Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To verify the concurrent validity between the inspiratory muscle strength (IMS) values obtained in static (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]) and dynamic (S-Index) assessments. Methods: Healthy individuals were submitted to two periods of evaluation: i) MIP, static maneuver to obtain IMS, determined by the Mueller’s maneuver from residual volume (RV) until total lung capacity (TLC); ii) and S-Index, inspiration against open airway starting from RV until TLC. Both measures were performed by the same evaluator and the subjects received the same instructions. Isolated maneuvers with differences < 10% were considered as reproducible measures. Results: Data from 45 subjects (21 males) were analyzed and that showed statistical difference between MIP and S-Index values (133.5 ± 33.3 and 125.6 ± 32.2 in cmH2O, respectively), with P=0.014. Linear regression showed r2=0.54 and S-Index prediction formula = 39.8+(0.75×MIP). Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong and significant association between the measures with r=0.74. The measurements showed good concordance evidenced by the Bland-Altman test. Conclusion: S-Index and MIP do not present similar values since they are evaluations of different events of the muscular contraction. However, they have a strong correlation and good agreement, which indicate that both are able to evaluate the IMS of healthy individuals. |
id |
SBCCV-1_f89625819b4d9e416715c5dc1a4a930a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-76382020000400011 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCCV-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-IndexResidual VolumeMaximal Respiratory PressuresLinear ModelsTotal Lung CapacityMuscle StrengthMuscle ContractionAbstract Objective: To verify the concurrent validity between the inspiratory muscle strength (IMS) values obtained in static (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]) and dynamic (S-Index) assessments. Methods: Healthy individuals were submitted to two periods of evaluation: i) MIP, static maneuver to obtain IMS, determined by the Mueller’s maneuver from residual volume (RV) until total lung capacity (TLC); ii) and S-Index, inspiration against open airway starting from RV until TLC. Both measures were performed by the same evaluator and the subjects received the same instructions. Isolated maneuvers with differences < 10% were considered as reproducible measures. Results: Data from 45 subjects (21 males) were analyzed and that showed statistical difference between MIP and S-Index values (133.5 ± 33.3 and 125.6 ± 32.2 in cmH2O, respectively), with P=0.014. Linear regression showed r2=0.54 and S-Index prediction formula = 39.8+(0.75×MIP). Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong and significant association between the measures with r=0.74. The measurements showed good concordance evidenced by the Bland-Altman test. Conclusion: S-Index and MIP do not present similar values since they are evaluations of different events of the muscular contraction. However, they have a strong correlation and good agreement, which indicate that both are able to evaluate the IMS of healthy individuals.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.35 n.4 2020reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0269info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAreias,Guilherme de SouzaSantiago,Luan RodriguesTeixeira,Daniel SobralReis,Michel Silvaeng2020-08-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382020000400011Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2020-08-12T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index |
title |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index |
spellingShingle |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index Areias,Guilherme de Souza Residual Volume Maximal Respiratory Pressures Linear Models Total Lung Capacity Muscle Strength Muscle Contraction |
title_short |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index |
title_full |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index |
title_fullStr |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index |
title_full_unstemmed |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index |
title_sort |
Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index |
author |
Areias,Guilherme de Souza |
author_facet |
Areias,Guilherme de Souza Santiago,Luan Rodrigues Teixeira,Daniel Sobral Reis,Michel Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santiago,Luan Rodrigues Teixeira,Daniel Sobral Reis,Michel Silva |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Areias,Guilherme de Souza Santiago,Luan Rodrigues Teixeira,Daniel Sobral Reis,Michel Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Residual Volume Maximal Respiratory Pressures Linear Models Total Lung Capacity Muscle Strength Muscle Contraction |
topic |
Residual Volume Maximal Respiratory Pressures Linear Models Total Lung Capacity Muscle Strength Muscle Contraction |
description |
Abstract Objective: To verify the concurrent validity between the inspiratory muscle strength (IMS) values obtained in static (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]) and dynamic (S-Index) assessments. Methods: Healthy individuals were submitted to two periods of evaluation: i) MIP, static maneuver to obtain IMS, determined by the Mueller’s maneuver from residual volume (RV) until total lung capacity (TLC); ii) and S-Index, inspiration against open airway starting from RV until TLC. Both measures were performed by the same evaluator and the subjects received the same instructions. Isolated maneuvers with differences < 10% were considered as reproducible measures. Results: Data from 45 subjects (21 males) were analyzed and that showed statistical difference between MIP and S-Index values (133.5 ± 33.3 and 125.6 ± 32.2 in cmH2O, respectively), with P=0.014. Linear regression showed r2=0.54 and S-Index prediction formula = 39.8+(0.75×MIP). Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong and significant association between the measures with r=0.74. The measurements showed good concordance evidenced by the Bland-Altman test. Conclusion: S-Index and MIP do not present similar values since they are evaluations of different events of the muscular contraction. However, they have a strong correlation and good agreement, which indicate that both are able to evaluate the IMS of healthy individuals. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0269 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.35 n.4 2020 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) instacron:SBCCV |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
instacron_str |
SBCCV |
institution |
SBCCV |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126601703718912 |