Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Xing,Zhenhua
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pei,Junyu, Huang,Jiabing, Hu,Xinqun, Gao,Shan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000200165
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method enabling efficient computation of FFR from three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D QCA) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame counting. We decided to perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of the literature to determine the correlation between the diagnosis of functionally significant stenosis obtained by QFR versus FFR and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of QFR for intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies concerning the diagnostic performance of QFR. Our meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The sROC was used to determine diagnostic test accuracy. Results: Nine studies consisting of 1175 vessels in 1047 patients were included in our study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR for QFR were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), 6.86 (95% CI,: 5.22-9.02), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.10-0.21), and 53.05 (95% CI: 29.75-94.58), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for QFR was 0.94. Conclusion: QFR is a simple, useful, and noninvasive modality for diagnosis of functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
id SBCCV-1_fcd3b1e18fe99e84a039cdb90b8fb5d0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382019000200165
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow ReserveMyocardial Fractional Flow ReserveCoronary Artery DiseaseQuantitative Flow RatioSensitivity and SpecificityMeta-Analysis [Publication Type]Abstract Introduction: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method enabling efficient computation of FFR from three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D QCA) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame counting. We decided to perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of the literature to determine the correlation between the diagnosis of functionally significant stenosis obtained by QFR versus FFR and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of QFR for intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies concerning the diagnostic performance of QFR. Our meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The sROC was used to determine diagnostic test accuracy. Results: Nine studies consisting of 1175 vessels in 1047 patients were included in our study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR for QFR were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), 6.86 (95% CI,: 5.22-9.02), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.10-0.21), and 53.05 (95% CI: 29.75-94.58), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for QFR was 0.94. Conclusion: QFR is a simple, useful, and noninvasive modality for diagnosis of functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000200165Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.34 n.2 2019reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0234info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessXing,ZhenhuaPei,JunyuHuang,JiabingHu,XinqunGao,Shaneng2019-03-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382019000200165Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2019-03-21T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
title Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
spellingShingle Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
Xing,Zhenhua
Myocardial Fractional Flow Reserve
Coronary Artery Disease
Quantitative Flow Ratio
Sensitivity and Specificity
Meta-Analysis [Publication Type]
title_short Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
title_full Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
title_sort Diagnostic Performance of QFR for the Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Confirmed by Fractional Flow Reserve
author Xing,Zhenhua
author_facet Xing,Zhenhua
Pei,Junyu
Huang,Jiabing
Hu,Xinqun
Gao,Shan
author_role author
author2 Pei,Junyu
Huang,Jiabing
Hu,Xinqun
Gao,Shan
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Xing,Zhenhua
Pei,Junyu
Huang,Jiabing
Hu,Xinqun
Gao,Shan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Myocardial Fractional Flow Reserve
Coronary Artery Disease
Quantitative Flow Ratio
Sensitivity and Specificity
Meta-Analysis [Publication Type]
topic Myocardial Fractional Flow Reserve
Coronary Artery Disease
Quantitative Flow Ratio
Sensitivity and Specificity
Meta-Analysis [Publication Type]
description Abstract Introduction: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method enabling efficient computation of FFR from three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D QCA) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame counting. We decided to perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of the literature to determine the correlation between the diagnosis of functionally significant stenosis obtained by QFR versus FFR and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of QFR for intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies concerning the diagnostic performance of QFR. Our meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The sROC was used to determine diagnostic test accuracy. Results: Nine studies consisting of 1175 vessels in 1047 patients were included in our study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR for QFR were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), 6.86 (95% CI,: 5.22-9.02), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.10-0.21), and 53.05 (95% CI: 29.75-94.58), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for QFR was 0.94. Conclusion: QFR is a simple, useful, and noninvasive modality for diagnosis of functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000200165
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000200165
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0234
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.34 n.2 2019
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126600366784512