Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferrari,Gabriele
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Karlsson,Jan, Cao,Yang, Geijer,Håkan, Souza,Domingos, Samano,Ninos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000400430
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients primarily treated with a no-touch saphenous vein graft with that of patients who received a conventional graft. Methods: The study included all individuals treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on a saphenous vein graft (SVG) between January 2006 and June 2020. The RAND-36 health survey was used to assess HRQoL. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Effect size was estimated via Cohen’s d. The average treatment effect between the groups was tested by propensity score matching (PSM). Results: Of the 346 patients treated with a PCI in a stenosed or occluded SVG, 165 responded to RAND-36 (no-touch: n=48; conventional: n=117). Patients with a no-touch graft reported better mean values on seven of the eight health survey domains. Statistically significant differences were observed for four of the domains, all in favour of the no-touch group. The effect size estimates indicated a small difference for five domains, with the highest values (>0.40) seen for the general health and energy/fatigue domains. PSM confirmed a statistically significant difference for the physical functioning and general health domains. Conclusion: At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, patients who received a PCI in no-touch vein grafts showed significantly better HRQoL than those who received a PCI in conventional vein grafts.
id SBCCV-1_2e700feeadca870ef27814539ad465d3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382022000400430
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein GraftsCoronary Artery BypassQuality of LifePercutaneous Coronary InterventionSaphenous VeinFatiguePropensity Score.ABSTRACT Objective: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients primarily treated with a no-touch saphenous vein graft with that of patients who received a conventional graft. Methods: The study included all individuals treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on a saphenous vein graft (SVG) between January 2006 and June 2020. The RAND-36 health survey was used to assess HRQoL. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Effect size was estimated via Cohen’s d. The average treatment effect between the groups was tested by propensity score matching (PSM). Results: Of the 346 patients treated with a PCI in a stenosed or occluded SVG, 165 responded to RAND-36 (no-touch: n=48; conventional: n=117). Patients with a no-touch graft reported better mean values on seven of the eight health survey domains. Statistically significant differences were observed for four of the domains, all in favour of the no-touch group. The effect size estimates indicated a small difference for five domains, with the highest values (>0.40) seen for the general health and energy/fatigue domains. PSM confirmed a statistically significant difference for the physical functioning and general health domains. Conclusion: At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, patients who received a PCI in no-touch vein grafts showed significantly better HRQoL than those who received a PCI in conventional vein grafts.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000400430Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.37 n.4 2022reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0576info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerrari,GabrieleKarlsson,JanCao,YangGeijer,HåkanSouza,DomingosSamano,Ninoseng2022-08-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382022000400430Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2022-08-18T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
title Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
spellingShingle Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
Ferrari,Gabriele
Coronary Artery Bypass
Quality of Life
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Saphenous Vein
Fatigue
Propensity Score.
title_short Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
title_full Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
title_fullStr Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
title_sort Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts is Significantly Better Than in Conventional Vein Grafts
author Ferrari,Gabriele
author_facet Ferrari,Gabriele
Karlsson,Jan
Cao,Yang
Geijer,Håkan
Souza,Domingos
Samano,Ninos
author_role author
author2 Karlsson,Jan
Cao,Yang
Geijer,Håkan
Souza,Domingos
Samano,Ninos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferrari,Gabriele
Karlsson,Jan
Cao,Yang
Geijer,Håkan
Souza,Domingos
Samano,Ninos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coronary Artery Bypass
Quality of Life
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Saphenous Vein
Fatigue
Propensity Score.
topic Coronary Artery Bypass
Quality of Life
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Saphenous Vein
Fatigue
Propensity Score.
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients primarily treated with a no-touch saphenous vein graft with that of patients who received a conventional graft. Methods: The study included all individuals treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on a saphenous vein graft (SVG) between January 2006 and June 2020. The RAND-36 health survey was used to assess HRQoL. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Effect size was estimated via Cohen’s d. The average treatment effect between the groups was tested by propensity score matching (PSM). Results: Of the 346 patients treated with a PCI in a stenosed or occluded SVG, 165 responded to RAND-36 (no-touch: n=48; conventional: n=117). Patients with a no-touch graft reported better mean values on seven of the eight health survey domains. Statistically significant differences were observed for four of the domains, all in favour of the no-touch group. The effect size estimates indicated a small difference for five domains, with the highest values (>0.40) seen for the general health and energy/fatigue domains. PSM confirmed a statistically significant difference for the physical functioning and general health domains. Conclusion: At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, patients who received a PCI in no-touch vein grafts showed significantly better HRQoL than those who received a PCI in conventional vein grafts.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000400430
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000400430
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0576
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.37 n.4 2022
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126603481055232