Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022 |
Resumo: | Abstract Introduction: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become the standard of care due to a lower 30-day mortality, a lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay and a quicker recovery. The role of open repair (OR) and to whom this type of operation should be offered is subject to discussion. Objective: To present a single center experience on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparing the results of open and endovascular repairs. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 286 patients submitted to OR and 91 patients submitted to EVAR. The mean follow-up for the OR group was 66 months and for the EVAR group was 39 months. Results: The overall mortality was 11.89% for OR and 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647. It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versusEVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P<0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hoursversus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours,P<0.003). The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versusEVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk. In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse events, should be selected, aiming at the long term durability of the procedure. |
id |
SBCCV-1_44f45746ca9e03e4edd7ca8815a6f6de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-76382016000100022 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCCV-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS ScorePostoperative complicationsSurgical Procedures, OperativeAortic aneurysm, abdominalEndovascular ProceduresAbstract Introduction: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become the standard of care due to a lower 30-day mortality, a lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay and a quicker recovery. The role of open repair (OR) and to whom this type of operation should be offered is subject to discussion. Objective: To present a single center experience on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparing the results of open and endovascular repairs. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 286 patients submitted to OR and 91 patients submitted to EVAR. The mean follow-up for the OR group was 66 months and for the EVAR group was 39 months. Results: The overall mortality was 11.89% for OR and 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647. It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versusEVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P<0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hoursversus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours,P<0.003). The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versusEVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk. In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse events, should be selected, aiming at the long term durability of the procedure.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.31 n.1 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.5935/1678-9741.20160006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMenezes,Fábio HüsemannFerrarezi,BárbaraSouza,Moisés Amâncio deCosme,Susyanne LavorMolinari,Giovani José Dal Poggettoeng2016-04-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382016000100022Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2016-04-04T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score |
title |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score |
spellingShingle |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann Postoperative complications Surgical Procedures, Operative Aortic aneurysm, abdominal Endovascular Procedures |
title_short |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score |
title_full |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score |
title_fullStr |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score |
title_full_unstemmed |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score |
title_sort |
Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score |
author |
Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann |
author_facet |
Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann Ferrarezi,Bárbara Souza,Moisés Amâncio de Cosme,Susyanne Lavor Molinari,Giovani José Dal Poggetto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferrarezi,Bárbara Souza,Moisés Amâncio de Cosme,Susyanne Lavor Molinari,Giovani José Dal Poggetto |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann Ferrarezi,Bárbara Souza,Moisés Amâncio de Cosme,Susyanne Lavor Molinari,Giovani José Dal Poggetto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Postoperative complications Surgical Procedures, Operative Aortic aneurysm, abdominal Endovascular Procedures |
topic |
Postoperative complications Surgical Procedures, Operative Aortic aneurysm, abdominal Endovascular Procedures |
description |
Abstract Introduction: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become the standard of care due to a lower 30-day mortality, a lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay and a quicker recovery. The role of open repair (OR) and to whom this type of operation should be offered is subject to discussion. Objective: To present a single center experience on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparing the results of open and endovascular repairs. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 286 patients submitted to OR and 91 patients submitted to EVAR. The mean follow-up for the OR group was 66 months and for the EVAR group was 39 months. Results: The overall mortality was 11.89% for OR and 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647. It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versusEVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P<0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hoursversus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours,P<0.003). The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versusEVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk. In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse events, should be selected, aiming at the long term durability of the procedure. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/1678-9741.20160006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.31 n.1 2016 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) instacron:SBCCV |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
instacron_str |
SBCCV |
institution |
SBCCV |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126599327645696 |