Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meneguz-Moreno,Rafael Alexandre
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Castro-Filho,Antônio de, Ramos,Auristela Isabel de Oliveira, Zumarraga,Mayra, Bihan,David Le, Barretto,Rodrigo, Siqueira,Dimytri Alexandre de Alvim, Abizaid,Alexandre Antonio Cunha, Sousa,Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego, Sousa,J. Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500590
Resumo: Abstract Background: The impact of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the impact of PVR on mortality and hospital readmission one year after TAVI. Methods: Between January 2009 and June 2015, a total of 251 patients underwent TAVI with three different prostheses at two cardiology centers. Patients were assessed according to PVR severity after the procedure. Results: PVR was classified as absent/trace or mild in 92.0% (n = 242) and moderate/severe in 7.1% (n = 18). The moderate/severe PVR group showed higher levels of aortic calcification (22% vs. 6%, p = 0.03), higher serum creatinine (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dL, p = 0.014), lower aortic valve area (0.6 ± 0.1 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2, p = 0.05), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (49.2 ± 14.8% vs. 58.8 ± 12.1%, p = 0.009). Patients with moderate/severe PVR had more need for post-dilatation (p = 0.025) and use of larger-diameter balloons (p = 0.043). At one year, all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (16.7% vs. 12%, p = 0.08), as well as rehospitalization (11.1% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.915). PVR grade significantly reduced throughout the first year after the procedure (p < 0.01). The presence of moderate/severe PVR was not associated with higher one-year mortality rates (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.27-2.13, p = 0.864), rehospitalization (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.25-4.69, p=0.915), or composite outcome (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.28-2.13, p = 0.613). Conclusion: In this sample, moderate/severe PVR was not a predictor of long-term mortality or rehospitalization. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)
id SBC-1_dfcf68ae961428cc631d9bc22dbb0475
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0066-782X2017001500590
network_acronym_str SBC-1
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationAortic Valve Insufficiency / complicationsHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationPrognosisMortalityAbstract Background: The impact of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the impact of PVR on mortality and hospital readmission one year after TAVI. Methods: Between January 2009 and June 2015, a total of 251 patients underwent TAVI with three different prostheses at two cardiology centers. Patients were assessed according to PVR severity after the procedure. Results: PVR was classified as absent/trace or mild in 92.0% (n = 242) and moderate/severe in 7.1% (n = 18). The moderate/severe PVR group showed higher levels of aortic calcification (22% vs. 6%, p = 0.03), higher serum creatinine (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dL, p = 0.014), lower aortic valve area (0.6 ± 0.1 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2, p = 0.05), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (49.2 ± 14.8% vs. 58.8 ± 12.1%, p = 0.009). Patients with moderate/severe PVR had more need for post-dilatation (p = 0.025) and use of larger-diameter balloons (p = 0.043). At one year, all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (16.7% vs. 12%, p = 0.08), as well as rehospitalization (11.1% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.915). PVR grade significantly reduced throughout the first year after the procedure (p < 0.01). The presence of moderate/severe PVR was not associated with higher one-year mortality rates (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.27-2.13, p = 0.864), rehospitalization (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.25-4.69, p=0.915), or composite outcome (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.28-2.13, p = 0.613). Conclusion: In this sample, moderate/severe PVR was not a predictor of long-term mortality or rehospitalization. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500590Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.6 2017reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20170172info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeneguz-Moreno,Rafael AlexandreCastro-Filho,Antônio deRamos,Auristela Isabel de OliveiraZumarraga,MayraBihan,David LeBarretto,RodrigoSiqueira,Dimytri Alexandre de AlvimAbizaid,Alexandre Antonio CunhaSousa,Amanda Guerra de Moraes RegoSousa,J. Eduardoeng2018-01-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2017001500590Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2018-01-19T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
spellingShingle Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Meneguz-Moreno,Rafael Alexandre
Aortic Valve Insufficiency / complications
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Prognosis
Mortality
title_short Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_fullStr Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_sort Progression and Prognosis of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
author Meneguz-Moreno,Rafael Alexandre
author_facet Meneguz-Moreno,Rafael Alexandre
Castro-Filho,Antônio de
Ramos,Auristela Isabel de Oliveira
Zumarraga,Mayra
Bihan,David Le
Barretto,Rodrigo
Siqueira,Dimytri Alexandre de Alvim
Abizaid,Alexandre Antonio Cunha
Sousa,Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego
Sousa,J. Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Castro-Filho,Antônio de
Ramos,Auristela Isabel de Oliveira
Zumarraga,Mayra
Bihan,David Le
Barretto,Rodrigo
Siqueira,Dimytri Alexandre de Alvim
Abizaid,Alexandre Antonio Cunha
Sousa,Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego
Sousa,J. Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meneguz-Moreno,Rafael Alexandre
Castro-Filho,Antônio de
Ramos,Auristela Isabel de Oliveira
Zumarraga,Mayra
Bihan,David Le
Barretto,Rodrigo
Siqueira,Dimytri Alexandre de Alvim
Abizaid,Alexandre Antonio Cunha
Sousa,Amanda Guerra de Moraes Rego
Sousa,J. Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aortic Valve Insufficiency / complications
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Prognosis
Mortality
topic Aortic Valve Insufficiency / complications
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Prognosis
Mortality
description Abstract Background: The impact of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the impact of PVR on mortality and hospital readmission one year after TAVI. Methods: Between January 2009 and June 2015, a total of 251 patients underwent TAVI with three different prostheses at two cardiology centers. Patients were assessed according to PVR severity after the procedure. Results: PVR was classified as absent/trace or mild in 92.0% (n = 242) and moderate/severe in 7.1% (n = 18). The moderate/severe PVR group showed higher levels of aortic calcification (22% vs. 6%, p = 0.03), higher serum creatinine (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dL, p = 0.014), lower aortic valve area (0.6 ± 0.1 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2, p = 0.05), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (49.2 ± 14.8% vs. 58.8 ± 12.1%, p = 0.009). Patients with moderate/severe PVR had more need for post-dilatation (p = 0.025) and use of larger-diameter balloons (p = 0.043). At one year, all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (16.7% vs. 12%, p = 0.08), as well as rehospitalization (11.1% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.915). PVR grade significantly reduced throughout the first year after the procedure (p < 0.01). The presence of moderate/severe PVR was not associated with higher one-year mortality rates (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.27-2.13, p = 0.864), rehospitalization (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.25-4.69, p=0.915), or composite outcome (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.28-2.13, p = 0.613). Conclusion: In this sample, moderate/severe PVR was not a predictor of long-term mortality or rehospitalization. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500590
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2017001500590
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/abc.20170172
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.109 n.6 2017
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@cardiol.br
_version_ 1752126568098955264