Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arafat,Amr A.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Zahra,Ashraf I., Alhossan,Abdulaziz, Alghosoon,Haneen, Alotaiby,Mohammad, Albabtain,Monirah A., Adam,Adam I., Algarni,Khaled D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022005007203
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Repeat transcatheter mitral valve replacement (rTMVR) has emerged as a new option for the management of high-risk patients unsuitable for repeat surgical mitral valve replacement (rSMVR). The aim of this study was to compare hospital outcomes, survival, and reoperations after rTMVR versus surgical mitral valve replacement. Methods: We compared patients who underwent rTMVR (n=22) from 2017 to 2019 (Group 1) to patients who underwent rSMVR (n=98) with or without tricuspid valve surgery from 2009 to 2019 (Group 2). We excluded patients who underwent a concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement or other concomitant surgery. Results: Patients in Group 1 were significantly older (72.5 [67-78] vs. 57 [52-64] years, P<0.001). There was no diference in EuroSCORE II between groups (6.56 [5.47-8.04] vs. 6.74 [4.28-11.84], P=0.86). Implanted valve size was 26 (26-29) mm in Group 1 and 25 (25-27) mm in Group 2 (P=0.106). There was no diference in operative mortality between groups (P=0.46). However, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were shorter in Group 1 (P=0.03 and <0.001, respectively). NYHA class improved significantly in both groups at one year (P<0.001 for both groups). There was no group effect on survival (P=0.84) or cardiac readmission (P=0.26). However, reoperations were more frequent in Group 1 (P=0.01). Conclusion: Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve could shorten ICU and hospital stay compared to rSMVR with a comparable mortality rate. rTMVR is a safe procedure; however, it has a higher risk of reoperation. rTMVR can be an option in selected high-risk patients.
id SBCCV-1_e168b16c69055a2b8203eb375e445984
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382022005007203
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve ReplacementTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementMitral ValveSurvivalIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayABSTRACT Introduction: Repeat transcatheter mitral valve replacement (rTMVR) has emerged as a new option for the management of high-risk patients unsuitable for repeat surgical mitral valve replacement (rSMVR). The aim of this study was to compare hospital outcomes, survival, and reoperations after rTMVR versus surgical mitral valve replacement. Methods: We compared patients who underwent rTMVR (n=22) from 2017 to 2019 (Group 1) to patients who underwent rSMVR (n=98) with or without tricuspid valve surgery from 2009 to 2019 (Group 2). We excluded patients who underwent a concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement or other concomitant surgery. Results: Patients in Group 1 were significantly older (72.5 [67-78] vs. 57 [52-64] years, P<0.001). There was no diference in EuroSCORE II between groups (6.56 [5.47-8.04] vs. 6.74 [4.28-11.84], P=0.86). Implanted valve size was 26 (26-29) mm in Group 1 and 25 (25-27) mm in Group 2 (P=0.106). There was no diference in operative mortality between groups (P=0.46). However, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were shorter in Group 1 (P=0.03 and <0.001, respectively). NYHA class improved significantly in both groups at one year (P<0.001 for both groups). There was no group effect on survival (P=0.84) or cardiac readmission (P=0.26). However, reoperations were more frequent in Group 1 (P=0.01). Conclusion: Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve could shorten ICU and hospital stay compared to rSMVR with a comparable mortality rate. rTMVR is a safe procedure; however, it has a higher risk of reoperation. rTMVR can be an option in selected high-risk patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022005007203Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery n.ahead 2022reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0341info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArafat,Amr A.Zahra,Ashraf I.Alhossan,AbdulazizAlghosoon,HaneenAlotaiby,MohammadAlbabtain,Monirah A.Adam,Adam I.Algarni,Khaled D.eng2022-09-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382022005007203Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2022-09-15T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
title Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
spellingShingle Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
Arafat,Amr A.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Mitral Valve
Survival
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
title_short Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
title_full Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
title_fullStr Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
title_sort Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Repeat Mitral Valve Replacement
author Arafat,Amr A.
author_facet Arafat,Amr A.
Zahra,Ashraf I.
Alhossan,Abdulaziz
Alghosoon,Haneen
Alotaiby,Mohammad
Albabtain,Monirah A.
Adam,Adam I.
Algarni,Khaled D.
author_role author
author2 Zahra,Ashraf I.
Alhossan,Abdulaziz
Alghosoon,Haneen
Alotaiby,Mohammad
Albabtain,Monirah A.
Adam,Adam I.
Algarni,Khaled D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arafat,Amr A.
Zahra,Ashraf I.
Alhossan,Abdulaziz
Alghosoon,Haneen
Alotaiby,Mohammad
Albabtain,Monirah A.
Adam,Adam I.
Algarni,Khaled D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Mitral Valve
Survival
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
topic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Mitral Valve
Survival
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Repeat transcatheter mitral valve replacement (rTMVR) has emerged as a new option for the management of high-risk patients unsuitable for repeat surgical mitral valve replacement (rSMVR). The aim of this study was to compare hospital outcomes, survival, and reoperations after rTMVR versus surgical mitral valve replacement. Methods: We compared patients who underwent rTMVR (n=22) from 2017 to 2019 (Group 1) to patients who underwent rSMVR (n=98) with or without tricuspid valve surgery from 2009 to 2019 (Group 2). We excluded patients who underwent a concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement or other concomitant surgery. Results: Patients in Group 1 were significantly older (72.5 [67-78] vs. 57 [52-64] years, P<0.001). There was no diference in EuroSCORE II between groups (6.56 [5.47-8.04] vs. 6.74 [4.28-11.84], P=0.86). Implanted valve size was 26 (26-29) mm in Group 1 and 25 (25-27) mm in Group 2 (P=0.106). There was no diference in operative mortality between groups (P=0.46). However, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were shorter in Group 1 (P=0.03 and <0.001, respectively). NYHA class improved significantly in both groups at one year (P<0.001 for both groups). There was no group effect on survival (P=0.84) or cardiac readmission (P=0.26). However, reoperations were more frequent in Group 1 (P=0.01). Conclusion: Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve could shorten ICU and hospital stay compared to rSMVR with a comparable mortality rate. rTMVR is a safe procedure; however, it has a higher risk of reoperation. rTMVR can be an option in selected high-risk patients.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022005007203
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022005007203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0341
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery n.ahead 2022
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126603964448768