Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira,Renata Tosoni Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Silva,Roberto Rocha e, Marchi,Evaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000600422
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To compare the results of aortic valve replacement with access by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of 37 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach, with emphasis on the comparison of time of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping, volume of surgical bleeding, time of mechanical ventilation, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge, short-term mortality and presence of surgical wound infection. Results: Sternotomy was used in 22 patients and minimally invasive surgery in 15 patients. The minimally invasive approach had significantly higher time values of cardiopulmonary bypass (114.3±23.9 versus 86.7±19.8min.; P=0.003), aortic clamping (87.4±19.2 versus 61.4±12.9 min.; P<0.001) and mechanical ventilation (287.3±138.9 versus 153.9±118.6 min.; P=0.003). No difference was found in outcomes surgical bleeding volume, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit and time of hospital discharge. No cases of short-term mortality or surgical wound infection were documented. Conclusion: The less invasive approach presented with longer times of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamping and mechanical ventilation than sternotomy, however without prejudice to the length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge and morbidity.
id SBCCV-1_3b4c8dd76f818b5f3262ce4ef9c938f4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382016000600422
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive ApproachAortic Valve/SurgeryAortic Valve StenosisCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresSternotomyCardiopulmonary BypassHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAbstract Objective: To compare the results of aortic valve replacement with access by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of 37 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach, with emphasis on the comparison of time of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping, volume of surgical bleeding, time of mechanical ventilation, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge, short-term mortality and presence of surgical wound infection. Results: Sternotomy was used in 22 patients and minimally invasive surgery in 15 patients. The minimally invasive approach had significantly higher time values of cardiopulmonary bypass (114.3±23.9 versus 86.7±19.8min.; P=0.003), aortic clamping (87.4±19.2 versus 61.4±12.9 min.; P<0.001) and mechanical ventilation (287.3±138.9 versus 153.9±118.6 min.; P=0.003). No difference was found in outcomes surgical bleeding volume, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit and time of hospital discharge. No cases of short-term mortality or surgical wound infection were documented. Conclusion: The less invasive approach presented with longer times of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamping and mechanical ventilation than sternotomy, however without prejudice to the length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge and morbidity.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000600422Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.31 n.6 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.5935/1678-9741.20160085info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Renata Tosoni RodriguesSilva,Roberto Rocha eMarchi,Evaldoeng2017-01-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382016000600422Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2017-01-05T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
title Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
spellingShingle Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
Ferreira,Renata Tosoni Rodrigues
Aortic Valve/Surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
Sternotomy
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
title_short Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
title_full Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
title_fullStr Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
title_full_unstemmed Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
title_sort Aortic Valve Replacement: Treatment by Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Approach
author Ferreira,Renata Tosoni Rodrigues
author_facet Ferreira,Renata Tosoni Rodrigues
Silva,Roberto Rocha e
Marchi,Evaldo
author_role author
author2 Silva,Roberto Rocha e
Marchi,Evaldo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira,Renata Tosoni Rodrigues
Silva,Roberto Rocha e
Marchi,Evaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aortic Valve/Surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
Sternotomy
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
topic Aortic Valve/Surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
Sternotomy
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
description Abstract Objective: To compare the results of aortic valve replacement with access by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of 37 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by sternotomy or minimally invasive approach, with emphasis on the comparison of time of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping, volume of surgical bleeding, time of mechanical ventilation, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge, short-term mortality and presence of surgical wound infection. Results: Sternotomy was used in 22 patients and minimally invasive surgery in 15 patients. The minimally invasive approach had significantly higher time values of cardiopulmonary bypass (114.3±23.9 versus 86.7±19.8min.; P=0.003), aortic clamping (87.4±19.2 versus 61.4±12.9 min.; P<0.001) and mechanical ventilation (287.3±138.9 versus 153.9±118.6 min.; P=0.003). No difference was found in outcomes surgical bleeding volume, need for blood transfusion, incidence of atrial fibrillation, length of stay in intensive care unit and time of hospital discharge. No cases of short-term mortality or surgical wound infection were documented. Conclusion: The less invasive approach presented with longer times of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamping and mechanical ventilation than sternotomy, however without prejudice to the length of stay in intensive care unit, time of hospital discharge and morbidity.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000600422
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000600422
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1678-9741.20160085
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.31 n.6 2016
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126599444037632