Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima,Neiberg de Alcantara
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cunha,Gisele Schinaider, Menezes,Natalia Soares de, Silva Junior,Evilásio Leobino da, Lima,Carol Cavalcante de Vasconcelos, Sampaio,Stela Maria Vitorino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400014
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Indications for cardiac devices have been increasing as well as the need for lead extractions as a result of infections, failed leads and device recalls. Powered laser sheaths, with a global trend towards the in-creasingly technological tools, meant to improve the procedure’s outcome but have economic implications. Objective: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the experience of a Bra-zilian center that uses simple manual traction in most lead removals per-formed annually, questioning the real need for expensive and technically challenging new devices. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 35 patients who had a transvenous lead extraction in the period of a year between January 1998 and October 2014 at Hospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes, in Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. Data were collected through a records review. They were evaluated based on age, type of device, dwelling time, indication for removal, technique used and immediate outcomes. Results: The median dwelling time of the devices was 46.22 months. Infec-tion, lead fracture and device malfunction were the most common indica-tions. Simple traction was the method of choice, used in 88.9% of the pro-cedures. Manual traction presented high success rates, resulting in com-plete removal without complications in 90% of the cases. Conclusion: This article suggests that lead extraction by simple manual traction can still be performed effectively in countries with economic diffi-culties as a first attempt, leaving auxiliary tools for a second attempt in case of failure or contraindications to the simple manual traction technique.
id SBCCV-1_9bf4ecc87586e434e3a60f7e89381aed
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382019000400014
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center ExperiencePacemaker, ArtificialLasersTractionRetrospective StudiesAbstract Introduction: Indications for cardiac devices have been increasing as well as the need for lead extractions as a result of infections, failed leads and device recalls. Powered laser sheaths, with a global trend towards the in-creasingly technological tools, meant to improve the procedure’s outcome but have economic implications. Objective: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the experience of a Bra-zilian center that uses simple manual traction in most lead removals per-formed annually, questioning the real need for expensive and technically challenging new devices. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 35 patients who had a transvenous lead extraction in the period of a year between January 1998 and October 2014 at Hospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes, in Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. Data were collected through a records review. They were evaluated based on age, type of device, dwelling time, indication for removal, technique used and immediate outcomes. Results: The median dwelling time of the devices was 46.22 months. Infec-tion, lead fracture and device malfunction were the most common indica-tions. Simple traction was the method of choice, used in 88.9% of the pro-cedures. Manual traction presented high success rates, resulting in com-plete removal without complications in 90% of the cases. Conclusion: This article suggests that lead extraction by simple manual traction can still be performed effectively in countries with economic diffi-culties as a first attempt, leaving auxiliary tools for a second attempt in case of failure or contraindications to the simple manual traction technique.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400014Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.34 n.4 2019reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0275info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,Neiberg de AlcantaraCunha,Gisele SchinaiderMenezes,Natalia Soares deSilva Junior,Evilásio Leobino daLima,Carol Cavalcante de VasconcelosSampaio,Stela Maria Vitorinoeng2019-11-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382019000400014Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2019-11-28T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
title Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
spellingShingle Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
Lima,Neiberg de Alcantara
Pacemaker, Artificial
Lasers
Traction
Retrospective Studies
title_short Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort Lead Removal Without Extraction Tools: A Single-Center Experience
author Lima,Neiberg de Alcantara
author_facet Lima,Neiberg de Alcantara
Cunha,Gisele Schinaider
Menezes,Natalia Soares de
Silva Junior,Evilásio Leobino da
Lima,Carol Cavalcante de Vasconcelos
Sampaio,Stela Maria Vitorino
author_role author
author2 Cunha,Gisele Schinaider
Menezes,Natalia Soares de
Silva Junior,Evilásio Leobino da
Lima,Carol Cavalcante de Vasconcelos
Sampaio,Stela Maria Vitorino
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima,Neiberg de Alcantara
Cunha,Gisele Schinaider
Menezes,Natalia Soares de
Silva Junior,Evilásio Leobino da
Lima,Carol Cavalcante de Vasconcelos
Sampaio,Stela Maria Vitorino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pacemaker, Artificial
Lasers
Traction
Retrospective Studies
topic Pacemaker, Artificial
Lasers
Traction
Retrospective Studies
description Abstract Introduction: Indications for cardiac devices have been increasing as well as the need for lead extractions as a result of infections, failed leads and device recalls. Powered laser sheaths, with a global trend towards the in-creasingly technological tools, meant to improve the procedure’s outcome but have economic implications. Objective: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the experience of a Bra-zilian center that uses simple manual traction in most lead removals per-formed annually, questioning the real need for expensive and technically challenging new devices. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 35 patients who had a transvenous lead extraction in the period of a year between January 1998 and October 2014 at Hospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes, in Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. Data were collected through a records review. They were evaluated based on age, type of device, dwelling time, indication for removal, technique used and immediate outcomes. Results: The median dwelling time of the devices was 46.22 months. Infec-tion, lead fracture and device malfunction were the most common indica-tions. Simple traction was the method of choice, used in 88.9% of the pro-cedures. Manual traction presented high success rates, resulting in com-plete removal without complications in 90% of the cases. Conclusion: This article suggests that lead extraction by simple manual traction can still be performed effectively in countries with economic diffi-culties as a first attempt, leaving auxiliary tools for a second attempt in case of failure or contraindications to the simple manual traction technique.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0275
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.34 n.4 2019
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126600691843072