Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000500648 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Introduction: There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. Methods: Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. Results: In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). Conclusion: Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34th month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter. |
id |
SBCCV-1_4026a691db2cf83abf04d96031f37328 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-76382022000500648 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCCV-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What HappenedCoronary Artery BypassCarotid EndarterectomyCarotid ArteriesTransient Ischemic AttackProgression-Free SurvivalMyocardial InfarctationStrokeABSTRACT Introduction: There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. Methods: Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. Results: In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). Conclusion: Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34th month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000500648Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.37 n.5 2022reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGüney,Mehmet RaşitGüler,ErhanAlbay,ErkanKehlibar,TamerYilmaz,MehmetKetenci,Bülendeng2022-11-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382022000500648Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2022-11-10T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
title |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
spellingShingle |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened Güney,Mehmet Raşit Coronary Artery Bypass Carotid Endarterectomy Carotid Arteries Transient Ischemic Attack Progression-Free Survival Myocardial Infarctation Stroke |
title_short |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
title_full |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
title_fullStr |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
title_sort |
Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease: What We Did, What Happened |
author |
Güney,Mehmet Raşit |
author_facet |
Güney,Mehmet Raşit Güler,Erhan Albay,Erkan Kehlibar,Tamer Yilmaz,Mehmet Ketenci,Bülend |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Güler,Erhan Albay,Erkan Kehlibar,Tamer Yilmaz,Mehmet Ketenci,Bülend |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Güney,Mehmet Raşit Güler,Erhan Albay,Erkan Kehlibar,Tamer Yilmaz,Mehmet Ketenci,Bülend |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Coronary Artery Bypass Carotid Endarterectomy Carotid Arteries Transient Ischemic Attack Progression-Free Survival Myocardial Infarctation Stroke |
topic |
Coronary Artery Bypass Carotid Endarterectomy Carotid Arteries Transient Ischemic Attack Progression-Free Survival Myocardial Infarctation Stroke |
description |
ABSTRACT Introduction: There is no complete consensus on the three surgical methods and long-term consequences for coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical results in this high-risk group in our clinic for a decade. Methods: Between 2005 and 2015, 196 patients were treated for combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A total of 50 patients were operated on with the staged method, 40 of which had carotid endarterectomy (CEA) priority, and 10 had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) priority. CABG and CEA were simultaneously performed in 82 patients; and in 64 asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid artery lesions and stenosis over 70%, only CABG was done (64 patients). Results were evaluated by uni-/multivariate analyses for perioperative, early, and late postoperative data. Results: In the staged group, interval between the operations was 2.82±0.74 months. Perioperative and early postoperative (30 days) parameters did not differ between groups (P-value < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up time was averaged 94.9±38.3 months. Postoperative events were examined in three groups as (A) deaths (all cause), (B) cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent angina, congestive heart failure, palpitation), and (C) fatal neurological events (amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, and stroke). When group C events were excluded, event-free actuarial survival rates were similar in all three methods (P=0.740). Actuarial survival rate was significantly different when all events were included (P=0.027). Neurological events increased markedly between months 34 and 66 (P=0.004). Conclusion: Perioperative and early postoperative event-free survival rates were similar in all three methods. By the beginning of the 34th month, the only CABG group has been negatively separated due to neurological events. In the choice of methodology, “most threatened organ priority’’ was considered as clinical parameter. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000500648 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000500648 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0127 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.37 n.5 2022 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) instacron:SBCCV |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
instacron_str |
SBCCV |
institution |
SBCCV |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126603870076928 |