Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Ferrarezi,Bárbara, Souza,Moisés Amâncio de, Cosme,Susyanne Lavor, Molinari,Giovani José Dal Poggetto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become the standard of care due to a lower 30-day mortality, a lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay and a quicker recovery. The role of open repair (OR) and to whom this type of operation should be offered is subject to discussion. Objective: To present a single center experience on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparing the results of open and endovascular repairs. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 286 patients submitted to OR and 91 patients submitted to EVAR. The mean follow-up for the OR group was 66 months and for the EVAR group was 39 months. Results: The overall mortality was 11.89% for OR and 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647. It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versusEVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P<0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hoursversus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours,P<0.003). The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versusEVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk. In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse events, should be selected, aiming at the long term durability of the procedure.
id SBCCV-1_44f45746ca9e03e4edd7ca8815a6f6de
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382016000100022
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS ScorePostoperative complicationsSurgical Procedures, OperativeAortic aneurysm, abdominalEndovascular ProceduresAbstract Introduction: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become the standard of care due to a lower 30-day mortality, a lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay and a quicker recovery. The role of open repair (OR) and to whom this type of operation should be offered is subject to discussion. Objective: To present a single center experience on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparing the results of open and endovascular repairs. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 286 patients submitted to OR and 91 patients submitted to EVAR. The mean follow-up for the OR group was 66 months and for the EVAR group was 39 months. Results: The overall mortality was 11.89% for OR and 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647. It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versusEVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P<0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hoursversus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours,P<0.003). The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versusEVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk. In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse events, should be selected, aiming at the long term durability of the procedure.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.31 n.1 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.5935/1678-9741.20160006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMenezes,Fábio HüsemannFerrarezi,BárbaraSouza,Moisés Amâncio deCosme,Susyanne LavorMolinari,Giovani José Dal Poggettoeng2016-04-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382016000100022Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2016-04-04T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
title Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
spellingShingle Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann
Postoperative complications
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Aortic aneurysm, abdominal
Endovascular Procedures
title_short Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
title_full Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
title_fullStr Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
title_full_unstemmed Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
title_sort Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score
author Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann
author_facet Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann
Ferrarezi,Bárbara
Souza,Moisés Amâncio de
Cosme,Susyanne Lavor
Molinari,Giovani José Dal Poggetto
author_role author
author2 Ferrarezi,Bárbara
Souza,Moisés Amâncio de
Cosme,Susyanne Lavor
Molinari,Giovani José Dal Poggetto
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Menezes,Fábio Hüsemann
Ferrarezi,Bárbara
Souza,Moisés Amâncio de
Cosme,Susyanne Lavor
Molinari,Giovani José Dal Poggetto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Postoperative complications
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Aortic aneurysm, abdominal
Endovascular Procedures
topic Postoperative complications
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Aortic aneurysm, abdominal
Endovascular Procedures
description Abstract Introduction: Endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become the standard of care due to a lower 30-day mortality, a lower morbidity, shorter hospital stay and a quicker recovery. The role of open repair (OR) and to whom this type of operation should be offered is subject to discussion. Objective: To present a single center experience on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, comparing the results of open and endovascular repairs. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 286 patients submitted to OR and 91 patients submitted to EVAR. The mean follow-up for the OR group was 66 months and for the EVAR group was 39 months. Results: The overall mortality was 11.89% for OR and 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647. It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versusEVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P<0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hoursversus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours,P<0.003). The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versusEVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk. In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse events, should be selected, aiming at the long term durability of the procedure.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000100022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1678-9741.20160006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.31 n.1 2016
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126599327645696