A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yuanfeng,Xin
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Kaitao,Jian, Mahmood,Safwa, Jianshi,Liu, Lizhong,Sun, Yaping,He, Wei,Liu
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000300343
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: At present, there are few reports regarding the issue of aortic reoperation due to its complexity and high risk and individual differences among patients. Methods: From November 2016 to December 2017, the data from 35 cases of aortic reoperation at our institution, out of 212 consecutive aortic repairs, were reviewed. We retrospectively summarized and analyzed their surgical indications, operative data, time interval from previous aortic repair, and outcomes. The time intervals until reoperation were analyzed for differences. Results: Patients’ mean age was 40.9±14.5 years, and 25 of them were men (71.4%). The indications for reoperation were aortic valvular problem (14.3%), aneurysmal dilatation (25.7%), pseudoaneurysm formation due to anastomotic leakage (43.2%), and aortic dissection (17.1%). For patients who had underwent primarily emergency operations due to aortic dissection, the time interval until reoperation (4.8±3.2 years) was significantly shorter than that of the whole group (5.5±3.6 years, P<0.01). Among the 35 reoperations, Sun’s procedure was selected for 16 patients (45.7%) with total aortic arch reconstruction. The average follow-up was 12 months (range 9-15 months). Hospital mortality was 5.7% (two patients). Among the hospital survivors there were no cases of death, rupture of residual dissection, paraplegia, or central nervous system complications during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Patients with acute aortic dissection required repeat surgery significantly earlier compared to other diseases. As to reoperation strategy, we recommend Sun’s procedure as the choice for extended arch reconstruction since minimal effect on overall mortality and complication rates were found.
id SBCCV-1_ee2a4aa1e9dab5d37f79ac5f23113d44
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382022000300343
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic ReoperationReoperationAneurysmAortic DissectionAortaVascular Surgical ProceduresHospital MortalityAbstract Introduction: At present, there are few reports regarding the issue of aortic reoperation due to its complexity and high risk and individual differences among patients. Methods: From November 2016 to December 2017, the data from 35 cases of aortic reoperation at our institution, out of 212 consecutive aortic repairs, were reviewed. We retrospectively summarized and analyzed their surgical indications, operative data, time interval from previous aortic repair, and outcomes. The time intervals until reoperation were analyzed for differences. Results: Patients’ mean age was 40.9±14.5 years, and 25 of them were men (71.4%). The indications for reoperation were aortic valvular problem (14.3%), aneurysmal dilatation (25.7%), pseudoaneurysm formation due to anastomotic leakage (43.2%), and aortic dissection (17.1%). For patients who had underwent primarily emergency operations due to aortic dissection, the time interval until reoperation (4.8±3.2 years) was significantly shorter than that of the whole group (5.5±3.6 years, P<0.01). Among the 35 reoperations, Sun’s procedure was selected for 16 patients (45.7%) with total aortic arch reconstruction. The average follow-up was 12 months (range 9-15 months). Hospital mortality was 5.7% (two patients). Among the hospital survivors there were no cases of death, rupture of residual dissection, paraplegia, or central nervous system complications during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Patients with acute aortic dissection required repeat surgery significantly earlier compared to other diseases. As to reoperation strategy, we recommend Sun’s procedure as the choice for extended arch reconstruction since minimal effect on overall mortality and complication rates were found.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000300343Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.37 n.3 2022reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0287info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYuanfeng,XinKaitao,JianMahmood,SafwaJianshi,LiuLizhong,SunYaping,HeWei,Liueng2022-05-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382022000300343Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2022-05-31T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
title A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
spellingShingle A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
Yuanfeng,Xin
Reoperation
Aneurysm
Aortic Dissection
Aorta
Vascular Surgical Procedures
Hospital Mortality
title_short A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
title_full A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
title_fullStr A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
title_full_unstemmed A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
title_sort A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
author Yuanfeng,Xin
author_facet Yuanfeng,Xin
Kaitao,Jian
Mahmood,Safwa
Jianshi,Liu
Lizhong,Sun
Yaping,He
Wei,Liu
author_role author
author2 Kaitao,Jian
Mahmood,Safwa
Jianshi,Liu
Lizhong,Sun
Yaping,He
Wei,Liu
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yuanfeng,Xin
Kaitao,Jian
Mahmood,Safwa
Jianshi,Liu
Lizhong,Sun
Yaping,He
Wei,Liu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reoperation
Aneurysm
Aortic Dissection
Aorta
Vascular Surgical Procedures
Hospital Mortality
topic Reoperation
Aneurysm
Aortic Dissection
Aorta
Vascular Surgical Procedures
Hospital Mortality
description Abstract Introduction: At present, there are few reports regarding the issue of aortic reoperation due to its complexity and high risk and individual differences among patients. Methods: From November 2016 to December 2017, the data from 35 cases of aortic reoperation at our institution, out of 212 consecutive aortic repairs, were reviewed. We retrospectively summarized and analyzed their surgical indications, operative data, time interval from previous aortic repair, and outcomes. The time intervals until reoperation were analyzed for differences. Results: Patients’ mean age was 40.9±14.5 years, and 25 of them were men (71.4%). The indications for reoperation were aortic valvular problem (14.3%), aneurysmal dilatation (25.7%), pseudoaneurysm formation due to anastomotic leakage (43.2%), and aortic dissection (17.1%). For patients who had underwent primarily emergency operations due to aortic dissection, the time interval until reoperation (4.8±3.2 years) was significantly shorter than that of the whole group (5.5±3.6 years, P<0.01). Among the 35 reoperations, Sun’s procedure was selected for 16 patients (45.7%) with total aortic arch reconstruction. The average follow-up was 12 months (range 9-15 months). Hospital mortality was 5.7% (two patients). Among the hospital survivors there were no cases of death, rupture of residual dissection, paraplegia, or central nervous system complications during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Patients with acute aortic dissection required repeat surgery significantly earlier compared to other diseases. As to reoperation strategy, we recommend Sun’s procedure as the choice for extended arch reconstruction since minimal effect on overall mortality and complication rates were found.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000300343
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000300343
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0287
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.37 n.3 2022
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126603194793984