patients and seemed more appropriate for left ventricular hypertrophy detection and risk stratification.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2001-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2001000500002Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.76 n.5 2001reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.1590/S0066-782X2001000500002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosa,Eduardo CantoniMoisés,Valdir AmbrósioSesso,Ricardo CintraKohlmann,Nárcia E. B.Plavnik,Frida LianeZanella,Maria TeresaRibeiro,Artur BeltrameKohlmann Júnior,Osvaldoeng2002-01-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2001000500002Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2002-01-08T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
title Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
spellingShingle Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
Rosa,Eduardo Cantoni
essential hypertension
left ventricular hypertrophy
criteria of hypertrophy
title_short Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
title_full Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
title_fullStr Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
title_sort Distribution of cardiac geometric patterns on echocardiography in essential hypertension. Impact of two criteria of stratification
author Rosa,Eduardo Cantoni
author_facet Rosa,Eduardo Cantoni
Moisés,Valdir Ambrósio
Sesso,Ricardo Cintra
Kohlmann,Nárcia E. B.
Plavnik,Frida Liane
Zanella,Maria Teresa
Ribeiro,Artur Beltrame
Kohlmann Júnior,Osvaldo
author_role author
author2 Moisés,Valdir Ambrósio
Sesso,Ricardo Cintra
Kohlmann,Nárcia E. B.
Plavnik,Frida Liane
Zanella,Maria Teresa
Ribeiro,Artur Beltrame
Kohlmann Júnior,Osvaldo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa,Eduardo Cantoni
Moisés,Valdir Ambrósio
Sesso,Ricardo Cintra
Kohlmann,Nárcia E. B.
Plavnik,Frida Liane
Zanella,Maria Teresa
Ribeiro,Artur Beltrame
Kohlmann Júnior,Osvaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv essential hypertension
left ventricular hypertrophy
criteria of hypertrophy
topic essential hypertension
left ventricular hypertrophy
criteria of hypertrophy
description PURPOSE: To evaluate 2 left ventricular mass index (LVMI) normality criteria for the prevalence of left ventricular geometric patterns in a hypertensive population ( HT ) . METHODS: 544 essential hypertensive patients, were evaluated by echocardiography, and different left ventricular hypertrophy criteria were applied: 1 - classic : men - 134 g/m² and women - 110 g/m² ; 2- obtained from the 95th percentil of LVMI from a normotensive population (NT). RESULTS: The prevalence of 4 left ventricular geometric patterns, respectively for criteria 1 and 2, were: normal geometry - 47.7% and 39.3%; concentric remodelying - 25.4% and 14.3%; concentric hypertrophy - 18.4% and 27.7% and excentric hypertrophy - 8.8% and 16.7%, which confered abnormal geometry to 52.6% and 60.7% of hypertensive. The comparative analysis between NT and normal geometry hypertensive group according to criteria 1, detected significative stuctural differences,"( *p < 0.05):LVMI- 78.4 ± 1.50 vs 85.9 ±0.95 g/m² *; posterior wall thickness -8.5 ± 0.1 vs 8.9 ± 0.05 mm*; left atrium - 33.3 ± 0.41 vs 34.7 ± 0.30 mm *. With criteria 2, significative structural differences between the 2 groups were not observed. CONCLUSION: The use of a reference population based criteria, increased the abnormal left ventricular geometry prevalence in hypertensive patients and seemed more appropriate for left ventricular hypertrophy detection and risk stratification.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2001000500002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2001000500002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0066-782X2001000500002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.76 n.5 2001
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@cardiol.br
_version_ 1752126551637360640