Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Issa,Aurora Felice Castro
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Pittella,Felipe, Leandro,Sergio Martins, Paço,Patricia, Tadeu,Judas, Felix,Renata
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472018000400333
Resumo: Abstract Background: Moderate coronary artery lesions can be, or not, responsible for myocardial ischemia. The functional analysis of these lesions can be performed by invasive and noninvasive methods. Objective: To compare the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods: 47 patients with stable coronary artery disease and at least one moderate coronary artery obstruction were prospectively studied. They were submitted to fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with a median interval of 24.5 days between January 2013 and December 2015. There was no change in clinical status or revascularization procedure between the exams. The population variables were described as medians and interquartile range. Fractional flow reserve was performed in one left main coronary artery; 37 left descending coronary arteries; 12 circumflex arteries and 4 right coronary arteries. Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was considered positive. The comparative analysis between the results of the tests was performed by two-tailed Fisher’s test and a p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was found in the left main coronary artery (100%); 13 in the left descending coronary artery (35.14%); 6 in circumflex artery (50%) and 2 in the right coronary artery (50%). Among the patients with positive fractional flow reserve, 83% had myocardial ischemia demonstrated by the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.058). When analyzing specifically the left descending coronary artery, 83% of the patients with negative fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, but 69% of the patients with positive fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.413). Conclusion: Disagreements can occur between the results of the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by invasive and noninvasive tests.
id SBC-2_01cb0a2e41129c70e9a78e8df2f7c7d2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2359-56472018000400333
network_acronym_str SBC-2
network_name_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion ScintigraphyMyocardial IschemiaPraqctional Flow Reserve, MyocardialMyocardial Perfusion / Diagnostic ImagingMicrovascular AnginaAbstract Background: Moderate coronary artery lesions can be, or not, responsible for myocardial ischemia. The functional analysis of these lesions can be performed by invasive and noninvasive methods. Objective: To compare the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods: 47 patients with stable coronary artery disease and at least one moderate coronary artery obstruction were prospectively studied. They were submitted to fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with a median interval of 24.5 days between January 2013 and December 2015. There was no change in clinical status or revascularization procedure between the exams. The population variables were described as medians and interquartile range. Fractional flow reserve was performed in one left main coronary artery; 37 left descending coronary arteries; 12 circumflex arteries and 4 right coronary arteries. Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was considered positive. The comparative analysis between the results of the tests was performed by two-tailed Fisher’s test and a p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was found in the left main coronary artery (100%); 13 in the left descending coronary artery (35.14%); 6 in circumflex artery (50%) and 2 in the right coronary artery (50%). Among the patients with positive fractional flow reserve, 83% had myocardial ischemia demonstrated by the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.058). When analyzing specifically the left descending coronary artery, 83% of the patients with negative fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, but 69% of the patients with positive fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.413). Conclusion: Disagreements can occur between the results of the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by invasive and noninvasive tests.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472018000400333International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.31 n.4 2018reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/2359-4802.20180021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIssa,Aurora Felice CastroPittella,FelipeLeandro,Sergio MartinsPaço,PatriciaTadeu,JudasFelix,Renataeng2018-07-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2359-56472018000400333Revistahttp://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/ijcshttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br2359-56472359-4802opendoar:2018-07-12T00:00International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
title Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
spellingShingle Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
Issa,Aurora Felice Castro
Myocardial Ischemia
Praqctional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Myocardial Perfusion / Diagnostic Imaging
Microvascular Angina
title_short Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
title_full Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
title_fullStr Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
title_sort Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
author Issa,Aurora Felice Castro
author_facet Issa,Aurora Felice Castro
Pittella,Felipe
Leandro,Sergio Martins
Paço,Patricia
Tadeu,Judas
Felix,Renata
author_role author
author2 Pittella,Felipe
Leandro,Sergio Martins
Paço,Patricia
Tadeu,Judas
Felix,Renata
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Issa,Aurora Felice Castro
Pittella,Felipe
Leandro,Sergio Martins
Paço,Patricia
Tadeu,Judas
Felix,Renata
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Myocardial Ischemia
Praqctional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Myocardial Perfusion / Diagnostic Imaging
Microvascular Angina
topic Myocardial Ischemia
Praqctional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Myocardial Perfusion / Diagnostic Imaging
Microvascular Angina
description Abstract Background: Moderate coronary artery lesions can be, or not, responsible for myocardial ischemia. The functional analysis of these lesions can be performed by invasive and noninvasive methods. Objective: To compare the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods: 47 patients with stable coronary artery disease and at least one moderate coronary artery obstruction were prospectively studied. They were submitted to fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with a median interval of 24.5 days between January 2013 and December 2015. There was no change in clinical status or revascularization procedure between the exams. The population variables were described as medians and interquartile range. Fractional flow reserve was performed in one left main coronary artery; 37 left descending coronary arteries; 12 circumflex arteries and 4 right coronary arteries. Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was considered positive. The comparative analysis between the results of the tests was performed by two-tailed Fisher’s test and a p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was found in the left main coronary artery (100%); 13 in the left descending coronary artery (35.14%); 6 in circumflex artery (50%) and 2 in the right coronary artery (50%). Among the patients with positive fractional flow reserve, 83% had myocardial ischemia demonstrated by the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.058). When analyzing specifically the left descending coronary artery, 83% of the patients with negative fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, but 69% of the patients with positive fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.413). Conclusion: Disagreements can occur between the results of the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by invasive and noninvasive tests.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472018000400333
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472018000400333
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/2359-4802.20180021
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.31 n.4 2018
reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
collection International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br
_version_ 1754732625275125760