Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background The implementation of institutional protocols in the emergency department (ED) for risk stratification in patients with chest pain has been recommended. Objective To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of an institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method Cross-sectional study conducted based on the computerized records of patients treated with the use of a chest pain protocol adapted from the Manchester protocol. The level of risk was stratified by applying five colors representing the respective levels. Each color represents a level of severity and a maximum waiting time for receiving medical care. Red and orange were considered to be high priority, while patients with yellow, green or blue indications were considered to represent a low priority. To compare the type of diagnosis and the classification of priority for receiving care, the Pearson's chi-square test was used, considering a significance level of p< 0.05 for all tests. Results The records of 1,074 patients admitted to the cardiology ED were analyzed. Men (54%), with a mean age of 60 ± 15 years, with complaints of chest pain (44%) of moderate intensity (80%) were predominant the study. Of these patients, 19% were classified as high priority, while 81% were considered to represent a low priority. ACS was confirmed in 23% of the patients, with 34% of them being classified as high priority and 66% as low priority. The sensitivity of the risk stratification protocol for chest pain was 33.7% and the specificity was 86.0%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 41.7% and 81.3%, respectively. Conclusion The Institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of ACS presented satisfactory specificity and a low degree of sensitivity. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0 |
id |
SBC-2_b752d5e6b846a3fc6e423dd7da2fe9cb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2359-56472021000100067 |
network_acronym_str |
SBC-2 |
network_name_str |
International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary SyndromeChest PainAcute Coronary SyndromeRisk FactorsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecifityEmergency Medical ServicesAbstract Background The implementation of institutional protocols in the emergency department (ED) for risk stratification in patients with chest pain has been recommended. Objective To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of an institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method Cross-sectional study conducted based on the computerized records of patients treated with the use of a chest pain protocol adapted from the Manchester protocol. The level of risk was stratified by applying five colors representing the respective levels. Each color represents a level of severity and a maximum waiting time for receiving medical care. Red and orange were considered to be high priority, while patients with yellow, green or blue indications were considered to represent a low priority. To compare the type of diagnosis and the classification of priority for receiving care, the Pearson's chi-square test was used, considering a significance level of p< 0.05 for all tests. Results The records of 1,074 patients admitted to the cardiology ED were analyzed. Men (54%), with a mean age of 60 ± 15 years, with complaints of chest pain (44%) of moderate intensity (80%) were predominant the study. Of these patients, 19% were classified as high priority, while 81% were considered to represent a low priority. ACS was confirmed in 23% of the patients, with 34% of them being classified as high priority and 66% as low priority. The sensitivity of the risk stratification protocol for chest pain was 33.7% and the specificity was 86.0%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 41.7% and 81.3%, respectively. Conclusion The Institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of ACS presented satisfactory specificity and a low degree of sensitivity. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.34 n.1 2021reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.36660/ijcs.20190178info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReis,Ana Paula PazRuschel,Karen BrasilMoraes,Maria Antonieta P. deBelli,KarlyseSaffi,Marco LumertzFagundes,Jaqueline Eilerteng2022-02-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2359-56472021000100067Revistahttp://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/ijcshttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br2359-56472359-4802opendoar:2022-02-02T00:00International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome |
title |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome |
spellingShingle |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome Reis,Ana Paula Paz Chest Pain Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Factors Risk Assessment Sensitivity and Specifity Emergency Medical Services |
title_short |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome |
title_full |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome |
title_fullStr |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome |
title_sort |
Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome |
author |
Reis,Ana Paula Paz |
author_facet |
Reis,Ana Paula Paz Ruschel,Karen Brasil Moraes,Maria Antonieta P. de Belli,Karlyse Saffi,Marco Lumertz Fagundes,Jaqueline Eilert |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ruschel,Karen Brasil Moraes,Maria Antonieta P. de Belli,Karlyse Saffi,Marco Lumertz Fagundes,Jaqueline Eilert |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reis,Ana Paula Paz Ruschel,Karen Brasil Moraes,Maria Antonieta P. de Belli,Karlyse Saffi,Marco Lumertz Fagundes,Jaqueline Eilert |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chest Pain Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Factors Risk Assessment Sensitivity and Specifity Emergency Medical Services |
topic |
Chest Pain Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Factors Risk Assessment Sensitivity and Specifity Emergency Medical Services |
description |
Abstract Background The implementation of institutional protocols in the emergency department (ED) for risk stratification in patients with chest pain has been recommended. Objective To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of an institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method Cross-sectional study conducted based on the computerized records of patients treated with the use of a chest pain protocol adapted from the Manchester protocol. The level of risk was stratified by applying five colors representing the respective levels. Each color represents a level of severity and a maximum waiting time for receiving medical care. Red and orange were considered to be high priority, while patients with yellow, green or blue indications were considered to represent a low priority. To compare the type of diagnosis and the classification of priority for receiving care, the Pearson's chi-square test was used, considering a significance level of p< 0.05 for all tests. Results The records of 1,074 patients admitted to the cardiology ED were analyzed. Men (54%), with a mean age of 60 ± 15 years, with complaints of chest pain (44%) of moderate intensity (80%) were predominant the study. Of these patients, 19% were classified as high priority, while 81% were considered to represent a low priority. ACS was confirmed in 23% of the patients, with 34% of them being classified as high priority and 66% as low priority. The sensitivity of the risk stratification protocol for chest pain was 33.7% and the specificity was 86.0%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 41.7% and 81.3%, respectively. Conclusion The Institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of ACS presented satisfactory specificity and a low degree of sensitivity. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0 |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.36660/ijcs.20190178 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.34 n.1 2021 reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) instacron:SBC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
instacron_str |
SBC |
institution |
SBC |
reponame_str |
International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) |
collection |
International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br |
_version_ |
1754732626633031680 |