Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382012000400022 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Most recent published meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) reduces incidence of stroke by 30% compared with on-pump CABG, but showed no difference in other outcomes. New RCTs were published, indicating need of new meta-analysis to investigate pooled results adding these further studies. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, SciELO, LILACS, Google Scholar and reference lists of relevant articles were searched for RCTs that compared outcomes (30-day mortality for all-cause, myocardial infarction or stroke) between off-pump versus on-pump CABG until May 2012. The principal summary measures were relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and P values (considered statistically significant when <0.05). The RR's were combined across studies using DerSimonian-Laird random effects weighted model. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were completed using the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, New Jersey, USA). RESULTS: Forty-seven RCTs were identified and included 13,524 patients (6,758 for off-pump and 6,766 for on-pump CABG). There was no significant difference between off-pump and on-pump CABG groups in RR for 30-day mortality or myocardial infarction, but there was difference about stroke in favor to off-pump CABG (RR 0.793, 95% CI 0.660-0.920, P=0.049). It was observed no important heterogeneity of effects about any outcome, but it was observed publication bias about outcome "stroke". Meta-regression did not demonstrate influence of female gender, number of grafts or age in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Off-pump CABG reduces the incidence of post-operative stroke by 20.7% and has no substantial effect on mortality or myocardial infarction in comparison to on-pump CABG. Patient gender, number of grafts performed and age do not seem to explain the effect of off-pump CABG on mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke, respectively. |
id |
SBCCV-1_3a166d5ffb496c74f2718f2fcf807a10 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-76382012000400022 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCCV-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trialsMeta-AnalysisCoronary artery bypass, off-pumpCardiopulmonary bypassBACKGROUND: Most recent published meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) reduces incidence of stroke by 30% compared with on-pump CABG, but showed no difference in other outcomes. New RCTs were published, indicating need of new meta-analysis to investigate pooled results adding these further studies. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, SciELO, LILACS, Google Scholar and reference lists of relevant articles were searched for RCTs that compared outcomes (30-day mortality for all-cause, myocardial infarction or stroke) between off-pump versus on-pump CABG until May 2012. The principal summary measures were relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and P values (considered statistically significant when <0.05). The RR's were combined across studies using DerSimonian-Laird random effects weighted model. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were completed using the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, New Jersey, USA). RESULTS: Forty-seven RCTs were identified and included 13,524 patients (6,758 for off-pump and 6,766 for on-pump CABG). There was no significant difference between off-pump and on-pump CABG groups in RR for 30-day mortality or myocardial infarction, but there was difference about stroke in favor to off-pump CABG (RR 0.793, 95% CI 0.660-0.920, P=0.049). It was observed no important heterogeneity of effects about any outcome, but it was observed publication bias about outcome "stroke". Meta-regression did not demonstrate influence of female gender, number of grafts or age in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Off-pump CABG reduces the incidence of post-operative stroke by 20.7% and has no substantial effect on mortality or myocardial infarction in comparison to on-pump CABG. Patient gender, number of grafts performed and age do not seem to explain the effect of off-pump CABG on mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke, respectively.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382012000400022Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.27 n.4 2012reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.5935/1678-9741.20120106info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSá,Michel Pompeu Barros de OliveiraFerraz,Paulo ErnandoEscobar,Rodrigo RendaMartins,Wendell NunesLustosa,Pablo CésarNunes,Eliobas de OliveiraVasconcelos,Frederico PiresLima,Ricardo Carvalhoeng2013-03-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382012000400022Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2013-03-13T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials |
title |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials |
spellingShingle |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials Sá,Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Meta-Analysis Coronary artery bypass, off-pump Cardiopulmonary bypass |
title_short |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials |
title_full |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials |
title_fullStr |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials |
title_sort |
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 13,524 patients from randomized trials |
author |
Sá,Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Sá,Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Ferraz,Paulo Ernando Escobar,Rodrigo Renda Martins,Wendell Nunes Lustosa,Pablo César Nunes,Eliobas de Oliveira Vasconcelos,Frederico Pires Lima,Ricardo Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferraz,Paulo Ernando Escobar,Rodrigo Renda Martins,Wendell Nunes Lustosa,Pablo César Nunes,Eliobas de Oliveira Vasconcelos,Frederico Pires Lima,Ricardo Carvalho |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sá,Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Ferraz,Paulo Ernando Escobar,Rodrigo Renda Martins,Wendell Nunes Lustosa,Pablo César Nunes,Eliobas de Oliveira Vasconcelos,Frederico Pires Lima,Ricardo Carvalho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Meta-Analysis Coronary artery bypass, off-pump Cardiopulmonary bypass |
topic |
Meta-Analysis Coronary artery bypass, off-pump Cardiopulmonary bypass |
description |
BACKGROUND: Most recent published meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) reduces incidence of stroke by 30% compared with on-pump CABG, but showed no difference in other outcomes. New RCTs were published, indicating need of new meta-analysis to investigate pooled results adding these further studies. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, SciELO, LILACS, Google Scholar and reference lists of relevant articles were searched for RCTs that compared outcomes (30-day mortality for all-cause, myocardial infarction or stroke) between off-pump versus on-pump CABG until May 2012. The principal summary measures were relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and P values (considered statistically significant when <0.05). The RR's were combined across studies using DerSimonian-Laird random effects weighted model. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were completed using the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, New Jersey, USA). RESULTS: Forty-seven RCTs were identified and included 13,524 patients (6,758 for off-pump and 6,766 for on-pump CABG). There was no significant difference between off-pump and on-pump CABG groups in RR for 30-day mortality or myocardial infarction, but there was difference about stroke in favor to off-pump CABG (RR 0.793, 95% CI 0.660-0.920, P=0.049). It was observed no important heterogeneity of effects about any outcome, but it was observed publication bias about outcome "stroke". Meta-regression did not demonstrate influence of female gender, number of grafts or age in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Off-pump CABG reduces the incidence of post-operative stroke by 20.7% and has no substantial effect on mortality or myocardial infarction in comparison to on-pump CABG. Patient gender, number of grafts performed and age do not seem to explain the effect of off-pump CABG on mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke, respectively. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382012000400022 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382012000400022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/1678-9741.20120106 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.27 n.4 2012 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) instacron:SBCCV |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
instacron_str |
SBCCV |
institution |
SBCCV |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126598062014464 |